Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 21 - 40 of 12111
A.P. v. Russian Federation
A.P. v. Russian Federation CCPR/C/107/D/1857/2008 Communication number s : 1857/2008 Author: A.P. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 107 Country Russian Federation Submission date 20 May 2008 Date of decision 28 Mar 2013 Comment: The JUTBCCPR/C/107/D/1857/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1326/en-US
A.S., D.I., O.I. and G.D. v. Italy
A.S. D.I. O.I. and G.D. v. Italy CCPR/C/130/D/3042/2017 Communication number s : 3042/2017 Author: A.S. D.I. O.I. and G.D. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 130 Country Italy Submission date 19 May 2017 Date of decision 04 Nov 2020 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/130/D/3042/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3275/en-US
A.S. et al. v. Malta
A.S. et al. v. Malta CCPR/C/128/D/3043/2017 Communication number s : 3043/2017 Author: A.S. D.I. O.I. and G.D. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 128 Country Malta Submission date 19 May 2017 Date of decision 13 Mar 2020 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/128/D/3043/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3300/en-US
A.S. v. France
A.S. v. France FRA 30/12/1997 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:01:23 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Excessive length of civil proceedings before the Social Chamber of the Cour de cassation. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31922
A.T. v. Russian Federation
A.T. v. Russian Federation CCPR/C/132/D/3049/2017 Communication number s : 3049/2017 Author: A.T. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 132 Country Russian Federation Submission date 20 Apr 2015 Date of decision 23 Jul 2021 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/132/D/3049/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3181/en-US
A and B v. Azerbaijan
A and B v. Azerbaijan CAT/C/74/D/905/2018 Communication number s : 905/2018 Author: A and B Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 74 Country Azerbaijan Submission date 22 Dec 2018 Date of decision 27 Jul 2022 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/74/D/905/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3586/en-US
ABBOUD v. Belgium
ABBOUD v. Belgium BEL 04/11/2019 00:00:00 18/11/2019 16:25:04 Case Description: Group of cases concerning excessive length of criminal proceedings classified under the Bell group. For the notes see under that group link . Belgium EXEC 75729 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54199
ABDOLKHANI AND KARIMNIA v. Turkey
ABDOLKHANI AND KARIMNIA v. Turkey TUR 01/03/2010 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:53:30 Case Description: Right to liberty and security / deportation and extradition protection against ill treatment / conditions of detention: absence of clear legal provisions EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37254
ABDULKADIR DEMIR v. Turkey
ABDULKADIR DEMIR v. Turkey TUR 09/10/2012 00:00:00 09/11/2016 15:45:01 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Non enforcement or delayed enforcement of domestic judicial decisions mostly delivered against entities owned or EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-35375
ABDURRAHMAN TEKIN v. Turkey
ABDURRAHMAN TEKIN v. Turkey TUR 25/09/2018 00:00:00 10/10/2018 10:41:00 Case Description: Freedom of assembly and protection against ill treatment: Disproportionate interference due to the prosecution of participants in peaceful assemblies and use of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50395
ABENAVOLI v. Italy
ABENAVOLI v. Italy ITA 02/09/1997 00:00:00 08/11/2016 09:13:26 Case Description: The Abenavoli group of cases concern the excessive length of proceedings before the administrative courts since the 1990s violations of Article 6 1 . Status of Execution: The EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28186
ABI AND OTHERS v. Turkey
ABI AND OTHERS v. Turkey TUR 13/01/2010 00:00:00 07/11/2016 17:30:19 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Excessive length of detention in police custody and/or the lack of an effective remedy and/or the absence of a right to compensation EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-26896
ABRAMCZYK v. Poland
ABRAMCZYK v. Poland POL 12/09/2007 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:10:55 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and protection of rights in detention: Excessive length of civil and criminal proceedings and lack of an effective remedy in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20363
ABULADZE v. Estonia
ABULADZE v. Estonia EST 24/01/2023 00:00:00 03/02/2023 17:20:59 Case Description: This case concerns the excessive length of the applicant s pre trial detention which lasted approximately four and half years from October 2015 to March 2020 violation of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-62542
ACADEMY TRADING LTD v. Greece
ACADEMY TRADING LTD v. Greece GRC 04/04/2000 00:00:00 07/11/2016 09:36:22 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Excessive length of civil proceedings. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-22158
ACAR v. Turkey
ACAR v. Turkey TUR 30/04/2003 00:00:00 10/11/2016 11:15:36 Case Description: Protection of property: excessive delays in administrative or judicial proceedings to determine compensation and gap of default interest rate in comparison with inflation rate. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-36647
ACCIARDI & CAMPAGNA v. Italy
ACCIARDI CAMPAGNA v. Italy ITA 19/10/2005 00:00:00 08/11/2016 09:13:26 Case Description: The case has been closed. You can access the final resolution via the case documents tab . Status of Execution: Individual measures: proceedings on just satisfaction EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28212
ACHLEITNER v. Austria
ACHLEITNER v. Austria AUT 23/01/2004 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of proceedings on civil rights and obligations and criminal charges before administrative authorities and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-955
ADAM v. Romania
ADAM v. Romania ROU 03/02/2010 00:00:00 06/11/2016 15:17:22 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of access to court due to excessive court fees. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-16923
ADEM YILMAZ DOGAN AND OTHERS v. Turkey
ADEM YILMAZ DOGAN AND OTHERS v. Turkey TUR 15/09/2010 00:00:00 09/11/2016 15:08:40 Case Description: Protection of property and access to and efficient functioning of justice: Disproportionate interference due to cancellation of property titles in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-34895