Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 107
A/HRC/27/56/Add.2
A/HRC/27/56/Add.2 A/HRC/27/56/Add.2 NULL 2014 08 28T00:00:00 SR Truth justice reparation Addendum Mission to Uruguay Summary The Special Rapporteur on the promotion of truth justice reparation and guarantees of non recurrence Pablo de Greiff paid an UHRIA/HRC/27/56/Add.2https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/8159e491-d477-481e-be72-8ac2a8107329
A/HRC/47/9: Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review - Saint Lucia
United Nations A/HRC/47/9 General Assembly Distr.: General 14 April 2021 Original: English Human Rights Council Forty seventh session 21 June 9 July 2021 Agenda item 6 Universal periodic review Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review UPRA/HRC/47/9https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/country-reports/ahrc479-report-working-group-universal-periodic-review-saint-lucia
Abdurasulov et al. v. Kyrgyzstan
Abdurasulov et al. v. Kyrgyzstan CCPR/C/135/D/3200/2018 3207/2018 Communication number s : 3201/2018 3202/2018 3203/2018 3204/2018 3205/2018 3206/2018 3207/2018 3200/2018 Author: Mukhamadrasul Abdurasulov Osmonali Otamirzaev Bakhodir Zhalalov Abdurashit JUTBCCPR/C/135/D/3200/2018-3207/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3645/en-US
Akmatov v. Kyrgyzstan
Akmatov v. Kyrgyzstan CCPR/C/115/D/2052/2011 Communication number s : 2052/2011 Author: Suyunbai Akmatov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 115 Country Kyrgyzstan Submission date 07 Apr 2011 Date of decision 29 Oct 2015 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/115/D/2052/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2031/en-US
Alimov v. Kyrgyzstan
Alimov v. Kyrgyzstan CCPR/C/134/D/2836/2016 Communication number s : 2836/2016 Author: Shkurillo Alimov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 134 Country Kyrgyzstan Submission date 26 Nov 2015 Date of decision 11 Mar 2022 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/134/D/2836/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3500/en-US
Amirov v. Russian Federation
Amirov v. Russian Federation CCPR/C/95/D/1447/2006 Communication number s : 1447/2006 Author: Abubakar Amirov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 95 Country Russian Federation Submission date 09 Jan 2006 Date of decision 02 Apr 2009 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/95/D/1447/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1503/en-US
Avadanov v. Azerbaijan
Avadanov v. Azerbaijan CCPR/C/100/D/1633/2007 Communication number s : 1633/2007 Author: Khilal Avadanov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 100 Country Azerbaijan Submission date 31 Jul 2007 Date of decision 25 Oct 2010 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/100/D/1633/2007https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1591/en-US
Bagale v. Nepal
Bagale v. Nepal CCPR/C/130/D/2777/2016 Communication number s : 2777/2016 Author: Hom Bahadur Bagale Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 130 Country Nepal Submission date 17 Dec 2015 Date of decision 02 Nov 2020 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/130/D/2777/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3277/en-US
Boboev et.al. v. Tajikistan
Boboev et.al. v. Tajikistan CCPR/C/120/D/2173/2012 Communication number s : 2173/2012 Author: Dzhuraboy Boboev Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 120 Country Tajikistan Submission date 09 Jul 2012 Date of decision 19 Jul 2017 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/120/D/2173/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2311/en-US
Butovenko v. Ukraine
Butovenko v. Ukraine CCPR/C/102/D/1412/2005 Communication number s : 1412/2005 Author: Aleksandr Butovenko Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 102 Country Ukraine Submission date 28 Mar 2005 Date of decision 19 Jul 2011 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/102/D/1412/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1207/en-US
C. v. Australia
C. v. Australia CCPR/C/76/D/900/1999 Communication number s : 900/1999 Author: C. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 76 Country Australia Submission date 23 Nov 1999 Date of decision 28 Oct 2002 Comment: Under rule 85 of the Committee s rules JUTBCCPR/C/76/D/900/1999https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1026/en-US
CASE OF AKKUM AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
CASE OF AKKUM AND OTHERS v. TURKEY 21894/93 BOYLE Kevin HAMPSON Fran oise TUR 3/24/2005 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Violation of Article 38 Examination of the case ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0324JUD002189493https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-68601
CASE OF AL-SKEINI AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF AL SKEINI AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 55721/07 PUBLIC INTEREST LAWYERS GBR 7/7/2011 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objections dismissed estoppel non exhaustion of domestic remedies Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed lack of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0707JUD005572107https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-105606
CASE OF CORREIA DE MATOS v. PORTUGAL
CASE OF CORREIA DE MATOS v. PORTUGAL 56402/12 PRT 4/4/2018 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 6 6 3 c Right to a fair trial Article 6 Criminal proceedings Article 6 1 Fair hearing Equality of arms Article 6 3 c Defence in person Article 6 Right to a fair ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0404JUD005640212https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-182243
CASE OF ERGİ v. TURKEY
CASE OF ERG v. TURKEY 23818/94 N/A TUR 7/28/1998 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection rejected validity of application Preliminary objections rejected non exhaustion of domestic remedies estoppel No violation of Art. 2 applicant s sister Violation of Art. 2 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0728JUD002381894https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58200
CASE OF GÄFGEN v. GERMANY
CASE OF G FGEN v. GERMANY 22978/05 HEUCHEMER M. DEU 6/1/2010 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed non exhaustion of domestic remedies Violation of Art. 3 substantive aspect No violation of Art. 6 1 and 6 3 Articles 1 1 and 104 1 of the Basic Law ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0601JUD002297805https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-99015
CASE OF GEORGIA v. RUSSIA (II)
CASE OF GEORGIA v. RUSSIA II 38263/08 RUS 1/21/2021 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objections dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Ratione loci ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0121JUD003826308https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-207757
CASE OF ISSA AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
CASE OF ISSA AND OTHERS v. TURKEY 31821/96 YILDIZ Kerim TUR 11/16/2004 12:00:00 AM Not necessary to examine Art. 2 Not necessary to examine Art. 3 Not necessary to examine Art. 5 Not necessary to examine Art. 8 Not necessary to examine Art. 13 Not ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:1116JUD003182196https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-67460
CASE OF JALOUD v. THE NETHERLANDS
CASE OF JALOUD v. THE NETHERLANDS 47708/08 ZEGVELD L. EIKELBOOM A.W. NLD 11/20/2014 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 2 Right to life Article 2 Positive obligations Article 2 1 Effective investigation Procedural aspect Non pecuniary damage award Article 38 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1120JUD004770808https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-148367
CASE OF KHAMTOKHU AND AKSENCHIK v. RUSSIA
CASE OF KHAMTOKHU AND AKSENCHIK v. RUSSIA 60367/08 961/11 YERMOLAYEVA N. MARALYAN A. DAVIDYAN E. MOSKALENKO K. RUS 1/24/2017 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 14 5 Prohibition of discrimination Article 14 Discrimination Article 5 Right to liberty and ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0124JUD006036708https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-170663