Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 301 - 320 of 12111
BZDUSEK v. Slovakia
BZDUSEK v. Slovakia SVK 21/09/2005 00:00:00 02/11/2016 13:55:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of civil proceedings. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: Individual EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7865
Bacher v. Austria
Bacher v. Austria CRPD/C/19/D/26/2014 Communication number s : 026/2014 Author: Viktoria Bacher Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 20 Country Austria Submission date 08 Feb 2014 Date of decision 16 Feb 2018 Comment: This document has no JUTBCRPD/C/19/D/26/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2394/en-US
Baumgarten v. Germany
Baumgarten v. Germany CCPR/C/78/D/960/2000 Communication number s : 960/2000 Author: Klaus Dieter Baumgarten Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 78 Country Germany Submission date 30 Sep 1998 Date of decision 31 Jul 2003 Comment: The Covenant JUTBCCPR/C/78/D/960/2000https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1061/en-US
Belenky v. Belarus
Belenky v. Belarus CCPR/C/135/D/2860/2016 Communication number s : 2860/2016 Author: Yury Belenky Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 135 Country Belarus Submission date 05 Feb 2016 Date of decision 08 Jul 2022 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/135/D/2860/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3685/en-US
Ben Ali v. Tunisia
Ben Ali v. Tunisia CCPR/C/115/D/2130/2012 Communication number s : 2130/2012 Author: Zine El Abidine Ben Ali Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 115 Country Tunisia Submission date 19 Jan 2012 Date of decision 02 Nov 2015 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/115/D/2130/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2083/en-US
Benítez Gamarra v. Paraguay
Ben tez Gamarra v. Paraguay CCPR/C/104/D/1829/2008 Communication number s : 1829/2008 Author: Ernesto Ben tez Gamarra Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 104 Country Paraguay Submission date 25 Aug 2008 Date of decision 22 Mar 2012 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/104/D/1829/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1222/en-US
Blaga and Blaga v. Portugal,Romania
Blaga and Blaga v. Portugal Romania CCPR/C/86/D/1158/2003 Communication number s : 1158/2003 Author: Aurel Blaga and Lucia Blaga Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 86 Country Portugal Romania Submission date 16 Jul 2002 Date of decision 30 JUTBCCPR/C/86/D/1158/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1242/en-US
Bochaton v. France
Bochaton v. France CCPR/C/80/D/1084/2002 Communication number s : 1084/2002 Author: Lionel Bochaton Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 80 Country France Submission date 11 Apr 2002 Date of decision 01 Apr 2004 Comment: Under rule 85 of JUTBCCPR/C/80/D/1084/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/381/en-US
Boucherf v. Algeria
Boucherf v. Algeria CCPR/C/86/D/1196/2003 Communication number s : 1196/2003 Author: Fatma Zohra Boucherf Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 86 Country Algeria Submission date 30 Jun 2003 Date of decision 30 Mar 2006 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/86/D/1196/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1256/en-US
Brazil’s human rights record to be reviewed by Universal Periodic Review
GENEVA 2 May 2017 Brazil s human rights record will be examined by the UN Human Rights Council s Universal Periodic Review UPR Working Group for the third time on Friday 5 May 2017 in a meeting that will be webcast live. Brazil is one of the 14 States to UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2017/05/brazils-human-rights-record-be-reviewed-universal-periodic-review
Bronson Blessington and Matthew Elliot v. Australia
Bronson Blessington and Matthew Elliot v. Australia CCPR/C/112/D/1968/2010 Communication number s : 1968/2010 Author: Bronson Blessington and Matthew Elliot represented by Human Rights Law Centre Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 112 Country JUTBCCPR/C/112/D/1968/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1890/en-US
Brough v. Australia
Brough v. Australia CCPR/C/86/D/1184/2003 Communication number s : 1184/2003 Author: Corey Brough Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 86 Country Australia Submission date 04 Mar 2003 Date of decision 17 Mar 2006 Comment: Pursuant to rule 90 of JUTBCCPR/C/86/D/1184/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1241/en-US
Brown and Parish v. Jamaica
Brown and Parish v. Jamaica CCPR/C/66/D/665/1995 Communication number s : 665/1995 Author: Owen Brown and Burchell Parish Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 66 Country Jamaica Submission date 27 Feb 1995 Date of decision 29 Jul 1999 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/66/D/665/1995https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/791/en-US
Brown v. Jamaica
Brown v. Jamaica CCPR/C/65/D/775/1997 Communication number s : 775/1997 Author: Christopher Brown Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 65 Country Jamaica Submission date 17 Nov 1997 Date of decision 23 Mar 1999 Comment: An individual opinion JUTBCCPR/C/65/D/775/1997https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/778/en-US
Bulgakov v. Ukraine
Bulgakov v. Ukraine CCPR/C/106/D/1803/2008 Communication number s : 1803/2008 Author: Dmitriy Vladimirovich Bulgakov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 106 Country Ukraine Submission date 23 May 2008 Date of decision 29 Oct 2012 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/106/D/1803/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1270/en-US
C.C.M.C. v. Romania
C.C.M.C. v. Romania ROU 28/01/1999 00:00:00 06/11/2016 15:17:22 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of proceedings before administrative and judicial authorities in particular length of proceedings to obtain EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-16007
C.P.M. & M.O.R.M. v. Portugal
C.P.M. M.O.R.M. v. Portugal PRT 02/03/1999 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:02:55 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Excessive length of civil proceedings. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-9385
C.R. v. France
C.R. v. France FRA 23/12/2003 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:16:17 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of civil proceedings and absence of an effective remedy. Articles 6 1 and 13 Status of Execution: Case closed. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33147
C. v. Ireland
C. v. Ireland IRL 01/03/2012 00:00:00 27/10/2016 10:35:57 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of judicial proceedings and the absence of an effective domestic remedy. Article 6 1 and 13 Status of Execution: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3199
CABALA v. Slovakia
CABALA v. Slovakia SVK 06/12/2007 00:00:00 02/11/2016 13:55:44 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention and access to and efficient functioning of justice: Failure to examine promptly requests for release from detention on remand denial of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-8107