Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 36
Alzery v. Sweden
Alzery v. Sweden CCPR/C/88/D/1416/2005 Communication number s : 1416/2005 Author: Mohammed Alzery Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 88 Country Sweden Submission date 29 Jul 2005 Date of decision 25 Oct 2006 Comment: Pursuant to rule 90 of JUTBCCPR/C/88/D/1416/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1300/en-US
CASE OF CARSON AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF CARSON AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 42184/05 OTTY T. OLBOURNE B. TUNLEY M. P. GRAY H. GBR 3/16/2010 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed non exhaustion of domestic remedies Preliminary objection allowed non exhaustion of domestic ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0316JUD004218405https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-97704
CASE OF CARSON AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF CARSON AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 42184/05 OTTY T. OLBOURNE B. GBR 11/4/2008 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible No violation of Art. 14 P1 1 238 343 100 258 369 311 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1104JUD004218405 FOURTH SECTION CASE OF CARSON AND OTHERS ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1104JUD004218405https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-89309
CASE OF GEORGIA v. RUSSIA (II)
CASE OF GEORGIA v. RUSSIA II 38263/08 RUS 1/21/2021 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objections dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Ratione loci ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0121JUD003826308https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-207757
CASE OF PELLADOAH v. THE NETHERLANDS
CASE OF PELLADOAH v. THE NETHERLANDS 16737/90 N/A NLD 9/22/1994 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 6 1 6 3 c Not necessary to examine Art. 6 2 Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Code of Criminal Procedure Articles 270 339 348 399 403 500h 445 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:0922JUD001673790https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57902
CASE OF SUKHOVETSKYY v. UKRAINE
CASE OF SUKHOVETSKYY v. UKRAINE 13716/02 N/A UKR 3/28/2006 12:00:00 AM No violation of P1 3 Not necessary to examine under Art. 14 P1 3 Article 43 of the Law on Parliamentary Elections 2001 Article 24 of the Constitution 343 100 353 574 476 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0328JUD001371602https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-72893
CASE OF T. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF T. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 24724/94 N/A GBR 12/16/1999 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Article 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Degrading treatment Inhuman treatment ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:1216JUD002472494https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58593
CASE OF V. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF V. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 24888/94 N/A GBR 12/16/1999 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Article 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Degrading treatment Inhuman treatment ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:1216JUD002488894https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58594
CASE OF VALIULIENĖ v. LITHUANIA
CASE OF VALIULIEN v. LITHUANIA 33234/07 MICKEVICIUS H. LTU 3/26/2013 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Positive obligations Substantive aspect Non pecuniary damage award Article 116 of the old Criminal Code Article 140 1 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0326JUD003323407https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-117636
CASE OF VINTER AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF VINTER AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 66069/09 130/10 3896/10 CREIGHTON S. WEATHERBY P. VAN ZYL SMIT D. WOODS B. HORWELL R. HINDMARSH L. CHIVERS SOLICITORS BINGLEY McKONE M. GBR 7/9/2013 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0709JUD006606909https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-122664
CASE OF VINTER AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF VINTER AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 66069/09 130/10 3896/10 CREIGHTON S. WOODS B. Chivers Solicitors GBR 1/17/2012 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Degrading punishment Inhuman ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0117JUD006606909https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-108610
CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS OF THE COMMITTEE ON THE ELIMINATION OF DISCRIMINATION AGAINST WOMEN : MAURITIUS
CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS OF THE COMMITTEE ON THE ELIMINATION OF DISCRIMINATION AGAINST WOMEN : MAURITIUS CEDAW/C/MUS/CO/6 7 NULL 2011 11 08T00:00:00 CEDAW United Nations CEDAW/C/MUS/CO/6 7 Convention on the Elimination Distr.: General of All Forms of UHRICEDAW/C/MUS/CO/6-7https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/96525c4f-c8cf-477b-9207-3925d9f7c844
CONSIDERATION OF REPORTS SUBMITTED BY STATES PARTIES UNDER ARTICLES 16 AND 17 OF THE COVENANT : CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS OF THE COMMITTEE ON ECONOMIC, SOCIAL AND CULTURAL RIGHTS : MAURITIUS
CONSIDERATION OF REPORTS SUBMITTED BY STATES PARTIES UNDER ARTICLES 16 AND 17 OF THE COVENANT : CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS OF THE COMMITTEE ON ECONOMIC SOCIAL AND CULTURAL RIGHTS : MAURITIUS E/C.12/MUS/CO/4 NULL 2010 06 08T00:00:00 CESCR United Nations UHRIE/C.12/MUS/CO/4https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/33aad05f-4e07-4012-bbfa-8654f6a6b23f
Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (ETS No. 005)
Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms ETS No. 005 005 Rome 1950 11 04T00:00:00 Treaty open for signature by the member States of the Council of Europe and for accession by the European Union Rome 1953 09 03T00:00:00 10 COEETS No. 005https://rm.coe.int/1680a2353d
Dumont v. Canada
Dumont v. Canada CCPR/C/98/D/1467/2006 Communication number s : 1467/2006 Author: Michel Dumont Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 98 Country Canada Submission date 17 Mar 2006 Date of decision 16 Mar 2010 Comment: The text of an individual JUTBCCPR/C/98/D/1467/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1582/en-US
Hamida v. Canada
Hamida v. Canada CCPR/C/98/D/1544/2007 Communication number s : 1544/2007 Author: Mehrez Ben Abde Hamida Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 98 Country Canada Submission date 22 Jan 2007 Date of decision 18 Mar 2010 Comment: Pursuant to rule JUTBCCPR/C/98/D/1544/2007https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1562/en-US
Hertzberg et al. v. Finland
Hertzberg et al. v. Finland CCPR/C/15/D/61/1979 Communication number s : 061/1979 Author: Leo R. Hertzberg Ulf Mansson Astrid Nikula and Marko Tuovi Putkonen Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 15 Country Finland Submission date 07 Aug 1979 JUTBCCPR/C/15/D/61/1979https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/337/en-US
Kibale v. Canada
Kibale v. Canada CCPR/C/93/D/1562/2007 Communication number s : 1562/2007 Author: Guillaume Kibale Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 93 Country Canada Submission date 23 Aug 2005 Date of decision 22 Jul 2008 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/93/D/1562/2007https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1480/en-US
Love et al. v. Australia
Love et al. v. Australia CCPR/C/77/D/983/2001 Communication number s : 983/2001 Author: John K. Love William L. Bone William J. Craig and Peter B. Ivanoff Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 77 Country Australia Submission date 01 Aug 1997 JUTBCCPR/C/77/D/983/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1044/en-US
McIvor and Grismer v. Canada
McIvor and Grismer v. Canada CCPR/C/124/D/2020/2010 Communication number s : 2020/2010 Author: Sharon McIvor and Jacob Grismer Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 124 Country Canada Submission date 24 Nov 2010 Date of decision 01 Nov 2018 JUTBCCPR/C/124/D/2020/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3081/en-US