Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 60
CASE OF A.P., M.P. AND T.P. v. SWITZERLAND
CASE OF A.P. M.P. AND T.P. v. SWITZERLAND 19958/92 N/A CHE 8/29/1997 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 6 2 Not necessary to examine Art. 6 1 Not necessary to examine Art. 6 3 Costs and expenses award Convention proceedings Ordinance on Direct Federal Tax ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0829JUD001995892https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58178
CASE OF ALEKSANDR ZAICHENKO v. RUSSIA
CASE OF ALEKSANDR ZAICHENKO v. RUSSIA 39660/02 ADAMCHIK A. RUS 2/18/2010 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 6 3 c Violation of Art. 6 1 Pecuniary damage claim rejected Non pecuniary damage award Articles 48 2 and 51 of the Constitution Articles 47 48 77 141 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0218JUD003966002https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-97346
CASE OF ASCH v. AUSTRIA
CASE OF ASCH v. AUSTRIA 12398/86 N/A AUT 4/26/1991 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 6 1 6 3 d Criminal Code Articles 105 83 72 Code of Criminal Procedure Articles 152 para. 1 and 252 paras. 2 and 3 445 70 122 440 136 ECLI:CE:ECHR:1991:0426JUD001239886 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1991:0426JUD001239886https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57676
CASE OF AVERILL v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF AVERILL v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 36408/97 N/A GBR 6/6/2000 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 6 1 No violation of Art. 6 2 Violation of Art. 6 1 6 3 c Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Costs and expenses partial award Convention ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0606JUD003640897https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58836
CASE OF AYETULLAH AY v. TURKEY
CASE OF AYETULLAH AY v. TURKEY 29084/07 1191/08 CO KUN S. TUR 10/27/2020 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 6 6 3 Right to a fair trial Article 6 Criminal proceedings Article 6 1 Fair hearing Adversarial trial Article 6 Right to a fair trial Article 6 3 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1027JUD002908407https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-205373
CASE OF BALITSKIY v. UKRAINE
CASE OF BALITSKIY v. UKRAINE 12793/03 BUSHCHENKO A. P. UKR 11/3/2011 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Violation of Art. 6 1 and 6 3 c Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient 26 126 243 225 445 76 136 440 216 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1103JUD001279303https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-107185
CASE OF BARAN AND HUN v. TURKEY
CASE OF BARAN AND HUN v. TURKEY 30685/05 TUNCER G. TUR 5/20/2010 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Violation of Art. 3 substantive aspect Violation of Art. 3 procedural aspect Violation of Art. 6 1 and 6 3 c Pecuniary damage claim dismissed Non pecuniary ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0520JUD003068505https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-98664
CASE OF BEUZE v. BELGIUM
CASE OF BEUZE v. BELGIUM 71409/10 PACI D. BEL 11/9/2018 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 6 Right to a fair trial Article 6 Criminal proceedings Article 6 1 Fair hearing Article 6 3 Rights of defence Article 6 3 c Defence through legal assistance Non ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1109JUD007140910https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-187802
CASE OF BOKHONKO v. GEORGIA
CASE OF BOKHONKO v. GEORGIA 6739/11 LONDARIDZE N. GEO 10/22/2020 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Six month period Violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Effective investigation Procedural aspect ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1022JUD000673911https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-205226
CASE OF BORGERS v. BELGIUM
CASE OF BORGERS v. BELGIUM 12005/86 N/A BEL 10/30/1991 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 6 1 Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Costs and expenses award Convention proceedings Judicial Code Articles 141 409 413 418 1107 1109 445 136 119 440 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1991:1030JUD001200586https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57720
CASE OF BRICMONT v. BELGIUM
CASE OF BRICMONT v. BELGIUM 10857/84 N/A BEL 7/7/1989 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection rejected non exhaustion Violation of Art. 6 Pecuniary damage claim dismissed Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Costs and expenses award domestic ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1989:0707JUD001085784https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57611
CASE OF ÖCALAN v. TURKEY
CASE OF CALAN v. TURKEY 46221/99 KENTRIDGE Sir Sydney MULLER Mark OTTY Timothy TUGLUK Aysel TUR 5/12/2005 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Article 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Violation of Article 5 Right to liberty and security Article ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0512JUD004622199https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-69022
CASE OF ÖCALAN v. TURKEY
CASE OF CALAN v. TURKEY 46221/99 N/A TUR 3/12/2003 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Article 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Violation of Article 5 Right to liberty and security Article 5 4 Review of lawfulness of detention Violation of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0312JUD004622199https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-60979
CASE OF CAMPBELL AND FELL v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF CAMPBELL AND FELL v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 7819/77 7878/77 N/A GBR 6/28/1984 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection partially allowed non exhaustion of domestic remedies Violation of Art. 6 1 Violation of Art. 6 3 b Violation of Art. 6 3 c Violation of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1984:0628JUD000781977https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57456
CASE OF COEME AND OTHERS v. BELGIUM
CASE OF COEME AND OTHERS v. BELGIUM 32492/96 32547/96 32548/96 33209/96 33210/96 N/A BEL 6/22/2000 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 6 1 in respect of Mr Coeme fair hearing Not necessary to examine Art. 6 2 and 6 3 Violation of Art. 6 1 tribunal established ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0622JUD003249296https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-59194
CASE OF CRÉMIEUX v. FRANCE
CASE OF CR MIEUX v. FRANCE 11471/85 IMBACH C. FRA 2/25/1993 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection rejected non exhaustion Violation of Art. 8 Not necessary to examine Art. 6 3 Not necessary to examine Art. 10 Non pecuniary damage finding of violation ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1993:0225JUD001147185https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57805
CASE OF DAUD v. PORTUGAL
CASE OF DAUD v. PORTUGAL 22600/93 PRT 4/21/1998 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 6 1 6 3 c Not necessary to examine Art. 6 3 e Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient 445 76 136 440 86 162 216 ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0421JUD002260093 CASE OF DAUD v. ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0421JUD002260093https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58154
CASE OF DOMENICHINI v. ITALY
CASE OF DOMENICHINI v. ITALY 15943/90 N/A ITA 11/15/1996 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits non exhaustion of domestic remedies Preliminary objection rejected non exhaustion of domestic remedies Violation of Art. 6 3 b Violation of Art. 8 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:1115JUD001594390https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58073
CASE OF DOORSON v. THE NETHERLANDS
CASE OF DOORSON v. THE NETHERLANDS 20524/92 N/A NLD 3/26/1996 12:00:00 AM Lack of jurisdiction new complaint No violation of Art. 6 1 6 3 d Code of Criminal Procedure CCP Articles 260 263 280 282 para. 1 315 316 414 415 Act of 11 November 1993 adding ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0326JUD002052492https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57972
CASE OF DROZD AND JANOUSEK v. FRANCE AND SPAIN
CASE OF DROZD AND JANOUSEK v. FRANCE AND SPAIN 12747/87 N/A ESP FRA 6/26/1992 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection allowed incompetence Preliminary objection rejected non exhaustion No violation of Art. 5 1 Franco andorran custom on the transfer to French ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1992:0626JUD001274787https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57774