Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 881 - 900 of 1331
MUSHEGH SAGHATELYAN v. Armenia
MUSHEGH SAGHATELYAN v. Armenia ARM 20/12/2018 00:00:00 16/01/2019 17:03:19 Case Description: In the present cases the Court found various violations of Articles 3 5 6 11 and 13 of the Convention in the context of the dispersal by the authorities of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-51167
Milan Mandić v. Bosnia and Herzegovina
Milan Mandi v. Bosnia and Herzegovina CCPR/C/115/D/2064/2011 Communication number s : 2064/2011 Author: Milan Mandi Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 115 Country Bosnia and Herzegovina Submission date 15 Apr 2011 Date of decision 05 Nov 2015 JUTBCCPR/C/115/D/2064/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2063/en-US
Mukhlisov v. Kazakhstan
Mukhlisov v. Kazakhstan CCPR/C/130/D/2457/2014 Communication number s : 2457/2014 Author: Modan Mukhlisov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 130 Country Kazakhstan Submission date 26 Oct 2013 Date of decision 30 Oct 2020 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/130/D/2457/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3492/en-US
NAKU v. Lithuania
NAKU v. Lithuania LTU 08/02/2017 00:00:00 09/03/2017 11:52:36 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Disproportionate restriction of access to court due to the domestic courts dismissal of the applicant s claim in an employment EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46083
NASTESKA v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia
NASTESKA v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia MKD 27/08/2010 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:31:05 Case Description: Functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings due to the infringement of the principle of equality of arms by summoning only the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6496
NATALIYA MIKHAYLENKO v. Ukraine
NATALIYA MIKHAYLENKO v. Ukraine UKR 30/08/2013 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of access to a court due to the applicant s inability to have her legal incapacity reviewed and restored EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-32289
NAVOLOACA v. the Republic of Moldova
NAVOLOACA v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 16/03/2009 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:38:31 Case Description: Functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings on account of the quashing of the applicant s acquittal and his conviction by the Supreme Court of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6764
NEDIM SENER v. Turkey
NEDIM SENER v. Turkey TUR 08/10/2014 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:04:14 Case Description: These groups mainly concern unjustified and disproportionate interferences with the applicants freedom of expression on account of criminal proceedings for having EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37296
NIGER : CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
NIGER : CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CCPR/C/NER/CO/2 NULL 2019 05 15T00:00:00 CCPR United Nations CCPR/C/NER/CO/2 International Covenant on Distr.: General 16 May 2019 Civil and Political Rights English Original: French Human Rights Committee Concluding UHRICCPR/C/NER/CO/2https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/f95a761f-247f-4610-a506-b8dff61761c8
Narymbaev v. Kazakhstan
Narymbaev v. Kazakhstan CCPR/C/130/D/2521/2015 Communication number s : 2521/2015 Author: Ermek Narymbaev Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 130 Country Kazakhstan Submission date 02 Sep 2014 Date of decision 06 Nov 2020 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/130/D/2521/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3267/en-US
Nurlanuly v. Kazakhstan
Nurlanuly v. Kazakhstan CCPR/C/130/D/2546/2015 Communication number s : 2546/2015 Author: Damir Nurlanuly Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 130 Country Kazakhstan Submission date 02 Sep 2014 Date of decision 06 Nov 2020 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/130/D/2546/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3255/en-US
ONER AND TURK v. Turkey
ONER AND TURK v. Turkey TUR 30/06/2015 00:00:00 10/11/2016 11:41:27 Case Description: These groups mainly concern unjustified and disproportionate interferences with the applicants freedom of expression on account of criminal proceedings for having EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-36806
OZMURAT INSAAT ELEKTRIK NAKLIYAT TEMIZLIK SAN. VE TIC. LTD. STI. v. Turkey
OZMURAT INSAAT ELEKTRIK NAKLIYAT TEMIZLIK SAN. VE TIC. LTD. STI. v. Turkey TUR 09/04/2018 00:00:00 28/05/2018 11:38:33 Case Description: Functioning of justice: Domestic courts refusal without any specific reasons of the applicant s request for a hearing EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49543
Opening Statement by Zeid Ra'ad Al Hussein, United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, at an informal briefing to Member States on the Universal Periodic Review Trust Fund
15 September 2015 Excellencies Ladies and Gentlemen It is a pleasure for me to open this side event on The UPR Trust Fund on Implementation of Recommendations: Follow up Support Given at the Country Level which is aimed at highlighting examples of ways in UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/statements/2015/09/opening-statement-zeid-raad-al-hussein-united-nations-high-commissioner-human
Operations of the Voluntary Fund for Financial and Technical Assistance in the Implementation of the Universal Periodic Review - Report of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights
United Nations A/HRC/38/27 General Assembly Distr.: General 26 April 2018 Original: English Human Rights Council Thirty eighth session 18 June 6 July 2018 Agenda items 2 and 6 Annual report of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights and UPRA/HRC/38/27https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/reports/operations-voluntary-fund-financial-and-technical-assistance-implementation-1
Operations of the Voluntary Fund for Financial and Technical Assistance in the Implementation of the Universal Periodic Review - Report of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights
United Nations A/HRC/35/18 General Assembly Distr.: General 13 April 2017 Original: English Human Rights Council Thirty fifth session 6 23 June 2017 Agenda items 2 and 6 Annual report of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights and reports of UPRA/HRC/35/18https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/reports/operations-voluntary-fund-financial-and-technical-assistance-implementation-2
Operations of the Voluntary Fund for Financial and Technical Assistance in the implementation of the universal periodic review - Report of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights
United Nations A/HRC/44/19 General Assembly Distr.: General 20 April 2020 Original: English Human Rights Council Forty fourth session 15 June 3 July 2020 Agenda items 2 and 6 Annual report of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights and UPRA/HRC/44/19https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/reports/operations-voluntary-fund-financial-and-technical-assistance-implementation-0
P. AND S. v. Poland
P. AND S. v. Poland POL 30/01/2013 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: These three cases concern the lack of effective access to lawful abortion in Poland. The Tysi c and R.R. cases concern the lack of effective procedural mechanisms to enable EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20614
PANTELEYENKO v. Ukraine
PANTELEYENKO v. Ukraine UKR 12/02/2007 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: Protection of private and family life / functioning of justice: Disproportionate interference due to irregularities in the conduct of search and seizure in the first EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31088
PANYIK v. Hungary
PANYIK v. Hungary HUN 12/10/2011 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:32:51 Case Description: Functioning of justice: Unfair civil proceedings due to the applicant s legitimate doubt as to the impartiality of the tribunal as the judge in charge of the appeal had EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10975