Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 101 - 120 of 15665
A.S. v. Denmark
A.S. v. Denmark CRC/C/82/D/36/2017 Communication number s : 036/2017 Author: A.S. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 82 Country Denmark Submission date 18 Oct 2017 Date of decision 26 Sep 2019 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCRC/C/82/D/36/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2599/en-US
A.S. v. Nepal
A.S. v. Nepal CCPR/C/115/D/2077/2011 Communication number s : 2077/2011 Author: A.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 115 Country Nepal Submission date 22 Jul 2011 Date of decision 06 Nov 2015 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/115/D/2077/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2045/en-US
A. S. v. Russian Federation
A. S. v. Russian Federation CERD/C/79/D/45/2009 Communication number s : 045/2009 Author: A. S. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 79 Country Russian Federation Submission date 20 Aug 2009 Date of decision 26 Aug 2011 Comment: This JUTBCERD/C/79/D/45/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1726/en-US
A.S. v. Sweden
A.S. v. Sweden CAT/C/74/D/949/2019 Communication number s : 949/2019 Author: A.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 74 Country Sweden Submission date 26 Jul 2019 Date of decision 27 Jul 2022 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCAT/C/74/D/949/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3611/en-US
A.S. v. Sweden
A.S. v. Sweden CAT/C/25/D/149/1999 Communication number s : 149/1999 Author: A.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 25 Country Sweden Submission date 06 Nov 1999 Date of decision 24 Nov 2000 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCAT/C/25/D/149/1999https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/206/en-US
A.W.K. v. New Zealand
A.W.K. v. New Zealand CCPR/C/112/D/1998/2010 Communication number s : 1998/2010 Author: A.W.K. represented by counsel Frank Deliu Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 112 Country New Zealand Submission date 02 Aug 2010 Date of decision 28 JUTBCCPR/C/112/D/1998/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1896/en-US
A.W.R.A.P. v. Denmark
A.W.R.A.P. v. Denmark CERD/C/71/D/37/2006 Communication number s : 037/2006 Author: A.W.R.A.P. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 71 Country Denmark Submission date 06 Jul 2006 Date of decision 08 Aug 2007 Comment: This document has no JUTBCERD/C/71/D/37/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1735/en-US
A.Y.O.AQ v. Italy
A.Y.O.AQ v. Italy CCPR/C/134/D/3587/2019 Communication number s : 3587/2019 Author: A.Y.O.AQ Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 134 Country Italy Submission date 02 May 2018 Date of decision 25 Mar 2022 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/134/D/3587/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3145/en-US
Aïcha Dehimi and Noura Ayache v. Algeria
A cha Dehimi and Noura Ayache v. Algeria CCPR/C/112/D/2086/2011 Communication number s : 2086/2011 Author: A cha Dehimi and Noura Ayache represented by Philippe Grant of Track Impunity Always TRIAL a Swiss association against impunity Type of decision: JUTBCCPR/C/112/D/2086/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1911/en-US
Aïcha Habouchi v. Algeria
A cha Habouchi v. Algeria CCPR/C/128/D/2819/2016 Communication number s : 2819/2016 Author: A cha Habouchi Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 128 Country Algeria Submission date 07 Apr 2016 Date of decision 27 Mar 2020 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/128/D/2819/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2871/en-US
A decency threshold for prisons – criteria for assessing conditions of detention
A decency threshold for prisons criteria for assessing conditions of detention fcn fk fkm fkmh fkmv fkrg fmpm ftb 2021 05 06 2018 04 19 European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment CPT CPT/Inf 2021 5 CPTCPT/Inf(2021)5-parthttps://hudoc.cpt.coe.int/eng?i=p-standards-inf-2021-5-part-en
Açikkollu v. Türkiye
A ikkollu v. T rkiye CCPR/C/136/D/3730/2020 Communication number s : 3730/2020 Author: M m ne A ikkollu Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 136 Country T rkiye Submission date 29 Jan 2020 Date of decision 25 Oct 2022 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/136/D/3730/2020https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3761/en-US
A v. Bosnia and Herzegovina
A v. Bosnia and Herzegovina CAT/C/67/D/854/2017 Communication number s : 854/2017 Author: A represented by counsel Philip Grant of TRIAL International Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 67 Country Bosnia and Herzegovina Submission date 01 Nov JUTBCAT/C/67/D/854/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2623/en-US
A. v. Denmark
A. v. Denmark CEDAW/C/62/D/53/2013 Communication number s : 53/2013 Author: A. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 62 Country Denmark Submission date 11 Apr 2013 Date of decision 19 Nov 2015 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCEDAW/C/62/D/53/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3027/en-US
A v. Netherlands
A v. Netherlands CAT/C/21/D/91/1997 Communication number s : 091/1997 Author: A Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 21 Country Netherlands Submission date 23 Oct 1997 Date of decision 13 Nov 1998 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/21/D/91/1997https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/239/en-US
A v. New Zealand
A v. New Zealand CCPR/C/66/D/754/1997 Communication number s : 754/1997 Author: A Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 66 Country New Zealand Submission date 19 Apr 1996 Date of decision 15 Jul 1999 Comment: Individual opinion submitted by JUTBCCPR/C/66/D/754/1997https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/802/en-US
ABU ZUBAYDAH v. Lithuania
ABU ZUBAYDAH v. Lithuania LTU 08/10/2018 00:00:00 03/12/2018 15:46:42 Case Description: The case concerns violations of a number of Convention rights on account of the fact that the applicant was the victim of an extraordinary rendition operation. The EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50865
ABUSHOV v. Azerbaijan
ABUSHOV v. Azerbaijan AZE 27/02/2020 00:00:00 20/03/2020 16:31:03 Case Description: These cases concern violations of the applicants right to family life violation of Article 8 in 2010 2011. In Abushov the Court established the domestic courts failure to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54937
ADDENDUM TO THE SECOND COMPLIANCE REPORT ON ICELAND
ADDENDUM TO THE SECOND COMPLIANCE REPORT ON ICELAND ISL 2019 06 21 2019 06 26 I. INTRODUCTION The Addendum to the Second Compliance Report assesses the measures taken by the authorities of Iceland to implement the pending recommendations issued in the GRECOGrecoRC4(2019)16-Final-eng-Iceland-Add2ndRC-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=GrecoRC4(2019)16-Final-eng-Iceland-Add2ndRC-PUBLIC
AFANASYEV v. Ukraine
AFANASYEV v. Ukraine UKR 05/07/2005 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: These cases concern physical or psychological torture and/or ill treatment by the police mostly in order to obtain confessions substantive violations of Article 3 lack of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31348