Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 54
A/HRC/47/10: Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review - Nepal
United Nations A/HRC/47/10 General Assembly Distr.: General 30 March 2021 Original: English Human Rights Council Forty seventh session 21 June 9 July 2021 Agenda item 6 Universal periodic review Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review UPRA/HRC/47/10https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/country-reports/ahrc4710-report-working-group-universal-periodic-review-nepal
A/HRC/47/9: Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review - Saint Lucia
United Nations A/HRC/47/9 General Assembly Distr.: General 14 April 2021 Original: English Human Rights Council Forty seventh session 21 June 9 July 2021 Agenda item 6 Universal periodic review Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review UPRA/HRC/47/9https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/country-reports/ahrc479-report-working-group-universal-periodic-review-saint-lucia
Additional Protocol to the Convention for the Protection of Individuals with regard to Automatic Processing of Personal Data, regarding supervisory authorities and transborder data flows (ETS No. 181)
Additional Protocol to the Convention for the Protection of Individuals with regard to Automatic Processing of Personal Data regarding supervisory authorities and transborder data flows ETS No. 181 181 Strasbourg 2001 11 08T00:00:00 Treaty open for COEETS No. 181https://rm.coe.int/1680080626
CASE OF GEORGIA v. RUSSIA (II)
CASE OF GEORGIA v. RUSSIA II 38263/08 RUS 1/21/2021 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objections dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Ratione loci ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0121JUD003826308https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-207757
CASE OF PELLADOAH v. THE NETHERLANDS
CASE OF PELLADOAH v. THE NETHERLANDS 16737/90 N/A NLD 9/22/1994 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 6 1 6 3 c Not necessary to examine Art. 6 2 Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Code of Criminal Procedure Articles 270 339 348 399 403 500h 445 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:0922JUD001673790https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57902
CASE OF T. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF T. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 24724/94 N/A GBR 12/16/1999 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Article 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Degrading treatment Inhuman treatment ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:1216JUD002472494https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58593
CASE OF V. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF V. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 24888/94 N/A GBR 12/16/1999 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Article 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Degrading treatment Inhuman treatment ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:1216JUD002488894https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58594
CASE OF VALIULIENĖ v. LITHUANIA
CASE OF VALIULIEN v. LITHUANIA 33234/07 MICKEVICIUS H. LTU 3/26/2013 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Positive obligations Substantive aspect Non pecuniary damage award Article 116 of the old Criminal Code Article 140 1 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0326JUD003323407https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-117636
CASE OF VINTER AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF VINTER AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 66069/09 130/10 3896/10 CREIGHTON S. WOODS B. Chivers Solicitors GBR 1/17/2012 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Degrading punishment Inhuman ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0117JUD006606909https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-108610
CONSIDERATION OF REPORTS SUBMITTED BY STATES PARTIES UNDER ARTICLES 16 AND 17 OF THE COVENANT : CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS OF THE COMMITTEE ON ECONOMIC, SOCIAL AND CULTURAL RIGHTS : MAURITIUS
CONSIDERATION OF REPORTS SUBMITTED BY STATES PARTIES UNDER ARTICLES 16 AND 17 OF THE COVENANT : CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS OF THE COMMITTEE ON ECONOMIC SOCIAL AND CULTURAL RIGHTS : MAURITIUS E/C.12/MUS/CO/4 NULL 2010 06 08T00:00:00 CESCR United Nations UHRIE/C.12/MUS/CO/4https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/33aad05f-4e07-4012-bbfa-8654f6a6b23f
Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (ETS No. 005)
Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms ETS No. 005 005 Rome 1950 11 04T00:00:00 Treaty open for signature by the member States of the Council of Europe and for accession by the European Union Rome 1953 09 03T00:00:00 10 COEETS No. 005https://rm.coe.int/1680a2353d
Convention on Mutual Administrative Assistance in Tax Matters (ETS No. 127)
Convention on Mutual Administrative Assistance in Tax Matters ETS No. 127 127 Strasbourg 1988 01 25T00:00:00 Treaty open for signature by the member States of the Council of Europe and the Member countries of OECD and in its version amended by the 2010 COEETS No. 127https://rm.coe.int/16806a42b0
D.S. v. Russian Federation
D.S. v. Russian Federation CCPR/C/120/D/2705/2015 Communication number s : 2705/2015 Author: D.S. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 120 Country Russian Federation Submission date 17 Sep 2015 Date of decision 14 Jul 2017 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/120/D/2705/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2326/en-US
Fillacier v. France
Fillacier v. France CCPR/C/86/D/1434/2005 Communication number s : 1434/2005 Author: Claude Fillacier Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 86 Country France Submission date 24 May 2004 Date of decision 27 Mar 2006 Comment: Pursuant to JUTBCCPR/C/86/D/1434/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1216/en-US
Gratzinger v. Czech Republic
Gratzinger v. Czech Republic CCPR/C/91/D/1463/2006 Communication number s : 1463/2006 Author: Peter and Eva Gratzinger Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 91 Country Czech Republic Submission date 12 Feb 2006 Date of decision 25 Oct 2007 JUTBCCPR/C/91/D/1463/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1383/en-US
Hussain v. Mauritius
Hussain v. Mauritius CCPR/C/77/D/980/2001 Communication number s : 980/2001 Author: Fazal Hussain Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 77 Country Mauritius Submission date 18 Feb 1998 Date of decision 18 Mar 2003 Comment: Pursuant to rule JUTBCCPR/C/77/D/980/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1043/en-US
Klain and Klain v. Czech Republic
Klain and Klain v. Czech Republic CCPR/C/103/D/1847/2008 Communication number s : 1847/2008 Author: Miroslav Klain and Eva Klain Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 103 Country Czech Republic Submission date 16 Mar 2006 Date of decision 01 Nov JUTBCCPR/C/103/D/1847/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1228/en-US
Lnenicka v. Czech Republic
Lnenicka v. Czech Republic CCPR/C/92/D/1484/2006 Communication number s : 1484/2006 Author: Josef Lnenicka Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 92 Country Czech Republic Submission date 09 Feb 2006 Date of decision 25 Mar 2008 Comment: The text JUTBCCPR/C/92/D/1484/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1409/en-US
M.T. v. Uzbekistan
M.T. v. Uzbekistan CCPR/C/114/D/2234/2013 Communication number s : 2234/2013 Author: M.T. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 114 Country Uzbekistan Submission date 18 Dec 2012 Date of decision 23 Jul 2015 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/114/D/2234/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2015/en-US
O.K. v. Latvia
O.K. v. Latvia CCPR/C/110/D/1935/2010 Communication number s : 1935/2010 Author: O.K. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 110 Country Latvia Submission date 13 Nov 2009 Date of decision 19 Mar 2014 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/110/D/1935/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1810/en-US