Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 141 - 160 of 270
CASE OF LUPSA v. ROMANIA
CASE OF LUPSA v. ROMANIA 10337/04 IORDACHE E. DRAGOMIR D. ROU 6/8/2006 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 8 Violation of P7 1 Remainder inadmissible Pecuniary and non pecuniary damage financial award Costs and expenses partial award domestic and Convention ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0608JUD001033704https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-75688
CASE OF LYSYUK v. UKRAINE
CASE OF LYSYUK v. UKRAINE 72531/13 KYCHENOK A.S. UKR 10/14/2021 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Art. 35 1 Six month period Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1014JUD007253113https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-212137
CASE OF M.A.K. AND R.K. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF M.A.K. AND R.K. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 45901/05 40146/06 SYKES J. MOLE N. GBR 3/23/2010 12:00:00 AM Reminder inadmissible Violation of Art. 8 Violation of Art. 13 Pecuniary and non pecuniary damage award Section 8 of the Family Reform Act 1969 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0323JUD004590105https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-97880
CASE OF M.C. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF M.C. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 51220/13 CRAGG S. GBR 3/30/2021 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Article 35 1 Six month period Article 35 3 a Manifestly ill founded Ratione personae No violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0330JUD005122013https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-208876
CASE OF M.D. AND OTHERS v. SPAIN
CASE OF M.D. AND OTHERS v. SPAIN 36584/17 VAN DEN EYNDE ADROER A. ESP 6/28/2022 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Art. 35 3 a Manifestly ill founded Violation of Article 8 Right to ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0628JUD003658417https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-218034
CASE OF M.K. v. FRANCE
CASE OF M.K. v. FRANCE 19522/09 MEYER C. FRA 4/18/2013 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 1 Respect for private life 451 429 268 329 319 14 238 354 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0418JUD001952209https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-119075
CASE OF M.M. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF M.M. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 24029/07 KENNEDY B. GBR 11/13/2012 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Article 35 1 Effective domestic remedy Violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 1 Respect for private ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1113JUD002402907https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-114517
CASE OF MAKSYM v. POLAND
CASE OF MAKSYM v. POLAND 14450/02 N/A POL 12/19/2006 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 8 Violation of Art. 34 Pecuniary damage claim dismissed Non pecuniary damage financial award 183 177 451 319 424 216 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1219JUD001445002 FOURTH SECTION CASE ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1219JUD001445002https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-78580
CASE OF MALONE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF MALONE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 8691/79 N/A GBR 8/2/1984 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 8 Not necessary to examine Art. 13 Just satisfaction reserved Post Office Act 1969 Section 80 451 429 424 203 319 268 329 333 444 110 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1984:0802JUD000869179https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57533
CASE OF MARGARETA AND ROGER ANDERSSON v. SWEDEN
CASE OF MARGARETA AND ROGER ANDERSSON v. SWEDEN 12963/87 N/A SWE 2/25/1992 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 1 Respect for correspondence Respect for family life No violation of Article 13 Right to ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1992:0225JUD001296387https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57748
CASE OF MARIĆ v. CROATIA
CASE OF MARI v. CROATIA 50132/12 MAROVIC P. HRV 6/12/2014 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Article 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 1 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0612JUD005013212https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-144681
CASE OF MASKHADOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
CASE OF MASKHADOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA 18071/05 INTERIGHTS RUS 6/6/2013 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Article 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies No violation of Article 2 Right to life Article 2 1 Effective investigation Procedural aspect ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0606JUD001807105https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-120068
CASE OF MASLÁK v. SLOVAKIA (No. 2)
CASE OF MASL K v. SLOVAKIA No. 2 38321/17 TOMAN R. SVK 3/31/2022 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Manifestly ill founded Art. 35 3 a Ratione materiae Violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0331JUD003832117https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-216775
CASE OF MASTEPAN v. RUSSIA
CASE OF MASTEPAN v. RUSSIA 3708/03 TURUSHCHUKOV Y. RUS 1/14/2010 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 8 Article 178 of the RSFSR Code of Criminal Procedure Law of 27 October 1960 238 354 451 203 268 329 319 426 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0114JUD000370803 FIRST SECTION ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0114JUD000370803https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-96693
CASE OF MATWIEJCZUK v. POLAND
CASE OF MATWIEJCZUK v. POLAND 37641/97 N/A POL 12/2/2003 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 5 3 Violation of Art. 6 1 Violation of Art. 8 with regard to monitoring of correspondence Not necessary to examine Art. 34 No violation of Art. 8 with regard to delay ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:1202JUD003764197https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-61482
CASE OF MEHMET NURİ ÖZEN AND OTHERS v. TURKEY [Extracts]
CASE OF MEHMET NUR ZEN AND OTHERS v. TURKEY Extracts 15672/08 24462/08 27559/08 28302/08 28312/08 34823/08 40738/08 41124/08 43197/08 51938/08 58170/08 VARGUN M. TUR 1/11/2011 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 8 Non pecuniary damage finding of violation ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0111JUD001567208https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-102711
CASE OF MEIMANIS v. LATVIA
CASE OF MEIMANIS v. LATVIA 70597/11 VARPINS S. LVA 7/21/2015 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Article 35 3 Manifestly ill founded Ratione personae Violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 1 Respect for correspondence ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0721JUD007059711https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-156267
CASE OF MENNESSON v. FRANCE [Extracts]
CASE OF MENNESSON v. FRANCE Extracts 65192/11 SPINOSI P. FRA 6/26/2014 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible No violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 1 Respect for family life Violation of Article 8 Right to respect ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0626JUD006519211https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-145389
CASE OF MESSINA v. ITALY (No. 2)
CASE OF MESSINA v. ITALY No. 2 25498/94 N/A ITA 9/28/2000 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 8 on account of restrictions on visits by family Violation of Art. 8 on account of censorship of correspondence Violation of Art. 13 Non pecuniary damage finding of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0928JUD002549894https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58818
CASE OF MIAILHE v. FRANCE (No. 1)
CASE OF MIAILHE v. FRANCE No. 1 12661/87 N/A FRA 2/25/1993 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection rejected non exhaustion Violation of Art. 8 Not necessary to examine Art. 13 Just satisfaction reserved Customs Code Articles 64 453 454 458 Budget Act of 30 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1993:0225JUD001266187https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57811