Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 563
2nd RC4 Spain
2nd RC4 Spain ESP 2021 03 25 2021 09 30 I. INTRODUCTION The Fourth Round Evaluation Report on Spain was adopted at GRECO s 62nd Plenary Meeting 6 December 2013 and made public on 15 January 2014 following authorisation by Spain. The Fourth Evaluation GRECOGrecoRC4(2021)3-Final-eng-Spain-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=GrecoRC4(2021)3-Final-eng-Spain-PUBLIC
A/HRC/47/15: Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review - Georgia
United Nations A/HRC/47/15 General Assembly Distr.: General 1 April 2021 Original: English Human Rights Council Forty seventh session 21 June 9 July 2021 Agenda item 6 Universal periodic review Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review UPRA/HRC/47/15https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/country-reports/ahrc4715-report-working-group-universal-periodic-review-georgia
A/HRC/47/19: Operations of the Voluntary Fund for Financial and Technical Assistance in the Implementation of the Universal Periodic Review Report of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner forHuman Rights
United Nations A/HRC/47/19 General Assembly Distr.: General 28 April 2021 Original: English Human Rights Council Forty seventh session 21 June 9 July 2021 Agenda items 2 and 6 Annual report of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights and UPRA/HRC/47/19https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/reports/ahrc4719-operations-voluntary-fund-financial-and-technical-assistance
A.K. v. Liechtenstein
A.K. v. Liechtenstein LIE 09/10/2015 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:30:30 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Objectively justified doubts in respect of the impartiality of the five judges in view of the procedure they had chosen to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-91
ADDENDUM TO THE SECOND COMPLIANCE REPORT ON ICELAND
ADDENDUM TO THE SECOND COMPLIANCE REPORT ON ICELAND ISL 2019 06 21 2019 06 26 I. INTRODUCTION The Addendum to the Second Compliance Report assesses the measures taken by the authorities of Iceland to implement the pending recommendations issued in the GRECOGrecoRC4(2019)16-Final-eng-Iceland-Add2ndRC-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=GrecoRC4(2019)16-Final-eng-Iceland-Add2ndRC-PUBLIC
AGROKOMPLEKS v. Ukraine
AGROKOMPLEKS v. Ukraine UKR 08/03/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Unfair insolvency proceedings against an oil refinery in which the State was a major shareholder due to the lack of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31565
ALFATLI AND OTHERS v. Turkey
ALFATLI AND OTHERS v. Turkey TUR 02/10/2003 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:53:30 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: excessive length of the criminal proceedings before the Ankara Martial Law Court and partially before ordinary EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37208
ATCA AND OTHERS v. Turkey
ATCA AND OTHERS v. Turkey TUR 06/05/2003 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:10:46 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Lacking independence and impartiality of court due to the presence of a military judge on the bench of the state EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28913
AZERBAIJAN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
AZERBAIJAN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS E/C.12/AZE/CO/4 NULL 2021 11 02T00:00:00 CESCR United Nations E/C.12/AZE/CO/4 Economic and Social Council Distr.: General 2 November 2021 Original: English Committee on Economic Social and Cultural Rights Concluding UHRIE/C.12/AZE/CO/4https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/70fcaf4b-f336-4518-9d1b-9db47dc63e10
Adamovich v. Belarus
Adamovich v. Belarus CCPR/C/133/D/2619/2015 Communication number s : 2619/2015 Author: Marina Adamovich Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 133 Country Belarus Submission date 15 Nov 2013 Date of decision 26 Oct 2021 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/133/D/2619/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3156/en-US
BAK v. Poland
BAK v. Poland POL 16/04/2007 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: The cases of Bak and Majewski concern the excessive length of criminal and civil proceedings respectively violations of Article 6 1 . They also concern certain problems in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20594
BEAUSOLEIL v. France
BEAUSOLEIL v. France FRA 06/01/2017 00:00:00 01/02/2017 17:08:50 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Lack of impartiality of the Court of Audit when determining the final balance of accounts in a case concerning the de facto EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-45969
BLESA RODRÍGUEZ v. Spain
BLESA RODR GUEZ v. Spain ESP 01/03/2016 00:00:00 02/11/2016 09:41:36 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings due to fact that one of three judges on the bench did not meet the criteria of objective EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5792
BOYAN GOSPODINOV v. Bulgaria
BOYAN GOSPODINOV v. Bulgaria BGR 10/09/2018 00:00:00 24/09/2018 15:23:04 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings as the first instance court in a second criminal trial against the applicant had failed EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50265
BOYLE v. the United Kingdom
BOYLE v. the United Kingdom GBR 08/04/2008 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention and access to and efficient functioning of justice: Detention decided in the Army by the Commanding Officer who does not present EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2674
BRUDNICKA AND OTHERS v. Poland
BRUDNICKA AND OTHERS v. Poland POL 03/06/2005 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:13:46 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair proceedings to determine the cause of a shipwreck due to lacking independence and impartiality of maritime EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-18121
BULGARIA: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
BULGARIA: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CCPR/C/BGR/CO/4 NULL 2018 11 15T00:00:00 CCPR United Nations CCPR/C/BGR/CO/4 International Covenant on Distr.: General 15 November 2018 Civil and Political Rights Original: English Human Rights Committee Concluding UHRICCPR/C/BGR/CO/4https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/0f805209-6d8b-4da5-aaca-58d2128cac00
CASE OF A AND B v. CROATIA
CASE OF A AND B v. CROATIA 7144/15 BOJIC I. VRANJICAN DEREK T. DRENSKI LASAN V. HRV 6/20/2019 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Effective investigation Procedural aspect No violation of Article 8 Right to respect for ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0620JUD000714415https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-194217
CASE OF ADŽIĆ v. CROATIA
CASE OF AD I v. CROATIA 22643/14 BOJIC I. HRV 3/12/2015 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 Positive obligations Article 8 1 Respect for family life 451 634 425 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0312JUD002264314 FIRST ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0312JUD002264314https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-152731
CASE OF ADALI v. TURKEY
CASE OF ADALI v. TURKEY 38187/97 BINDMAN PARTNERS MESSRS TUR 3/31/2005 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Article 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies No violation of Article 2 Right to life Article 2 1 Life Substantive aspect Violation of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0331JUD003818797https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-68670