Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 1789
A/HRC/47/10: Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review - Nepal
United Nations A/HRC/47/10 General Assembly Distr.: General 30 March 2021 Original: English Human Rights Council Forty seventh session 21 June 9 July 2021 Agenda item 6 Universal periodic review Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review UPRA/HRC/47/10https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/country-reports/ahrc4710-report-working-group-universal-periodic-review-nepal
A v. Bosnia and Herzegovina
A v. Bosnia and Herzegovina CAT/C/67/D/854/2017 Communication number s : 854/2017 Author: A represented by counsel Philip Grant of TRIAL International Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 67 Country Bosnia and Herzegovina Submission date 01 Nov JUTBCAT/C/67/D/854/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2623/en-US
ABU ZUBAYDAH v. Lithuania
ABU ZUBAYDAH v. Lithuania LTU 08/10/2018 00:00:00 03/12/2018 15:46:42 Case Description: The case concerns violations of a number of Convention rights on account of the fact that the applicant was the victim of an extraordinary rendition operation. The EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50865
AL NASHIRI v. Poland
AL NASHIRI v. Poland POL 16/02/2015 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: The cases concern the violation of a number of Convention rights arising from the fact that the applicants were victims of a secret rendition operation involving their EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20624
AL NASHIRI v. Romania
AL NASHIRI v. Romania ROU 08/10/2018 00:00:00 10/12/2018 09:38:46 Case Description: The case concerns violations of a number of Convention rights arising from the fact that the applicant was the victim of an extraordinary rendition operation. The European EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50873
ANUSCA v. the Republic of Moldova
ANUSCA v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 18/08/2010 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:38:31 Case Description: Right to life: Lack of effective investigations into the applicants sons deaths during their military service mainly on account of insufficient involvement of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7081
Additional Protocol to the Convention for the Protection of Individuals with regard to Automatic Processing of Personal Data, regarding supervisory authorities and transborder data flows (ETS No. 181)
Additional Protocol to the Convention for the Protection of Individuals with regard to Automatic Processing of Personal Data regarding supervisory authorities and transborder data flows ETS No. 181 181 Strasbourg 2001 11 08T00:00:00 Treaty open for COEETS No. 181https://rm.coe.int/1680080626
Additional Protocol to the European Convention on Extradition (ETS No. 086)
Additional Protocol to the European Convention on Extradition ETS No. 086 086 Strasbourg 1975 10 15T00:00:00 Treaty open for signature by the member States signatories to Treaty ETS 24 and for accession by the non member States which have acceded to COEETS No. 086https://rm.coe.int/1680076da5
Additional Protocol to the European Convention on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters (ETS No. 099)
Additional Protocol to the European Convention on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters ETS No. 099 099 Strasbourg 1978 03 17T00:00:00 Treaty open for signature by the member States signatories to Treaty ETS 30 and for accession by the non member States COEETS No. 099https://rm.coe.int/1680077975
Alberto Velásquez Echeverri v. Colombia
Alberto Vel squez Echeverri v. Colombia CCPR/C/129/D/2931/2017 Communication number s : 2931/2017 Author: Alberto Vel squez Echeverri Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 129 Country Colombia Submission date 01 Aug 2016 Date of decision 21 Jul JUTBCCPR/C/129/D/2931/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2863/en-US
Alonzo et al. v. Philippines
Alonzo et al. v. Philippines CEDAW/C/84/D/155/2020 Communication number s : 155/2020 Author: Natalia M. Alonzo Perla B. Balingit Virginia M. Bangit Francia A. Buco Dela Paz B. Culala Belen Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 84 Country JUTBCEDAW/C/84/D/155/2020https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3765/en-US
Atasoy and Sarkut v. Türkiye
Atasoy and Sarkut v. T rkiye CCPR/C/104/D/1853 1854/2008 Communication number s : 1853/2008 1854/2008 Author: Cenk Atasoy and Arda Sarkut Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 104 Country T rkiye Submission date 08 Dec 2008 Date of decision 29 JUTBCCPR/C/104/D/1853-1854/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1627/en-US
Aung v. Canada
Aung v. Canada CAT/C/36/D/273/2005 Communication number s : 273/2005 Author: Thu Aung Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 36 Country Canada Submission date 13 Jul 2005 Date of decision 15 May 2006 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/36/D/273/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/117/en-US
Avadanov v. Azerbaijan
Avadanov v. Azerbaijan CCPR/C/100/D/1633/2007 Communication number s : 1633/2007 Author: Khilal Avadanov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 100 Country Azerbaijan Submission date 31 Jul 2007 Date of decision 25 Oct 2010 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/100/D/1633/2007https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1591/en-US
B.A.E.W. and E.M.W. v. Sweden
B.A.E.W. and E.M.W. v. Sweden CCPR/C/129/D/2744/2016 Communication number s : 2744/2016 Author: B.A.E.W. and E.M.W. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 129 Country Sweden Submission date 26 Feb 2016 Date of decision 23 Jul 2020 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/129/D/2744/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2847/en-US
BORZHONOV v. Russia
BORZHONOV v. Russia RUS 22/04/2009 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This group of cases mainly concerns the authorities failure to respect the applicants right to peaceful enjoyment of possessions due to the retention of their property EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13819
Baumgarten v. Germany
Baumgarten v. Germany CCPR/C/78/D/960/2000 Communication number s : 960/2000 Author: Klaus Dieter Baumgarten Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 78 Country Germany Submission date 30 Sep 1998 Date of decision 31 Jul 2003 Comment: The Covenant JUTBCCPR/C/78/D/960/2000https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1061/en-US
Ben Salem v. Tunisia
Ben Salem v. Tunisia CAT/C/39/D/269/2005 Communication number s : 269/2005 Author: Ali Ben Salem Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 39 Country Tunisia Submission date 02 May 2005 Date of decision 07 Nov 2007 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/39/D/269/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/87/en-US
CASE OF A AND B v. CROATIA
CASE OF A AND B v. CROATIA 7144/15 BOJIC I. VRANJICAN DEREK T. DRENSKI LASAN V. HRV 6/20/2019 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Effective investigation Procedural aspect No violation of Article 8 Right to respect for ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0620JUD000714415https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-194217
CASE OF A AND B v. NORWAY
CASE OF A AND B v. NORWAY 24130/11 29758/11 KJELDAHL R. NOR 11/15/2016 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 Right not to be tried or punished twice general Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 Right not to be tried or punished twice Criminal ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1115JUD002413011https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-168972