Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 4401 - 4420 of 5593
LIMAN-IS SENDIKASI (NO 1) v. Turkey
LIMAN IS SENDIKASI NO 1 v. Turkey TUR 11/04/2011 00:00:00 09/02/2018 16:41:55 Case Description: The case of Liman Is 29608/05 concerns a violation of the right to a fair trial on account of the failure of the national authorities to enforce final EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37182
LITHUANIA: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
LITHUANIA: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CRC/C/LTU/CO/3 4 NULL 2013 10 29T00:00:00 CRC United Nations CRC/C/LTU/CO/3 4 Convention on the Distr.: General 30 October 2013 Rights of the Child Original: English Committee on the Rights of the Child Concluding UHRICRC/C/LTU/CO/3-4https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/3ddc0175-944b-4a8f-840a-242b0342074c
LOIRY v. Romania
LOIRY v. Romania ROU 17/05/2022 00:00:00 20/05/2022 13:17:17 Case Description: This case concerns a violation of the applicant s right to respect for his family life on account of the authorities failure to enforce a final court decision of 9 August 2018 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-60331
LULI v. Albania
LULI v. Albania ALB 15/09/2015 00:00:00 24/10/2016 16:48:47 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the structural problem of the authorities failure to enforce final domestic decisions relating to the right to restitution or compensation for EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-255
LUXEMBOURG: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
LUXEMBOURG: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS E/C.12/LUX/CO/4 NULL 2022 11 14T00:00:00 CESCR United Nations E/C.12/LUX/CO/4 Economic and Social Council Distr.: General 15 November 2022 English Original: French Committee on Economic Social and Cultural Rights UHRIE/C.12/LUX/CO/4https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/f37f8eef-ff32-4259-8bf2-1a3a02827613
Laing v. Australia
Laing v. Australia CCPR/C/81/D/901/1999 Communication number s : 901/1999 Author: Deborah Joy Laing Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 81 Country Australia Submission date 30 Nov 1999 Date of decision 09 Jul 2004 Comment: Two individual JUTBCCPR/C/81/D/901/1999https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1091/en-US
Lichtensztejn v. Uruguay
Lichtensztejn v. Uruguay CCPR/C/18/D/77/1980 Communication number s : 077/1980 Author: Samuel Lichtensztejn Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 18 Country Uruguay Submission date 30 Sep 1980 Date of decision 31 Mar 1983 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/18/D/77/1980https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/315/en-US
Linton v. Jamaica
Linton v. Jamaica CCPR/C/46/D/255/1987 Communication number s : 255/1987 Author: Carlton Linton Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 46 Country Jamaica Submission date 11 Oct 1987 Date of decision 22 Oct 1992 Comment: on 12 November 1987 and on JUTBCCPR/C/46/D/255/1987https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/382/en-US
Lourdes da Silva Pimentel v. Brazil
Lourdes da Silva Pimentel v. Brazil CEDAW/C/49/D/17/2008 Communication number s : 017/2008 Author: Maria de Lourdes da Silva Pimentel Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 49 Country Brazil Submission date 30 Nov 2007 Date of decision 25 Jul JUTBCEDAW/C/49/D/17/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1701/en-US
Luciano Daniel Juárez v. Argentina
Luciano Daniel Ju rez v. Argentina E/C.12/68/D/149/2019 Communication number s : 149/2019 Author: Luciano Daniel Ju rez Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 68 Virtual Session Country Argentina Submission date 01 Feb 2018 Date of decision JUTBE/C.12/68/D/149/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2770/en-US
M.A.K. v. Germany
M.A.K. v. Germany CAT/C/32/D/214/2002 Communication number s : 214/2002 Author: M.A.K. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 32 Country Germany Submission date 10 Sep 2002 Date of decision 05 May 2004 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/32/D/214/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/155/en-US
M'Barek v. Tunisia
M Barek v. Tunisia CAT/C/23/D/60/1996 Communication number s : 060/1996 Author: Khaled M Barek Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 23 Country Tunisia Submission date 06 Nov 1996 Date of decision 10 Nov 1999 Comment: See also Communication No. JUTBCAT/C/23/D/60/1996https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/219/en-US
M.C.M.V.F. v. Sweden
M.C.M.V.F. v. Sweden CAT/C/35/D/237/2003 Communication number s : 237/2003 Author: M.C.M.V.F. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 35 Country Sweden Submission date 07 Aug 2003 Date of decision 14 Nov 2005 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/35/D/237/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/129/en-US
M.I.A.P. v. Spain
M.I.A.P. v. Spain CCPR/C/131/D/2558/2015 Communication number s : 2558/2015 Author: M.I.A.P. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 131 Country Spain Submission date 18 Dec 2014 Date of decision 15 Mar 2021 Comment: Individual opinion of JUTBCCPR/C/131/D/2558/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3488/en-US
M.K.M. v. Denmark
M.K.M. v. Denmark CEDAW/C/71/D/81/2015 Communication number s : 081/2015 Author: M.K.M. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 71 Country Denmark Submission date Date of decision 29 Oct 2018 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/71/D/81/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2457/en-US
M.R. AND D.R. v. Ukraine
M.R. AND D.R. v. Ukraine UKR 22/08/2018 00:00:00 05/09/2018 11:48:13 Case Description: The present cases concern the implementation of the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction the Hague Convention in Ukraine and in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50167
M.T. v. Uzbekistan
M.T. v. Uzbekistan CCPR/C/114/D/2234/2013 Communication number s : 2234/2013 Author: M.T. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 114 Country Uzbekistan Submission date 18 Dec 2012 Date of decision 23 Jul 2015 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/114/D/2234/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2015/en-US
M.Z. v. Kazakhstan
M.Z. v. Kazakhstan CCPR/C/119/D/2145/2012 Communication number s : 2145/2012 Author: M.Z. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 119 Country Kazakhstan Submission date 28 Mar 2011 Date of decision 28 Mar 2017 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/119/D/2145/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2260/en-US
MAIRE v. Portugal
MAIRE v. Portugal PRT 26/09/2003 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:02:55 Case Description: Protection of family life: Unlawful interference due to the authorities failure to enforce judicial decisions relating to the exercise by the applicant of custody of his child EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-9963
MAKUCHYAN AND MINASYAN v. Azerbaijan
MAKUCHYAN AND MINASYAN v. Azerbaijan AZE 12/10/2020 00:00:00 04/11/2020 15:26:31 Case Description: The case concerns Azerbaijan s unjustified failure to continue to enforce a prison sentence on one of its military officers for an ethnic hate crime EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56213