Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 21 - 40 of 5339
A.M.B. v. Ecuador
A.M.B. v. Ecuador E/C.12/58/D/3/2014 Communication number s : 003/2014 Author: A.M.B. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 58 Country Ecuador Submission date Date of decision 20 Jun 2016 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBE/C.12/58/D/3/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2137/en-US
A.M.H. El Hojouj Jum’a et al v. Libya
A.M.H. El Hojouj Jum a et al v. Libya CCPR/C/111/D/1958/2010 Communication number s : 1958/2010 Author: A.M.H. El Hojouj Jum a et al Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 111 Country Libya Submission date 31 Mar 2010 Date of decision 21 Jul 2014 JUTBCCPR/C/111/D/1958/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1849/en-US
A.M.M. v. Switzerland
A.M.M. v. Switzerland CERD/C/84/D/50/2012 Communication number s : 050/2012 Author: A.M.M. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 84 Country Switzerland Submission date 08 Jan 2012 Date of decision 18 Feb 2014 Comment: This document has no JUTBCERD/C/84/D/50/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1799/en-US
A.S. et al. v. Albania
A.S. et al. v. Albania CCPR/C/127/D/2444/2014 Communication number s : 2444/2014 Author: A.S. et al. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 127 Country Albania Submission date 21 Jul 2014 Date of decision 08 Nov 2019 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/127/D/2444/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2889/en-US
A.S. et al. v. Canada
A.S. et al. v. Canada CCPR/C/12/D/68/1980 Communication number s : 068/1980 Author: A.S. alleged victims mother and grandmother respectively Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 12 Country Canada Submission date 23 May 1980 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/12/D/68/1980https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/509/en-US
A.S. v. Nepal
A.S. v. Nepal CCPR/C/115/D/2077/2011 Communication number s : 2077/2011 Author: A.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 115 Country Nepal Submission date 22 Jul 2011 Date of decision 06 Nov 2015 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/115/D/2077/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2045/en-US
A.U. and H.R. v. New Zealand
A.U. and H.R. v. New Zealand CCPR/C/118/D/2567/2015 Communication number s : 2567/2015 Author: A.U. and H.R. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 118 Country New Zealand Submission date Date of decision Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/118/D/2567/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2233/en-US
A.V. v. Slovenia
A.V. v. Slovenia SVN 09/07/2019 00:00:00 25/07/2019 16:37:20 Case Description: Protection of family life: Disproportionate interference and failure of authorities to protect the applicant s right to contact with his three children due to the domestic EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52625
A.W.R.A.P. v. Denmark
A.W.R.A.P. v. Denmark CERD/C/71/D/37/2006 Communication number s : 037/2006 Author: A.W.R.A.P. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 71 Country Denmark Submission date 06 Jul 2006 Date of decision 08 Aug 2007 Comment: This document has no JUTBCERD/C/71/D/37/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1735/en-US
A.Y.O.AQ v. Italy
A.Y.O.AQ v. Italy CCPR/C/134/D/3587/2019 Communication number s : 3587/2019 Author: A.Y.O.AQ Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 134 Country Italy Submission date 02 May 2018 Date of decision 25 Mar 2022 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/134/D/3587/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3145/en-US
Aïcha Dehimi and Noura Ayache v. Algeria
A cha Dehimi and Noura Ayache v. Algeria CCPR/C/112/D/2086/2011 Communication number s : 2086/2011 Author: A cha Dehimi and Noura Ayache represented by Philippe Grant of Track Impunity Always TRIAL a Swiss association against impunity Type of decision: JUTBCCPR/C/112/D/2086/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1911/en-US
ABDURRAHMAN TEKIN v. Turkey
ABDURRAHMAN TEKIN v. Turkey TUR 25/09/2018 00:00:00 10/10/2018 10:41:00 Case Description: Freedom of assembly and protection against ill treatment: Disproportionate interference due to the prosecution of participants in peaceful assemblies and use of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50395
ABU ZUBAYDAH v. Lithuania
ABU ZUBAYDAH v. Lithuania LTU 08/10/2018 00:00:00 03/12/2018 15:46:42 Case Description: The case concerns violations of a number of Convention rights on account of the fact that the applicant was the victim of an extraordinary rendition operation. The EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50865
AGAOGLU v. Turkey
AGAOGLU v. Turkey TUR 06/03/2006 00:00:00 09/11/2016 15:26:10 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings on the ground of lacking independence and impartiality of the state security court on account of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-34949
AGOUDIMOS & CEFALLONIAN SKY SHIPPING COMPANY v. Greece
AGOUDIMOS CEFALLONIAN SKY SHIPPING COMPANY v. Greece GRC 28/09/2001 00:00:00 07/11/2016 09:36:22 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Legislative interference during proceedings before the Court of Cassation which determined EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-22178
AGRATI AND OTHERS v. Italy
AGRATI AND OTHERS v. Italy ITA 28/11/2011 00:00:00 08/11/2016 09:13:26 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the retroactive application of Law No. 266/2005 to pending judicial proceedings concerning the approximately 310 applicants length of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28264
AGROKOMPLEKS v. Ukraine
AGROKOMPLEKS v. Ukraine UKR 08/03/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Unfair insolvency proceedings against an oil refinery in which the State was a major shareholder due to the lack of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31565
AGURDINO S.R.L. v. the Republic of Moldova
AGURDINO S.R.L. v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 27/12/2011 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:43:32 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice and protection of property: Quashing of final domestic judgments in the applicants favour through the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13647
AHMET YILDIRIM v. Turkey
AHMET YILDIRIM v. Turkey TUR 18/03/2013 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:53:30 Case Description: These cases concern a violation of the applicants right to freedom of expression on account of domestic court orders blocking access to Google Sites and YouTube EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37256
AKOPYAN v. Ukraine
AKOPYAN v. Ukraine UKR 05/09/2014 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention and of family life: Unlawful and lengthy involuntary confinement in a psychiatric hospital following a wrong diagnosis and lack of effective EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31202