Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 2991
A.A. v. Switzerland
A.A. v. Switzerland CAT/C/38/D/268/2005 Communication number s : 268/2005 Author: A.A. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 38 Country Switzerland Submission date 02 Feb 2005 Date of decision 01 May 2007 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/38/D/268/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/97/en-US
A.B.A. et al. v. Spain
A.B.A. et al. v. Spain CRC/C/91/D/114/2020 CRC/C/91/D/116/2020 Communication number s : 116/2020 117/2020 118/2020 114/2020 Author: A.B.A. and F.Z.A. F.E.M. and S.E.M. S.E.Y. and M.E.Y. and N.L. R.A. and M.A.A. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session JUTBCRC/C/91/D/114/2020, CRC/C/91/D/116/2020https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3715/en-US
A.B. v. Sweden
A.B. v. Sweden CAT/C/71/D/908/2019 Communication number s : 908/2019 Author: A.B. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 71 Country Sweden Submission date 04 Jan 2019 Date of decision 21 Jul 2021 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCAT/C/71/D/908/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3364/en-US
A. B. v. Sweden
A. B. v. Sweden CAT/C/54/D/539/2013 Communication number s : 539/2013 Author: A. B. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 54 Country Sweden Submission date 08 Mar 2013 Date of decision 11 May 2015 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/54/D/539/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2043/en-US
A.G. et al. v. Angola
A.G. et al. v. Angola CCPR/C/129/D/3106/2018 3122/2018 Communication number s : 3114/2018 3109/2018 3112/2018 3106/2018 3113/2018 3116/2018 3118/2018 3121/2018 3108/2018 3107/2018 3119/2018 3111/2018 3120/2018 3115/2018 3122/2018 3110/2018 3117/2018 JUTBCCPR/C/129/D/3106/2018-3122/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2864/en-US
A/HRC/27/56/Add.2
A/HRC/27/56/Add.2 A/HRC/27/56/Add.2 NULL 2014 08 28T00:00:00 SR Truth justice reparation Addendum Mission to Uruguay Summary The Special Rapporteur on the promotion of truth justice reparation and guarantees of non recurrence Pablo de Greiff paid an UHRIA/HRC/27/56/Add.2https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/8159e491-d477-481e-be72-8ac2a8107329
A.J.E. v. Sweden
A.J.E. v. Sweden CAT/C/71/D/874/2018 Communication number s : 874/2018 Author: A.J.E. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 71 Country Sweden Submission date 19 Apr 2018 Date of decision 22 Jul 2021 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/71/D/874/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3363/en-US
A.L. v. Italy
A.L. v. Italy CCPR/C/126/D/2570/2015 Communication number s : 2570/2015 Author: A.L. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 126 Country Italy Submission date 09 Oct 2014 Date of decision 26 Jul 2019 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/126/D/2570/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2894/en-US
A.M.B. v. Ecuador
A.M.B. v. Ecuador E/C.12/58/D/3/2014 Communication number s : 003/2014 Author: A.M.B. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 58 Country Ecuador Submission date Date of decision 20 Jun 2016 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBE/C.12/58/D/3/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2137/en-US
A. M. O. and J. M. U v. Spain
A. M. O. and J. M. U v. Spain E/C.12/68/D/45/2018 Communication number s : 045/2018 Author: A. M. O. and J. M. U Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 68 Virtual Session Country Spain Submission date Date of decision 13 Oct 2020 Comment: JUTBE/C.12/68/D/45/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2766/en-US
A.M. v. Australia
A.M. v. Australia CRPD/C/13/D/12/2013 Communication number s : 012/2013 Author: Australian Centre for Disability Law Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 13 Country Australia Submission date 18 Apr 2013 Date of decision 27 Mar 2015 JUTBCRPD/C/13/D/12/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2009/en-US
A.P. v. Finland
A.P. v. Finland CAT/C/60/D/465/2011 Communication number s : 465/2011 Author: A.P. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 60 Country Finland Submission date 14 Apr 2011 Date of decision 10 May 2017 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/60/D/465/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3432/en-US
A.S., D.I., O.I. and G.D. v. Italy
A.S. D.I. O.I. and G.D. v. Italy CCPR/C/130/D/3042/2017 Communication number s : 3042/2017 Author: A.S. D.I. O.I. and G.D. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 130 Country Italy Submission date 19 May 2017 Date of decision 04 Nov 2020 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/130/D/3042/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3275/en-US
A.S.M. and R.A.H. v. Denmark,Italy
A.S.M. and R.A.H. v. Denmark Italy CCPR/C/117/D/2378/2014 Communication number s : 2378/2014 Author: A.S.M. and R.A.H. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 117 Country Denmark Italy Submission date 14 Apr 2014 Date of decision 07 Jul 2016 JUTBCCPR/C/117/D/2378/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2245/en-US
A v. Bosnia and Herzegovina
A v. Bosnia and Herzegovina CAT/C/67/D/854/2017 Communication number s : 854/2017 Author: A represented by counsel Philip Grant of TRIAL International Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 67 Country Bosnia and Herzegovina Submission date 01 Nov JUTBCAT/C/67/D/854/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2623/en-US
A. v. Canada
A. v. Canada CAT/C/57/D/583/2014 Communication number s : 583/2014 Author: A. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 57 Country Canada Submission date 16 Dec 2014 Date of decision 09 May 2016 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCAT/C/57/D/583/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2115/en-US
A v. Russian Federation
A v. Russian Federation CEDAW/C/81/D/137/2018 Communication number s : 137/2018 Author: A Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 81 Country Russian Federation Submission date 21 Sep 2018 Date of decision 23 Feb 2022 Comment: This document JUTBCEDAW/C/81/D/137/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3051/en-US
ABU ZUBAYDAH v. Lithuania
ABU ZUBAYDAH v. Lithuania LTU 08/10/2018 00:00:00 03/12/2018 15:46:42 Case Description: The case concerns violations of a number of Convention rights on account of the fact that the applicant was the victim of an extraordinary rendition operation. The EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50865
ADOPTED CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS: CZECH REPUBLIC
ADOPTED CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS: CZECH REPUBLIC CEDAW/C/CZE/CO/6 NULL 2016 03 10T00:00:00 CEDAW United Nations CEDAW/C/CZE/CO/6 Convention on the Elimination Distr.: General of All Forms of Discrimination 14 March 2016 against Women Original: English UHRICEDAW/C/CZE/CO/6https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/df44459f-375a-4034-b0d5-fafc9b172d4d
AL NASHIRI v. Poland
AL NASHIRI v. Poland POL 16/02/2015 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: The cases concern the violation of a number of Convention rights arising from the fact that the applicants were victims of a secret rendition operation involving their EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20624