Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 101 - 120 of 7304
Aouali, Faraoun and Bouregba v. Algeria
Aouali Faraoun and Bouregba v. Algeria CCPR/C/109/D/1884/2009 Communication number s : 1884/2009 Author: Mouni Aouali Feryale Faraoun and Fatiha Bouregba Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 109 Country Algeria Submission date Date of decision JUTBCCPR/C/109/D/1884/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1687/en-US
Assenova Naidenova et al. v. Bulgaria
Assenova Naidenova et al. v. Bulgaria CCPR/C/106/D/2073/2011 Communication number s : 2073/2011 Author: Liliana Assenova Naidenova et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 106 Country Bulgaria Submission date 25 Jun 2011 Date of decision 30 JUTBCCPR/C/106/D/2073/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1464/en-US
Aung v. Canada
Aung v. Canada CAT/C/36/D/273/2005 Communication number s : 273/2005 Author: Thu Aung Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 36 Country Canada Submission date 13 Jul 2005 Date of decision 15 May 2006 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/36/D/273/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/117/en-US
Aytulun and Guclu v. Sweden,Türkiye
Aytulun and Guclu v. Sweden T rkiye CAT/C/45/D/373/2009 Communication number s : 373/2009 Author: Munir Aytulun and Lilav Guclu Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 45 Country Sweden T rkiye Submission date 27 Jan 2009 Date of decision 19 Nov JUTBCAT/C/45/D/373/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/61/en-US
B.H. v. Austria
B.H. v. Austria CCPR/C/119/D/2088/2011 Communication number s : 2088/2011 Author: B.H. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 119 Country Austria Submission date 14 Feb 2005 Date of decision 28 Mar 2017 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/119/D/2088/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2257/en-US
B.P. and P.B. v. Netherlands
B.P. and P.B. v. Netherlands CCPR/C/128/D/2974/2017 Communication number s : 2974/2017 Author: B.P. and P.B. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 128 Country Netherlands Submission date 15 Oct 2016 Date of decision 13 Mar 2020 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/128/D/2974/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2866/en-US
B.S.S. v. Canada
B.S.S. v. Canada CAT/C/32/D/183/2001 Communication number s : 183/2001 Author: B.S.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 32 Country Canada Submission date 07 Mar 2001 Date of decision 12 May 2004 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/32/D/183/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/149/en-US
B.S. and N.K. v. Canada
B.S. and N.K. v. Canada CAT/C/71/D/798/2017 Communication number s : 798/2017 Author: B.S. and N.K. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 71 Country Canada Submission date 13 Jan 2017 Date of decision 23 Jul 2020 Comment: Individual JUTBCAT/C/71/D/798/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3425/en-US
B.S. v. Austria
B.S. v. Austria CAT/C/75/D/1118/2022 Communication number s : 1118/2022 Author: B.S. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 75 Country Austria Submission date 08 Dec 2021 Date of decision 04 Nov 2022 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/75/D/1118/2022https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3619/en-US
B.U. v. the Czech Republic
B.U. v. the Czech Republic CZE 06/01/2023 00:00:00 20/01/2023 18:00:32 Case Description: Investigation into the applicant s allegations of ill treatment by police while in detention at the Prague airport in October 2013 with a view of his expulsion did EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-62356
B.W.M.Z. v. Netherlands
B.W.M.Z. v. Netherlands CCPR/C/107/D/1788/2008 Communication number s : 1788/2008 Author: B.W.M.Z. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 107 Country Netherlands Submission date 26 Jun 2007 Date of decision 25 Mar 2013 Comment: Pursuant to JUTBCCPR/C/107/D/1788/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1331/en-US
B.Z. et al. v. Albania
B.Z. et al. v. Albania CCPR/C/121/D/2837/2016 Communication number s : 2837/2016 Author: B.Z. et al. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 121 Country Albania Submission date 13 Jan 2016 Date of decision 08 Nov 2017 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/121/D/2837/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2362/en-US
BAHRAIN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
BAHRAIN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CRC/C/BHR/CO/4 6 NULL 2019 02 27T00:00:00 CRC United Nations CRC/C/BHR/CO/4 6 Convention on the Distr.: General 27 February 2019 Rights of the Child Original: English Committee on the Rights of the Child Concluding UHRICRC/C/BHR/CO/4-6https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/a7e5b6f3-e35e-4031-8994-0fd536724a51
BAK v. Poland
BAK v. Poland POL 16/04/2007 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: The cases of Bak and Majewski concern the excessive length of criminal and civil proceedings respectively violations of Article 6 1 . They also concern certain problems in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20594
BAKIRDZI AND E.C. v. Hungary
BAKIRDZI AND E.C. v. Hungary HUN 03/04/2023 00:00:00 21/04/2023 14:55:17 Case Description: This case concerns the discriminatory restriction of the voting rights of the applicants members of recognised national minorities Greek and Armenian due to the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-63069
BALAJEVS v. Latvia
BALAJEVS v. Latvia LVA 28/07/2016 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:30:55 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment: Ill treatment of prisoners by escort officers in the premises of the Riga Regional Court in and lack of effective investigations. Article 3 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12668
BALITSKIY v. Ukraine
BALITSKIY v. Ukraine UKR 03/02/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the convictions of the applicants between 2002 and 2011 on the basis of self incriminating statements made in the absence of a lawyer and in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31116
BALOGH AND OTHERS v. Slovakia
BALOGH AND OTHERS v. Slovakia SVK 04/02/2019 00:00:00 25/02/2019 15:58:10 Case Description: These cases concern proceedings for the restitution of land which had lasted 13 and 29 years respectively and were still ongoing. The European Court found that the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-51541
BALSAN v. Romania
BALSAN v. Romania ROU 23/08/2017 00:00:00 15/09/2017 15:07:24 Case Description: This case concerns the failure of the investigating prosecuting and judicial authorities to comply with their positive obligation under Article 3 to protect the applicant from EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47601
BANGLADESH: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
BANGLADESH: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CRPD/C/BGD/CO/1 NULL 2022 10 11T00:00:00 CRPD United Nations CRPD/C/BGD/CO/1 Convention on the Rights Distr.: General 11 October 2022 of Persons with Disabilities Original: English Committee on the Rights of Persons UHRICRPD/C/BGD/CO/1https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/bd2f6d1f-fe35-4fa7-9485-6afdf2da6256