Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 620
4. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 4. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights New York 16 December 1966 Entry into force : 23 March 1976 in accordance with article 49 for all provisions except those of article 41 UNIV-4https://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-4&chapter=4&clang=_en
A.B. v. Finland
A.B. v. Finland CRC/C/86/D/51/2018 Communication number s : 051/2018 Author: A.B. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 86 Country Finland Submission date 27 Jun 2018 Date of decision 04 Feb 2021 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCRC/C/86/D/51/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2946/en-US
A.F. v. Italy
A.F. v. Italy CEDAW/C/82/D/148/2019 Communication number s : 148/2019 Author: A.F. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 82 Country Italy Submission date 16 Aug 2018 Date of decision 20 Jun 2022 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCEDAW/C/82/D/148/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3205/en-US
A.H.G. v. Canada
A.H.G. v. Canada CCPR/C/113/D/2091/2011 Communication number s : 2091/2011 Author: A.H.G. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 113 Country Canada Submission date 28 Aug 2011 Date of decision 25 Mar 2015 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/113/D/2091/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1926/en-US
A. K. and A. R. v. Uzbekistan
A. K. and A. R. v. Uzbekistan CCPR/C/95/D/1233/2003 Communication number s : 1233/2003 Author: A. K. and A. R. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 95 Country Uzbekistan Submission date 09 Jul 2003 Date of decision 31 Mar 2009 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/95/D/1233/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1015/en-US
AL NASHIRI v. Romania
AL NASHIRI v. Romania ROU 08/10/2018 00:00:00 10/12/2018 09:38:46 Case Description: The case concerns violations of a number of Convention rights arising from the fact that the applicant was the victim of an extraordinary rendition operation. The European EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50873
ALTUG TANER AKCAM v. Turkey
ALTUG TANER AKCAM v. Turkey TUR 25/01/2012 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:45:20 Case Description: These groups mainly concern unjustified and disproportionate interferences with the applicants freedom of expression on account of criminal proceedings for having EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37188
ARTUN AND GUVENER v. Turkey
ARTUN AND GUVENER v. Turkey TUR 26/09/2007 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:22:51 Case Description: These groups mainly concern unjustified and disproportionate interferences with the applicants freedom of expression on account of criminal proceedings for having EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37417
Ali and Ali v. Norway
Ali and Ali v. Norway CCPR/C/135/D/2926/2017 Communication number s : 2926/2017 Author: Imran Ali and Bakhtaware Ali Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 135 Country Norway Submission date 04 Jan 2017 Date of decision 14 Jul 2022 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/135/D/2926/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3677/en-US
Alonzo et al. v. Philippines
Alonzo et al. v. Philippines CEDAW/C/84/D/155/2020 Communication number s : 155/2020 Author: Natalia M. Alonzo Perla B. Balingit Virginia M. Bangit Francia A. Buco Dela Paz B. Culala Belen Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 84 Country JUTBCEDAW/C/84/D/155/2020https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3765/en-US
BEIZARAS AND LEVICKAS v. Lithuania
BEIZARAS AND LEVICKAS v. Lithuania LTU 14/05/2020 00:00:00 12/06/2020 16:56:20 Case Description: This case concerns the refusal of the law enforcement agencies due to their discriminatory attitudes to launch an investigation into the applicants EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55375
BRAUER v. Germany
BRAUER v. Germany DEU 28/08/2009 00:00:00 15/11/2016 14:32:10 Case Description: Discrimination and protection of family life: Discriminatory interference with the right to family life in that the applicant born out of wedlock was unable to assert her EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-38440
Bekmanov and Egemberdiev v. Kyrgyzstan
Bekmanov and Egemberdiev v. Kyrgyzstan CCPR/C/125/D/2312/2013 Communication number s : 2312/2013 Author: Alymbek Bekmanov and Damirbek Egemberdiev Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 125 Country Kyrgyzstan Submission date 26 Mar 2013 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/125/D/2312/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3100/en-US
CASE OF A AND B v. CROATIA
CASE OF A AND B v. CROATIA 7144/15 BOJIC I. VRANJICAN DEREK T. DRENSKI LASAN V. HRV 6/20/2019 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Effective investigation Procedural aspect No violation of Article 8 Right to respect for ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0620JUD000714415https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-194217
CASE OF A.D. AND OTHERS v. GEORGIA
CASE OF A.D. AND OTHERS v. GEORGIA 57864/17 79087/17 55353/19 BAKHTADZE K. LEACH P. REMEZAITE R. GAVRON J. SAWYER J. CLIFFORD J. JOMARJIDZE N. ONIANI T. TABATADZE G. COJOCARIU C. LEVINE K. EVANS J. GEO 12/1/2022 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 8 Right to ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1201JUD005786417https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-221237
CASE OF A.E. v. BULGARIA
CASE OF A.E. v. BULGARIA 53891/20 DOBREVA N. BGR 5/23/2023 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0523JUD005389120https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-224778
CASE OF ČAČKO v. SLOVAKIA
CASE OF A KO v. SLOVAKIA 49905/08 KUZMA M. SVK 7/22/2014 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Degrading punishment Inhuman punishment Substantive aspect No violation of Article 13 3 Right to an effective remedy Article 13 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0722JUD004990508https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-145711
CASE OF A.N. v. UKRAINE
CASE OF A.N. v. UKRAINE 13837/09 UKR 1/29/2015 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Effective investigation Procedural aspect No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Degrading treatment Inhuman treatment ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0129JUD001383709https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-150651
CASE OF A.P., GARÇON AND NICOT v. FRANCE
CASE OF A.P. GAR ON AND NICOT v. FRANCE 79885/12 52471/13 52596/13 SCP GATINEAU FATTACCINI SCP THOUIN PALAT BOUCARD FOURNIER J. PIERRAT E. FRA 4/6/2017 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0406JUD007988512https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-172913
CASE OF ADŽIĆ v. CROATIA (No. 2)
CASE OF AD I v. CROATIA No. 2 19601/16 BOJIC I. HRV 5/2/2019 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 6 Right to a fair trial Article 6 Civil proceedings Article 6 1 Public hearing Violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 1 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0502JUD001960116https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-192786