Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 3541 - 3560 of 3564
Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self-determination
Report to HRC A/HRC/7/7/Add.3 from 14 May 2007 to 18 May 2007 8 January 2008 Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self determination Fiji UNITED NATIONS A General UNSPA/HRC/7/7/Add.3https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f7%2f7%2fAdd.3&Lang=en
Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self-determination
Report to HRC A/HRC/27/50/Add.1 from 7 May 2014 to 16 May 2014 4 August 2014 Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self determination Comoros United Nations UNSPA/HRC/27/50/Add.1https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f27%2f50%2fAdd.1&Lang=en
Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self-determination
Report to HRC A/HRC/15/25/Add.3 from 20 July 2009 to 24 July 2009 15 June 2010 Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self determination United States of America UNSPA/HRC/15/25/Add.3https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f15%2f25%2fAdd.3&Lang=en
Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self-determination
Report to HRC A/HRC/45/9/Add.1 from 13 May 2019 to 17 May 2019 7 July 2020 Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self determination Switzerland United Nations UNSPA/HRC/45/9/Add.1https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f45%2f9%2fAdd.1&Lang=en
Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self-determination
Report to HRC A/HRC/24/45/Add.2 from 8 December 2012 to 14 December 2012 1 July 2013 Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self determination Somalia United UNSPA/HRC/24/45/Add.2https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f24%2f45%2fAdd.2&Lang=en
Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self-determination
Report to HRC A/HRC/30/34/Add.1 from 7 October 2014 to 10 October 2014 17 August 2015 Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self determination C te d Ivoire United UNSPA/HRC/30/34/Add.1https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f30%2f34%2fAdd.1&Lang=en
Wuyts v. Netherlands
Wuyts v. Netherlands CCPR/C/69/D/785/1997 Communication number s : 785/1997 Author: Alexandre Wuyts Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 69 Country Netherlands Submission date 24 Jun 1996 Date of decision 17 Jul 2000 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/69/D/785/1997https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/884/en-US
X.Q.L. v. Australia
X.Q.L. v. Australia CAT/C/52/D/455/2011 Communication number s : 455/2011 Author: X.Q.L. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 52 Country Australia Submission date 03 Mar 2011 Date of decision 02 May 2014 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/52/D/455/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1828/en-US
X. v. Timor-Leste
X. v. Timor Leste CEDAW/C/69/D/88/2015 Communication number s : 088/2015 Author: X. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 69 Country Timor Leste Submission date 16 Feb 2015 Date of decision 26 Feb 2018 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/69/D/88/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2638/en-US
X. v. Timor-Leste
X. v. Timor Leste CEDAW/C/69/D/88/2015 Communication number s : 088/2015 Author: X. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 69 Country Timor Leste Submission date Date of decision 26 Feb 2018 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCEDAW/C/69/D/88/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2428/en-US
XERO FLOR W POLSCE SP. Z O.O. v. Poland
XERO FLOR W POLSCE SP. Z O.O. v. Poland POL 07/08/2021 00:00:00 04/10/2021 09:59:18 Case Description: The case concerns the breach of the applicant company s right to a tribunal established by law due to the participation of judge M.M. in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58569
Y.G. v. Switzerland
Y.G. v. Switzerland CAT/C/65/D/822/2017 Communication number s : 822/2017 Author: Y.G. represented by counsel Urs Ebn ther Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 65 Country Switzerland Submission date 22 Apr 2017 Date of decision 26 Nov 2018 JUTBCAT/C/65/D/822/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2595/en-US
YAKOVENKO v. Ukraine
YAKOVENKO v. Ukraine UKR 25/01/2008 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: These cases mainly concern inhuman and/or degrading treatment due to overcrowding poor material conditions and inadequate nutrition in police establishments pre trial EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31204
Young v. Australia
Young v. Australia CCPR/C/78/D/941/2000 Communication number s : 941/2000 Author: Edward Young Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 78 Country Australia Submission date 29 Jun 1999 Date of decision 06 Aug 2003 Comment: Committee members Ruth JUTBCCPR/C/78/D/941/2000https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1076/en-US
Z.T. v. Norway
Z.T. v. Norway CAT/C/23/D/127/1999 Communication number s : 127/1999 Author: Z.T. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 23 Country Norway Submission date 25 Jan 1998 Date of decision 19 Nov 1999 Comment: Under rule 108 paragraph 9 of the JUTBCAT/C/23/D/127/1999https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/220/en-US
Z.U.B.S. v. Australia
Z.U.B.S. v. Australia CERD/C/55/D/6/1995 Communication number s : 6/1995 Author: Z.U.B.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 55 Country Australia Submission date 17 Jan 1995 Date of decision 26 Dec 1999 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCERD/C/55/D/6/1995https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3024/en-US
Z. v. Australia
Z. v. Australia CCPR/C/111/D/2049/2011 Communication number s : 2049/2011 Author: Z. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 111 Country Australia Submission date 15 Apr 2011 Date of decision 18 Jul 2014 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/111/D/2049/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1866/en-US
ZHBANOV v. Bulgaria
ZHBANOV v. Bulgaria BGR 22/10/2004 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of criminal proceedings due to lengthy periods of inactivity at the pre trial stage repeated remittals of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3595
Zavadskaya et al. v. Belarus
Zavadskaya et al. v. Belarus CCPR/C/132/D/2865/2016 Communication number s : 2865/2016 Author: Svetlana Zavadskaya et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 132 Country Belarus Submission date 21 Jan 2014 Date of decision 23 Jul 2021 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/132/D/2865/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3174/en-US
Zentralrat Deutscher Sinti und Roma et al. v. Germany
Zentralrat Deutscher Sinti und Roma et al. v. Germany CERD/C/72/D/38/2006 Communication number s : 038/2006 Author: Zentralrat Deutscher Sinti und Roma et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 72 Country Germany Submission date 29 Aug 2006 JUTBCERD/C/72/D/38/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1732/en-US