Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 121 - 140 of 5164
Albania: despite positive developments concerns around intolerant public speech and poor integration of Roma remain, says the Council of Europe’s anti-racism commission
Albania: despite positive developments concerns around intolerant public speech and poor integration of Roma remain says the Council of Europe s anti racism commission ALB 2015 06 09 Press Release 09.06.2015 Albanian version Albania: despite positive ECRIALB-PR-V-2015-189-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=ALB-PR-V-2015-189-ENG
Ali Aarrass v. Morocco
Ali Aarrass v. Morocco CAT/C/68/D/817/2017 Communication number s : 817/2017 Author: Ali Aarrass represented by counsel Dounia Alamat and Christophe Marchand Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 68 Country Morocco Submission date 17 Mar 2017 JUTBCAT/C/68/D/817/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2695/en-US
Almas Kusherbaev v. Kazakhstan
Almas Kusherbaev v. Kazakhstan CCPR/C/107/D/2027/2011 Communication number s : 2027/2011 Author: Almas Kusherbaev Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 107 Country Kazakhstan Submission date 06 Sep 2010 Date of decision 25 Mar 2013 JUTBCCPR/C/107/D/2027/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1278/en-US
Alzery v. Sweden
Alzery v. Sweden CCPR/C/88/D/1416/2005 Communication number s : 1416/2005 Author: Mohammed Alzery Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 88 Country Sweden Submission date 29 Jul 2005 Date of decision 25 Oct 2006 Comment: Pursuant to rule 90 of JUTBCCPR/C/88/D/1416/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1300/en-US
Amanda Jane Mellet v. Ireland
Amanda Jane Mellet v. Ireland CCPR/C/116/D/2324/2013 Communication number s : 2324/2013 Author: Amanda Jane Mellet Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 116 Country Ireland Submission date 11 Nov 2013 Date of decision 31 Mar 2016 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/116/D/2324/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2152/en-US
Amundson v. Czech Republic
Amundson v. Czech Republic CCPR/C/95/D/1508/2006 Communication number s : 1508/2006 Author: Olga Amundson Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 95 Country Czech Republic Submission date 13 Mar 2006 Date of decision 17 Mar 2009 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/95/D/1508/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1497/en-US
Angela González Carreño v. Spain
Angela Gonz lez Carre o v. Spain CEDAW/C/58/D/47/2012 Communication number s : 047/2012 Author: Angela Gonz lez Carre o Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 58 Country Spain Submission date 19 Sep 2012 Date of decision 16 Jul 2014 Comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/58/D/47/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1878/en-US
Anna Belousova v. Kazakhstan
Anna Belousova v. Kazakhstan CEDAW/C/61/D/45/2012 Communication number s : 045/2012 Author: Anna Belousova Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 61 Country Kazakhstan Submission date 12 Sep 2012 Date of decision 13 Jul 2015 Comment: This JUTBCEDAW/C/61/D/45/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2053/en-US
Anne Nuorgam et al. v. Finland
Anne Nuorgam et al. v. Finland CERD/C/106/D/59/2016 Communication number s : 59/2016 Author: Anne Nuorgam et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 106 Country Finland Submission date 14 Mar 2016 Date of decision 22 Apr 2022 Comment: This JUTBCERD/C/106/D/59/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3745/en-US
Anti-Doping Convention (ETS No. 135)
Anti Doping Convention ETS No. 135 135 Strasbourg 1989 11 16T00:00:00 Treaty open for signature by the member States the other States Parties to the European Cultural Convention the non member States which have participated in its elaboration and for COEETS No. 135https://rm.coe.int/168007b0e0
Arenz et al. v. Germany
Arenz et al. v. Germany CCPR/C/80/D/1138/2002 Communication number s : 1138/2002 Author: Paul Arenz Thomas R der and Dagmar R der Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 80 Country Germany Submission date 26 Sep 2002 Date of decision 24 Mar JUTBCCPR/C/80/D/1138/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1062/en-US
Asmae Taghzouti et al v. Spain
Asmae Taghzouti et al v. Spain E/C.12/69/D/56/2018 Communication number s : 056/2018 Author: Asmae Taghzouti Ezqouihel Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 69 Country Spain Submission date 21 Sep 2018 Date of decision 22 Feb 2021 Comment: JUTBE/C.12/69/D/56/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2922/en-US
B.L. v. Sweden
B.L. v. Sweden SWE 20/06/2000 00:00:00 26/10/2016 19:44:38 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Infringement of the presumption of innocence due to statements made by authorities concerning a father s guilt of sexual abuse of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2090
B.N. and S.R. v. Burundi
B.N. and S.R. v. Burundi CAT/C/71/D/858/2018 Communication number s : 858/2018 Author: B.N. and S.R. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 71 Country Burundi Submission date 22 Dec 2017 Date of decision 19 Jul 2021 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/71/D/858/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3375/en-US
B.Z. et al. v. Albania
B.Z. et al. v. Albania CCPR/C/121/D/2837/2016 Communication number s : 2837/2016 Author: B.Z. et al. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 121 Country Albania Submission date 13 Jan 2016 Date of decision 08 Nov 2017 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/121/D/2837/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2362/en-US
BACELAR DE SOUSA MACHAD v. Portugal
BACELAR DE SOUSA MACHAD v. Portugal PRT 22/06/2000 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:02:55 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Excessive length of civil proceedings. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-9397
BACELAR DE SOUSA MACHAD v. Portugal
BACELAR DE SOUSA MACHAD v. Portugal PRT 22/06/2000 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:02:55 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Excessive length of civil proceedings. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-9427
BACIC v. Croatia
BACIC v. Croatia HRV 16/12/2004 00:00:00 03/11/2016 16:22:41 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Lack of access to a court due to legislation staying all civil proceedings concerning claims for damages in respect of terrorist EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12211
BACQUET v. France
BACQUET v. France FRA 01/05/2000 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:02:39 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Excessive length of civil proceedings before administrative courts. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-32066
BADAN v. the Republic of Moldova
BADAN v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 29/06/2021 00:00:00 02/07/2021 16:22:27 Case Description: Functioning of justice and protection of property rights / remedy: Failure to enforce final domestic judgments rendered in favour of the applicants and lack of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58007