Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 21 - 40 of 5164
A/HRC/47/4: Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review - Federated States of Micronesia
United Nations A/HRC/47/4 General Assembly Distr.: General 26 March 2021 Original: English Human Rights Council Forty seventh session 21 June 9 July 2021 Agenda item 6 Universal periodic review Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review UPRA/HRC/47/4https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/country-reports/ahrc474-report-working-group-universal-periodic-review-federated-states
A/HRC/47/5: Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review - Lebanon
United Nations A/HRC/47/5 General Assembly Distr.: General 7 April 2021 Original: English Human Rights Council Forty seventh session 21 June 9 July 2021 Agenda item 6 Universal periodic review Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review UPRA/HRC/47/5https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/country-reports/ahrc475-report-working-group-universal-periodic-review-lebanon
A.K. et al. v. Albania
A.K. et al. v. Albania CCPR/C/127/D/2438/2014 Communication number s : 2438/2014 Author: A.K. et al. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 127 Country Albania Submission date 04 Jul 2014 Date of decision 08 Nov 2019 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/127/D/2438/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2890/en-US
A.M. v. Italy
A.M. v. Italy ITA 14/03/2000 00:00:00 28/11/2016 10:46:44 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings resulting in the applicant s conviction on the basis of testimony obtained in the US before trial EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-43007
A.N.A. v. Denmark
A.N.A. v. Denmark CEDAW/C/73/D/94/2015 Communication number s : 094/2015 Author: A.N.A. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 73 Country Denmark Submission date 14 Sep 2015 Date of decision 15 Jul 2019 Comment: This document has no JUTBCEDAW/C/73/D/94/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2656/en-US
A.P.J. v. Denmark
A.P.J. v. Denmark CCPR/C/119/D/2253/2013 Communication number s : 2253/2013 Author: A.P.J. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 119 Country Denmark Submission date 10 Jun 2013 Date of decision 16 Mar 2017 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/119/D/2253/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2266/en-US
A.P., M.P. AND T.P. v. Switzerland
A.P. M.P. AND T.P. v. Switzerland CHE 29/08/1997 00:00:00 27/10/2016 18:58:12 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Infringement of the presumption of innocence as the applicants had as heirs been convicted of a tax offence EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4634
A.S.M. and R.A.H. v. Denmark,Italy
A.S.M. and R.A.H. v. Denmark Italy CCPR/C/117/D/2378/2014 Communication number s : 2378/2014 Author: A.S.M. and R.A.H. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 117 Country Denmark Italy Submission date 14 Apr 2014 Date of decision 07 Jul 2016 JUTBCCPR/C/117/D/2378/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2245/en-US
A.S. v. France
A.S. v. France FRA 30/12/1997 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:01:23 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Excessive length of civil proceedings before the Social Chamber of the Cour de cassation. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31922
A decency threshold for prisons – criteria for assessing conditions of detention
A decency threshold for prisons criteria for assessing conditions of detention fcn fk fkm fkmh fkmv fkrg fmpm ftb 2021 05 06 2018 04 19 European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment CPT CPT/Inf 2021 5 CPTCPT/Inf(2021)5-parthttps://hudoc.cpt.coe.int/eng?i=p-standards-inf-2021-5-part-en
ABENAVOLI v. Italy
ABENAVOLI v. Italy ITA 02/09/1997 00:00:00 08/11/2016 09:13:26 Case Description: The Abenavoli group of cases concern the excessive length of proceedings before the administrative courts since the 1990s violations of Article 6 1 . Status of Execution: The EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28186
ABRAMCZYK v. Poland
ABRAMCZYK v. Poland POL 12/09/2007 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:10:55 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and protection of rights in detention: Excessive length of civil and criminal proceedings and lack of an effective remedy in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20363
ABRAMOV v. Ukraine
ABRAMOV v. Ukraine UKR 10/10/2008 00:00:00 07/11/2016 12:29:57 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Non enforcement or delayed enforcement of domestic judicial decisions mostly delivered against entities owned or controlled by EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-25317
ABUYEVA AND OTHERS v. Russia
ABUYEVA AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 11/04/2011 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: These cases concern mainly violations resulting from or relating to the actions of Russian security forces during anti terrorist operations in the Northern Caucasus EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14124
ACADEMY TRADING LTD v. Greece
ACADEMY TRADING LTD v. Greece GRC 04/04/2000 00:00:00 07/11/2016 09:36:22 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Excessive length of civil proceedings. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-22158
ADIYAMAN v. Turkey
ADIYAMAN v. Turkey TUR 30/01/2002 00:00:00 28/10/2016 15:13:12 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Excessive length of criminal proceedings. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: Individual EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5496
ADOPTED CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS: CZECH REPUBLIC
ADOPTED CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS: CZECH REPUBLIC CEDAW/C/CZE/CO/6 NULL 2016 03 10T00:00:00 CEDAW United Nations CEDAW/C/CZE/CO/6 Convention on the Elimination Distr.: General of All Forms of Discrimination 14 March 2016 against Women Original: English UHRICEDAW/C/CZE/CO/6https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/df44459f-375a-4034-b0d5-fafc9b172d4d
AERTS v. Belgium
AERTS v. Belgium BEL 30/07/1998 00:00:00 25/10/2016 14:46:28 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention / access to and effective functioning of justice: Lawfulness of the applicant s detention in a psychiatric wing of a prison pending his EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1369
AFANASYEV v. Ukraine
AFANASYEV v. Ukraine UKR 05/07/2005 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: These cases concern physical or psychological torture and/or ill treatment by the police mostly in order to obtain confessions substantive violations of Article 3 lack of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31348
AGAOGLU v. Turkey
AGAOGLU v. Turkey TUR 06/03/2006 00:00:00 09/11/2016 15:26:10 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings on the ground of lacking independence and impartiality of the state security court on account of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-34949