Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1821 - 1840 of 1845
Working Group on the issue of human rights and transnational corporations and other business enterprises
Report to HRC A/HRC/44/43/Add.1 from 3 April 2019 to 12 April 2019 14 April 2020 Working Group on the issue of human rights and transnational corporations and other business enterprises Georgia United Nations A/HRC/44/43/Add.1 General Assembly Distr.: UNSPA/HRC/44/43/Add.1https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f44%2f43%2fAdd.1&Lang=en
Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self-determination
Report to HRC A/HRC/7/7/Add.2 from 29 January 2007 to 2 February 2007 4 February 2008 Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self determination Peru UNITED NATIONS UNSPA/HRC/7/7/Add.2https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f7%2f7%2fAdd.2&Lang=en
Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self-determination
Report to HRC A/HRC/7/7/Add.4 from 9 July 2007 to 13 July 2007 4 February 2008 Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self determination Chile UNITED NATIONS A UNSPA/HRC/7/7/Add.4https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f7%2f7%2fAdd.4&Lang=en
Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self-determination
Report to HRC A/HRC/7/7/Add.3 from 14 May 2007 to 18 May 2007 8 January 2008 Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self determination Fiji UNITED NATIONS A General UNSPA/HRC/7/7/Add.3https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f7%2f7%2fAdd.3&Lang=en
Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self-determination
Report to HRC A/HRC/24/45/Add.1 from 18 February 2013 to 22 February 2013 5 August 2013 Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self determination Honduras United UNSPA/HRC/24/45/Add.1https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f24%2f45%2fAdd.1&Lang=en
Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self-determination
Report to HRC A/HRC/42/42/Add.2 from 21 June 2018 to 29 June 2018 26 July 2019 Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self determination Austria United Nations UNSPA/HRC/42/42/Add.2https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f42%2f42%2fAdd.2&Lang=en
X and Y v. Switzerland
X and Y v. Switzerland CAT/C/71/D/807/2017 Communication number s : 807/2017 Author: X and Y Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 71 Country Switzerland Submission date 27 Sep 2016 Date of decision 19 Jul 2021 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/71/D/807/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3372/en-US
X. v. Argentina
X. v. Argentina CRPD/C/11/D/8/2012 Communication number s : 008/2012 Author: X. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 16 Country Argentina Submission date 22 Jun 2012 Date of decision 11 Apr 2014 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCRPD/C/11/D/8/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1989/en-US
X. v. Austria
X. v. Austria CEDAW/C/64/D/67/2014 Communication number s : 067/2014 Author: X. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 64 Country Austria Submission date 15 Nov 2013 Date of decision 11 Jul 2016 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/64/D/67/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2108/en-US
X. v. Switzerland
X. v. Switzerland CAT/C/53/D/470/2011 Communication number s : 470/2011 Author: X. represented by counsel Monique Bremi Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 53 Country Switzerland Submission date 15 Jul 2011 Date of decision 24 Nov 2014 JUTBCAT/C/53/D/470/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2040/en-US
X. v. Timor-Leste
X. v. Timor Leste CEDAW/C/69/D/88/2015 Communication number s : 088/2015 Author: X. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 69 Country Timor Leste Submission date 16 Feb 2015 Date of decision 26 Feb 2018 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/69/D/88/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2638/en-US
X. v. Timor-Leste
X. v. Timor Leste CEDAW/C/69/D/88/2015 Communication number s : 088/2015 Author: X. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 69 Country Timor Leste Submission date Date of decision 26 Feb 2018 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCEDAW/C/69/D/88/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2428/en-US
Y. M. v. Russian Federation
Y. M. v. Russian Federation CCPR/C/104/D/1858/2009 Communication number s : 1858/2009 Author: Y. M. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 104 Country Russian Federation Submission date 20 Oct 2007 Date of decision 26 Mar 2012 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/104/D/1858/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1453/en-US
Y.R. v. Australia
Y.R. v. Australia CAT/C/61/D/713/2015 Communication number s : 713/2015 Author: Y.R. represented by counsel Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 61 Country Australia Submission date 27 Oct 2015 Date of decision 03 Aug 2017 Comment: Decision of JUTBCAT/C/61/D/713/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2277/en-US
Y.R. v. Russian Federation
Y.R. v. Russian Federation CAT/C/72/D/869/2018 Communication number s : 869/2018 Author: Y.R. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 72 Country Russian Federation Submission date 05 Dec 2017 Date of decision 12 Nov 2021 Comment: This JUTBCAT/C/72/D/869/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3351/en-US
Y v. Canada
Y v. Canada CAT/C/55/D/512/2012 Communication number s : 512/2012 Author: Y Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 55 Country Canada Submission date 06 Jan 2012 Date of decision 28 Jul 2015 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCAT/C/55/D/512/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1980/en-US
Yakupova v. Uzbekistan
Yakupova v. Uzbekistan CCPR/C/92/D/1205/2003 Communication number s : 1205/2003 Author: Zinaida Yakupova Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 92 Country Uzbekistan Submission date 08 Oct 2003 Date of decision 04 Apr 2008 Comment: Under rule 92 JUTBCCPR/C/92/D/1205/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1411/en-US
Z.A.H. v. Canada
Z.A.H. v. Canada CAT/C/61/D/687/2015 Communication number s : 687/2015 Author: Z.A.H. represented by counsel Rajwinder S. Bhambi Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 61 Country Canada Submission date 22 Jun 2015 Date of decision 11 Aug JUTBCAT/C/61/D/687/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2284/en-US
Z.K. and A.K. v. Switzerland
Z.K. and A.K. v. Switzerland CAT/C/63/D/698/2015 Communication number s : 698/2015 Author: Z.K. and A.K. represented by counsel Stephanie Motz Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 63 Country Switzerland Submission date 20 Aug 2015 Date of JUTBCAT/C/63/D/698/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2722/en-US
Z. v. Australia
Z. v. Australia CAT/C/53/D/511/2012 Communication number s : 511/2012 Author: Z. represented by Norman Gibson Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 53 Country Australia Submission date 29 Sep 2011 Date of decision 26 Nov 2014 Comment: JUTBCAT/C/53/D/511/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2057/en-US