Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 16 of 16
Anna Belousova v. Kazakhstan
Anna Belousova v. Kazakhstan CEDAW/C/61/D/45/2012 Communication number s : 045/2012 Author: Anna Belousova Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 61 Country Kazakhstan Submission date 12 Sep 2012 Date of decision 13 Jul 2015 Comment: This JUTBCEDAW/C/61/D/45/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2053/en-US
D.S. v. Slovakia
D.S. v. Slovakia CEDAW/C/65/D/66/2014 Communication number s : 66/2014 Author: D.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 65 Country Slovakia Submission date 08 Feb 2013 Date of decision 07 Nov 2016 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/65/D/66/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3451/en-US
Goekce v. Austria
Goekce v. Austria CEDAW/C/39/D/5/2005 Communication number s : 005/2005 Author: Hakan Goekce Handan Goekce and Guelue Goekce descendants of the deceased Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 39 Country Austria Submission date 21 Jul 2004 Date of JUTBCEDAW/C/39/D/5/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1715/en-US
McIvor and Grismer v. Canada
McIvor and Grismer v. Canada CCPR/C/124/D/2020/2010 Communication number s : 2020/2010 Author: Sharon McIvor and Jacob Grismer Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 124 Country Canada Submission date 24 Nov 2010 Date of decision 01 Nov 2018 JUTBCCPR/C/124/D/2020/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3081/en-US
O.G. v. Russian Federation
O.G. v. Russian Federation CEDAW/C/68/D/91/2015 Communication number s : 091/2015 Author: O.G. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 68 Country Russian Federation Submission date Date of decision 06 Nov 2017 Comment: This document has no JUTBCEDAW/C/68/D/91/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2429/en-US
O.M. v. Ukraine
O.M. v. Ukraine CEDAW/C/73/D/87/2015 Communication number s : 087/2015 Author: O.M. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 73 Country Ukraine Submission date 01 Sep 2014 Date of decision 19 Jul 2019 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/73/D/87/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2655/en-US
R.K.B. v. Türkiye
R.K.B. v. T rkiye CEDAW/C/51/D/28/2010 Communication number s : 028/2010 Author: R.K.B. represented by counsel Ozge Yildiz Arslan Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 51 Country T rkiye Submission date 14 Jul 2009 Date of decision 24 Feb 2012 JUTBCEDAW/C/51/D/28/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1720/en-US
Reyna Trujillo Reyes and Pedro Arguello Morales v. Mexico
Reyna Trujillo Reyes and Pedro Arguello Morales v. Mexico CEDAW/C/67/D/75/2014 Communication number s : 075/2014 Author: Reyna Trujillo Reyes and Pedro Arguello Morales Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 67 Country Mexico Submission date 01 JUTBCEDAW/C/67/D/75/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2249/en-US
S.B. and M.B. v. North Macedonia
S.B. and M.B. v. North Macedonia CEDAW/C/77/D/143/2019 Communication number s : 143/2019 Author: S.B. and M.B. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 77 Country North Macedonia Submission date 16 May 2019 Date of decision 02 Nov 2020 Comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/77/D/143/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3118/en-US
S.L. v. Bulgaria
S.L. v. Bulgaria CEDAW/C/73/D/99/2016 Communication number s : 099/2016 Author: S.L. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 73 Country Bulgaria Submission date 23 Feb 2016 Date of decision 19 Jul 2019 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/73/D/99/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2657/en-US
S.T. v. Russian Federation
S.T. v. Russian Federation CEDAW/C/72/D/65/2014 Communication number s : 065/2014 Author: S.T. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 72 Country Russian Federation Submission date 08 Nov 2013 Date of decision 25 Jan 2019 Comment: This document JUTBCEDAW/C/72/D/65/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2651/en-US
The Vienna Intervention Centre against Domestic Violence and the Association for Women's Access to Justice on behalf of Banu Akbak, Gülen Khan, and Melissa Özdemir (descendants of the deceased) v. Austria
The Vienna Intervention Centre against Domestic Violence and the Association for Women s Access to Justice on behalf of Banu Akbak G len Khan and Melissa zdemir descendants of the deceased v. Austria CEDAW/C/39/D/6/2005 Communication number s : 006/2005 JUTBCEDAW/C/39/D/6/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1711/en-US
Vos (Hendrika S.) v. Netherlands
Vos Hendrika S. v. Netherlands CCPR/C/35/D/218/1986 Communication number s : 218/1986 Author: Hendrika S. Vos Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 35 Country Netherlands Submission date 23 Dec 1986 Date of decision 29 Mar 1989 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/35/D/218/1986https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/540/en-US
X and Y v. Georgia
X and Y v. Georgia CEDAW/C/61/D/24/2009 Communication number s : 024/2009 Author: X and Y Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 61 Country Georgia Submission date 24 Jun 2009 Date of decision 13 Jul 2015 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/61/D/24/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2051/en-US
X. and Y. v. Russian Federation
X. and Y. v. Russian Federation CEDAW/C/73/D/100/2016 Communication number s : 100/2016 Author: X. and Y. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 73 Country Russian Federation Submission date 29 Dec 2015 Date of decision 16 Jul 2019 Comment: This JUTBCEDAW/C/73/D/100/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2658/en-US
Zwaan-de Vries v. Netherlands
Zwaan de Vries v. Netherlands CCPR/C/29/D/182/1984 Communication number s : 182/1984 Author: F.H. Zwaan de Vries Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 29 Country Netherlands Submission date 28 Sep 1984 Date of decision 09 Apr 1987 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/29/D/182/1984https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/532/en-US