Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 2321 - 2340 of 3663
Gerasimov v. Kazakhstan
Gerasimov v. Kazakhstan CAT/C/48/D/433/2010 Communication number s : 433/2010 Author: Alexander Gerasimov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 48 Country Kazakhstan Submission date 22 Apr 2010 Date of decision 24 May 2012 Comment: The decision JUTBCAT/C/48/D/433/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/26/en-US
Goekce v. Austria
Goekce v. Austria CEDAW/C/39/D/5/2005 Communication number s : 005/2005 Author: Hakan Goekce Handan Goekce and Guelue Goekce descendants of the deceased Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 39 Country Austria Submission date 21 Jul 2004 Date of JUTBCEDAW/C/39/D/5/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1715/en-US
Gonzalez v. Guyana
Gonzalez v. Guyana CCPR/C/98/D/1246/2004 Communication number s : 1246/2004 Author: Patricia Angela Gonzalez Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 98 Country Guyana Submission date 14 Dec 2003 Date of decision 25 Mar 2010 Comment: The text on an JUTBCCPR/C/98/D/1246/2004https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1555/en-US
Gorji-Dinka v. Cameroon
Gorji Dinka v. Cameroon CCPR/C/83/D/1134/2002 Communication number s : 1134/2002 Author: Fongum Gorji Dinka Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 83 Country Cameroon Submission date 14 Mar 2002 Date of decision 17 Mar 2005 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/83/D/1134/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1174/en-US
Government comments on the fourth report on Albania
Government comments on the fourth report on Albania ALB 2009 12 15 2010 03 02 Government comments on the report on ALBANIA APPENDIX: GOVERNMENT S VIEWPOINT APPENDIXThe following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the ECRIALB-COM-IV-2010-001-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=ALB-COM-IV-2010-001-ENG
Government comments on the fourth report on Austria
Government comments on the fourth report on Austria AUT 2009 12 15 2010 03 02 Government comments on the report on AUSTRIA APPENDIX: GOVERNMENT S VIEWPOINT APPENDIXThe following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the ECRIAUT-COM-IV-2010-002-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=AUT-COM-IV-2010-002-ENG
Government comments on the fourth report on Estonia
Government comments on the fourth report on Estonia EST 2009 12 15 2010 03 02 Government comments on the report on ESTONIA APPENDIX: GOVERNMENT S VIEWPOINT APPENDIXThe following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the ECRIEST-COM-IV-2010-003-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=EST-COM-IV-2010-003-ENG
Government comments on the fourth report on Lithuania
Government comments on the fourth report on Lithuania LTU 2011 06 22 2011 09 13 Government comments on the report on LITHUANIA APPENDIX: GOVERNMENT S VIEWPOINT APPENDIXThe following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning ECRILTU-COM-IV-2011-038-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=LTU-COM-IV-2011-038-ENG
Government comments on the fourth report on Norway
Government comments on the fourth report on Norway NOR 2008 06 20 2009 02 24 Government comments on the report on NORWAY APPENDIX APPENDIXThe following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in Norway ECRI ECRINOR-COM-IV-2009-004-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=NOR-COM-IV-2009-004-ENG
Government comments on the fourth report on Portugal
Government comments on the fourth report on Portugal PRT 2013 03 21 2013 07 09 APPENDIX: GOVERNMENT S VIEWPOINT The following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in Portugal ECRI in accordance with its ECRIPRT-COM-IV-2013-020-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=PRT-COM-IV-2013-020-ENG
Government comments on the fourth report on Turkey
Government comments on the fourth report on Turkey TUR 2010 12 10 2011 02 08 Government comments on the report on TURKEY APPENDIX: GOVERNMENT S VIEWPOINT APPENDIXThe following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the ECRITUR-COM-IV-2011-005-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=TUR-COM-IV-2011-005-ENG
Government comments on the second report on Poland
Government comments on the second report on Poland POL 1999 12 10 2000 06 27 The following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in Poland. APPENDIX ECRI wishes to point out that the analysis contained in ECRIPOL-COM-II-2002-034-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=POL-COM-II-2002-034-ENG
Government comments on the third report on Italy
Government comments on the third report on Italy ITA 2005 12 16 2006 05 16 APPENDIX The following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in Italy ECRI wishes to point out that the analysis contained in its ECRIITA-COM-III-2006-019-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=ITA-COM-III-2006-019-ENG
Government comments on the third report on Latvia
Government comments on the third report on Latvia LVA 2007 06 29 2008 02 12 APPENDIX The following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in Latvia ECRI wishes to point out that the analysis contained in its ECRILVA-COM-III-2008-002-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=LVA-COM-III-2008-002-ENG
Government comments on the third report on Romania
Government comments on the third report on Romania ROU 2005 06 24 2006 02 21 APPENDIX The following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in Romania ECRI wishes to point out that the analysis contained in ECRIROU-COM-III-2006-003-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=ROU-COM-III-2006-003-ENG
Government comments on the third report on Ukraine
Government comments on the third report on Ukraine UKR 2007 06 29 2008 02 12 APPENDIX The following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in Ukraine ECRI wishes to point out that the analysis contained in ECRIUKR-COM-III-2008-004-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=UKR-COM-III-2008-004-ENG
Government comments on the third report on the Netherlands
Government comments on the third report on the Netherlands NLD 2007 06 29 2008 02 12 APPENDIX The following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in the Netherlands ECRI wishes to point out that the analysis ECRINLD-COM-III-2008-003-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=NLD-COM-III-2008-003-ENG
Government comments on the third report on the Russian Federation
Government comments on the third report on the Russian Federation RUS 2005 12 16 2006 05 16 APPENDIX The following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in the Russian Federation ECRI wishes to point out ECRIRUS-COM-III-2006-021-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=RUS-COM-III-2006-021-ENG
Govsha, Syritsa and Mezyak v. Belarus
Govsha Syritsa and Mezyak v. Belarus CCPR/C/105/D/1790/2008 Communication number s : 1790/2008 Author: Sergei Govsha Viktor Syritsa and Viktor Mezyak Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 105 Country Belarus Submission date 31 Mar 2008 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/105/D/1790/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1246/en-US
Graham and Morrison v. Jamaica
Graham and Morrison v. Jamaica CCPR/C/57/D/480/1991 Communication number s : 461/1991 Author: George Graham and Arthur Morrison Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 57 Country Jamaica Submission date 18 Mar 1991 Date of decision 25 Mar 1996 JUTBCCPR/C/57/D/480/1991https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/405/en-US