Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 3078
2nd RC4 Spain
2nd RC4 Spain ESP 2021 03 25 2021 09 30 I. INTRODUCTION The Fourth Round Evaluation Report on Spain was adopted at GRECO s 62nd Plenary Meeting 6 December 2013 and made public on 15 January 2014 following authorisation by Spain. The Fourth Evaluation GRECOGrecoRC4(2021)3-Final-eng-Spain-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=GrecoRC4%282021%293-Final-eng-Spain-PUBLIC
A. AND E. RIIS v. Norway
A. AND E. RIIS v. Norway NOR 31/08/2007 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:39:43 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of certain civil proceedings. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-193
A.B. v. Slovakia
A.B. v. Slovakia SVK 04/06/2003 00:00:00 02/11/2016 13:55:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Infringement of the right to present one s case on equal terms with the defendant in that without a formal and reasoned decision EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7855
A.C. v. France
A.C. v. France FRA 10/08/1995 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:51:28 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings before a court of appeal which had sentenced the applicant in absentia and where his lawyer was not EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31433
A/HRC/47/12: Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review - Austria
United Nations A/HRC/47/12 General Assembly Distr.: General 9 April 2021 Original: English Human Rights Council Forty seventh session 21 June 9 July 2021 Agenda item 6 Universal periodic review Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review UPRA/HRC/47/12https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/country-reports/ahrc4712-report-working-group-universal-periodic-review-austria
A/HRC/47/15: Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review - Georgia
United Nations A/HRC/47/15 General Assembly Distr.: General 1 April 2021 Original: English Human Rights Council Forty seventh session 21 June 9 July 2021 Agenda item 6 Universal periodic review Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review UPRA/HRC/47/15https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/country-reports/ahrc4715-report-working-group-universal-periodic-review-georgia
A/HRC/47/4: Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review - Federated States of Micronesia
United Nations A/HRC/47/4 General Assembly Distr.: General 26 March 2021 Original: English Human Rights Council Forty seventh session 21 June 9 July 2021 Agenda item 6 Universal periodic review Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review UPRA/HRC/47/4https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/country-reports/ahrc474-report-working-group-universal-periodic-review-federated-states
A/HRC/47/5: Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review - Lebanon
United Nations A/HRC/47/5 General Assembly Distr.: General 7 April 2021 Original: English Human Rights Council Forty seventh session 21 June 9 July 2021 Agenda item 6 Universal periodic review Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review UPRA/HRC/47/5https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/country-reports/ahrc475-report-working-group-universal-periodic-review-lebanon
A/HRC/47/8: Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review - Australia
United Nations A/HRC/47/8 General Assembly Distr.: General 24 March 2021 Original: English Human Rights Council Forty seventh session 21 June 9 July 2021 Agenda item 6 Universal periodic review Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review UPRA/HRC/47/8https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/country-reports/ahrc478-report-working-group-universal-periodic-review-australia
A.M. v. Australia
A.M. v. Australia CRPD/C/13/D/12/2013 Communication number s : 012/2013 Author: Australian Centre for Disability Law Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 13 Country Australia Submission date 18 Apr 2013 Date of decision 27 Mar 2015 JUTBCRPD/C/13/D/12/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2009/en-US
A.N. v. Lithuania
A.N. v. Lithuania LTU 31/08/2016 00:00:00 27/10/2016 16:57:59 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and protection of private life: Absence of proper procedural safeguards in proceedings to deprive a person suffering from mental EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4347
A.S. v. Nepal
A.S. v. Nepal CCPR/C/115/D/2077/2011 Communication number s : 2077/2011 Author: A.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 115 Country Nepal Submission date 22 Jul 2011 Date of decision 06 Nov 2015 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/115/D/2077/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2045/en-US
A.T. v. Austria
A.T. v. Austria AUT 21/06/2002 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Lack of a public oral hearing in compensation proceedings for defamation under the Media Act. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-847
A.T. v. Luxembourg
A.T. v. Luxembourg LUX 14/09/2015 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:38:37 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Lack of assistance by a lawyer during police hearing and lack of communication between the applicant and his lawyer before the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-165
ABBATIELLO v. Italy
ABBATIELLO v. Italy ITA 20/12/2007 00:00:00 28/11/2016 10:46:44 Case Description: Protection of private life: Limitations of personal capacity in bankruptcy proceedings after the closure of bankruptcy proceedings and impossibility of obtaining EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-44521
ABDELALI v. France
ABDELALI v. France FRA 11/01/2013 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:01:18 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Refusal to allow a person convicted in absentia to raise a plea of nullity on the ground that he was absconding when the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28450
ABDULKADIR DEMIR v. Turkey
ABDULKADIR DEMIR v. Turkey TUR 09/10/2012 00:00:00 09/11/2016 15:45:01 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Non enforcement or delayed enforcement of domestic judicial decisions mostly delivered against entities owned or EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-35375
ABRAMCZYK v. Poland
ABRAMCZYK v. Poland POL 12/09/2007 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:10:55 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and protection of rights in detention: Excessive length of civil and criminal proceedings and lack of an effective remedy in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20363
ABRAMOVA v. Ukraine
ABRAMOVA v. Ukraine UKR 18/12/2018 00:00:00 07/01/2019 11:55:18 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of access to a court due to the courts failure to examine the applicant s defamation claim against the prosecutor s EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-51049
ACCARDO v. Italy
ACCARDO v. Italy ITA 17/03/2005 00:00:00 28/11/2016 10:46:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and protection of property: Sustained impossibility for the applicants to obtain the assistance of the police to implement EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-44132