Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 4841 - 4860 of 5339
Rudyard Bessis v. France
Rudyard Bessis v. France CCPR/C/131/D/2988/2017 Communication number s : 2988/2017 Author: Philippe Rudyard Bessis Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 131 Country France Submission date 01 Mar 2017 Date of decision 24 Mar 2021 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/131/D/2988/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3235/en-US
Ruzimatov et al v. Turkmenistan
Ruzimatov et al v. Turkmenistan CCPR/C/136/D/3285/2019 Communication number s : 3285/2019 Author: Rashid Ruzimatov Irina Kakabaeva and Rakhim Ruzimatov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 136 Country Turkmenistan Submission date 09 Jul 2018 JUTBCCPR/C/136/D/3285/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3724/en-US
S.A., and Z. v. Netherlands
S.A. and Z. v. Netherlands CCPR/C/126/D/2683/2015 Communication number s : 2683/2015 Author: S.A. on behalf of herself and her minor daughter Z Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 126 Country Netherlands Submission date 04 Sep 2015 Date JUTBCCPR/C/126/D/2683/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2783/en-US
S.C.S. v. France
S.C.S. v. France CRC/C/77/D/10/2017 Communication number s : 010/2017 Author: S.C.S. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 77 Country France Submission date 05 Jan 2017 Date of decision 25 Jan 2018 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCRC/C/77/D/10/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2346/en-US
S. C. and G. P. v. Italy
S. C. and G. P. v. Italy E/C.12/65/D/22/2017 Communication number s : 022/2017 Author: S. C. and G. P. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 65 Country Italy Submission date 20 Mar 2017 Date of decision 07 Mar 2019 Comment: This document has no JUTBE/C.12/65/D/22/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2522/en-US
S.D.P.T., Y.F.R.T. and P.T. v. Canada
S.D.P.T. Y.F.R.T. and P.T. v. Canada CCPR/C/125/D/2034/2011 Communication number s : 2034/2011 Author: S.D.P.T. Y.F.R.T. and P.T. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 125 Country Canada Submission date 27 Mar 2011 Date of decision 29 Mar JUTBCCPR/C/125/D/2034/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3083/en-US
S.F.M. v. Spain
S.F.M. v. Spain CEDAW/C/75/D/138/2018 Communication number s : 138/2018 Author: S.F.M. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 75 Country Spain Submission date Date of decision 28 Feb 2020 Comment: Obstetric violence Substantive issues: gender JUTBCEDAW/C/75/D/138/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2710/en-US
S.H. v. Finland
S.H. v. Finland CCPR/C/128/D/2381/2014 Communication number s : 2381/2014 Author: S.H. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 128 Country Finland Submission date 10 Apr 2014 Date of decision 13 Mar 2020 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/128/D/2381/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2867/en-US
S. I. D. et al. v. Bulgaria
S. I. D. et al. v. Bulgaria CCPR/C/111/D/1926/2010 Communication number s : 1926/2010 Author: S. I. D. et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 111 Country Bulgaria Submission date 21 Sep 2009 Date of decision 21 Jul 2014 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/111/D/1926/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1846/en-US
S.I. v. Slovenia
S.I. v. Slovenia SVN 13/01/2012 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:31:49 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Disproportionate interference as a result of the excessive length of proceedings concerning custody and visiting rights relating to the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7142
S.M. v. Bosnia and Herzegovina
S.M. v. Bosnia and Herzegovina CCPR/C/135/D/3154/2018 Communication number s : 3154/2018 Author: S.M. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 135 Country Bosnia and Herzegovina Submission date 11 Aug 2017 Date of decision 08 Jul 2022 JUTBCCPR/C/135/D/3154/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3674/en-US
S.N., E.R. v. North Macedonia
S.N. E.R. v. North Macedonia CEDAW/C/75/D/107/2016 Communication number s : 107/2016 Author: S.N. E.R. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 75 Country North Macedonia Submission date Date of decision 24 Feb 2020 Comment: This document has no JUTBCEDAW/C/75/D/107/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2703/en-US
S.O. v. Canada
S.O. v. Canada CEDAW/C/59/D/49/2013 Communication number s : 049/2013 Author: S.O. represented by counsel William Sloan Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 59 Country Canada Submission date 21 Feb 2013 Date of decision 27 Oct 2014 JUTBCEDAW/C/59/D/49/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1881/en-US
S.W. v. the United Kingdom
S.W. v. the United Kingdom GBR 22/09/2021 00:00:00 04/10/2021 09:59:18 Case Description: The case concerns the failure to let the applicant a social worker meet allegations of professional misconduct made by a Family Court judge in 2014 during a trial EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58567
SABANCHIYEVA AND OTHERS v. Russia
SABANCHIYEVA AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 06/09/2013 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: These cases concern the authorities refusal to return the bodies of the applicants relatives who were local insurgents and were killed during anti terrorist EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13934
SAMOILA AND CIONCA v. Romania
SAMOILA AND CIONCA v. Romania ROU 04/06/2008 00:00:00 06/11/2016 15:17:22 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Failure to bring arrested applicants promptly before the judge refusal of competent court to review the lawfulness of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-16653
SATIK v. Turkey (no 2)
SATIK v. Turkey no 2 TUR 08/10/2008 00:00:00 10/11/2016 11:41:27 Case Description: Freedom of expression and access to and efficient functioning of justice: Disproportionate interference due to the applicant s conviction for expressing non violent EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-36778
SAYGILI AND BILGIC v. Turkey
SAYGILI AND BILGIC v. Turkey TUR 20/08/2010 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:53:30 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to the closure of a newspaper for a period of 30 days which was erroneously considered to be the successor EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37244
SEDLETSKA v. Ukraine
SEDLETSKA v. Ukraine UKR 01/07/2021 00:00:00 06/08/2021 16:42:52 Case Description: The case concerns an interference with the journalist s right to the protection of her sources in 2018 due to judicially authorised access to her mobile telephone EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58305
SENEGAL: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
SENEGAL: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CCPR/C/SEN/CO/5 NULL 2019 12 11T00:00:00 CCPR United Nations CCPR/C/SEN/CO/5 International Covenant on Distr.: General 11 December 2019 Civil and Political Rights English Original: French Human Rights Committee Concluding UHRICCPR/C/SEN/CO/5https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/9303ca3f-bc2e-4e18-a5c3-e3043e8402c2