Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 241 - 260 of 2509
CAKA v. Albania
CAKA v. Albania ALB 08/03/2010 00:00:00 24/10/2016 16:48:47 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings leading to convictions to terms of imprisonment with regard to following shortcomings: failure to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-233
CALLEJA v. Malta
CALLEJA v. Malta MLT 07/07/2005 00:00:00 27/10/2016 16:13:19 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention and access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of detention on remand without adequate reasons and of criminal EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4073
CALOC v. France
CALOC v. France FRA 20/07/2000 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:02:39 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of criminal proceedings to which the applicant was a civil party. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-32104
CAMASSO v. Croatia
CAMASSO v. Croatia HRV 13/04/2005 00:00:00 03/11/2016 16:22:41 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of criminal proceedings. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: Individual EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12251
CAMLAR v. Turkey
CAMLAR v. Turkey TUR 10/02/2016 00:00:00 10/11/2016 11:17:48 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: denial of a fair trial by an independent and impartial court on account of the presence of a military judge on the bench of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-36671
CANADY v. Slovakia
CANADY v. Slovakia SVK 30/03/2005 00:00:00 02/11/2016 13:55:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Lack of access to an independent and impartial tribunal following the imposition of a fine by the administrative authorities. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7911
CANADY v. Slovakia (no. 2)
CANADY v. Slovakia no. 2 SVK 20/01/2010 00:00:00 02/11/2016 13:55:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Lack of access to an independent and impartial tribunal following the imposition of a fine by the administrative EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-8143
CANCIOVICI AND OTHERS v. Romania
CANCIOVICI AND OTHERS v. Romania ROU 24/09/2003 00:00:00 06/11/2016 15:17:22 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Lack of access to a court due to the court of appeal s dismissal of the applicants claim claims concerning the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-16011
CANKOCAK v. Turkey
CANKOCAK v. Turkey TUR 20/05/2001 00:00:00 07/11/2016 17:30:19 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of criminal proceedings before Martial Law Courts jurisdiction abolished by law in 1993 and also partly EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-26806
CAPEAU v. Belgium
CAPEAU v. Belgium BEL 06/06/2005 00:00:00 25/10/2016 14:46:28 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Breach of the presumption of innocence on account of the Ministry of Justice s refusal upheld by the Appeals Board to grant a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1399
CAPITANI AND CAMPANELLA v. Italy
CAPITANI AND CAMPANELLA v. Italy ITA 17/08/2011 00:00:00 28/11/2016 10:48:54 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Impossibility to request a public hearing in proceedings with regard to preventive measures aimed at the seizure EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-44725
CARAIAN v. Romania
CARAIAN v. Romania ROU 19/10/2015 00:00:00 06/11/2016 16:19:47 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Breach of the presumption of innocence in criminal proceedings terminated by a prosecutor s decision on grounds that they were EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17595
CARIC v. Croatia
CARIC v. Croatia HRV 24/04/2014 00:00:00 03/11/2016 15:28:29 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of civil proceedings due to the comparatively low level of compensation awarded by the Constitutional Court. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12069
CARMEL SALIBA v. Malta
CARMEL SALIBA v. Malta MLT 24/04/2017 00:00:00 24/05/2017 17:23:22 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair civil proceedings concerning civil liability for a robbery due to the combination of procedural shortcomings EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46865
CASE OF A AND B v. NORWAY
CASE OF A AND B v. NORWAY 24130/11 29758/11 KJELDAHL R. NOR 11/15/2016 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 Right not to be tried or punished twice general Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 Right not to be tried or punished twice Criminal ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1115JUD002413011https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-168972
CASE OF A. AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF A. AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 3455/05 BIRNBERG PIERCE AND PARTNERS GBR 2/19/2009 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 3 No violation of Art. 13 3 Preliminary objection rejected Government not precluded from raising defence under Art. 5 1 f or ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0219JUD000345505https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-91403
CASE OF ADALI v. TURKEY
CASE OF ADALI v. TURKEY 38187/97 BINDMAN PARTNERS MESSRS TUR 3/31/2005 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Article 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies No violation of Article 2 Right to life Article 2 1 Life Substantive aspect Violation of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0331JUD003818797https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-68670
CASE OF ADVANCE PHARMA SP. Z O.O v. POLAND
CASE OF ADVANCE PHARMA SP. Z O.O v. POLAND 1469/20 G SIOROWSKA M. METELSKA J. POL 2/3/2022 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Violation of Article 6 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0203JUD000146920https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-215388
CASE OF AGEYEVY v. RUSSIA
CASE OF AGEYEVY v. RUSSIA 7075/10 MEMORIAL HUMAN RIGHTS CENTRE HUMAN RIGHTS ADVOCACY CENTRE RUS 4/18/2013 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible No violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 Positive obligations Article 8 1 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0418JUD000707510https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-118602
CASE OF AL-DULIMI AND MONTANA MANAGEMENT INC. v. SWITZERLAND
CASE OF AL DULIMI AND MONTANA MANAGEMENT INC. v. SWITZERLAND 5809/08 MICHEL J. C. OBEIDAT T. FRIES S. CHE 6/21/2016 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Ratione personae Preliminary objection dismissed ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0621JUD000580908https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-164515