Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 2061 - 2080 of 2254
LASHMANKIN AND OTHERS v. Russia
LASHMANKIN AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 29/05/2017 00:00:00 20/06/2017 16:33:38 Case Description: The Lashmankin group mainly concerns violations of the right to freedom of assembly in different Russian cities between 2003 and 2018 violations of Article 11 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47097
Lederbauer v. Austria
Lederbauer v. Austria CCPR/C/90/D/1454/2006 Communication number s : 1454/2006 Author: Wolfgang Lederbauer Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 90 Country Austria Submission date 27 Sep 2005 Date of decision 13 Jul 2007 Comment: The text of an JUTBCCPR/C/90/D/1454/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1385/en-US
Lee and 388 others v. Republic of Korea
Lee and 388 others v. Republic of Korea CCPR/C/130/D/2776/2016 Communication number s : 2776/2016 Author: Jung Hee Lee and 388 others Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 130 Country Republic of Korea Submission date 11 Dec 2015 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/130/D/2776/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3288/en-US
M.A.K. v. Belgium
M.A.K. v. Belgium CCPR/C/119/D/2148/2012 Communication number s : 2148/2012 Author: M.A.K. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 119 Country Belgium Submission date 22 Nov 2011 Date of decision 28 Mar 2017 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/119/D/2148/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2262/en-US
M.A.M.N. v. United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
M.A.M.N. v. United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland CEDAW/C/76/D/141/2019 Communication number s : 141/2019 Author: M.A.M.N. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 76 Country United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland JUTBCEDAW/C/76/D/141/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3035/en-US
M.I.A.P. v. Spain
M.I.A.P. v. Spain CCPR/C/131/D/2558/2015 Communication number s : 2558/2015 Author: M.I.A.P. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 131 Country Spain Submission date 18 Dec 2014 Date of decision 15 Mar 2021 Comment: Individual opinion of JUTBCCPR/C/131/D/2558/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3488/en-US
MAKHARADZE AND SIKHARULIDZE v. Georgia
MAKHARADZE AND SIKHARULIDZE v. Georgia GEO 22/02/2012 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:07:28 Case Description: Makharadze and Sikharulidze 35254/07 judgment of 22/11/2011 final on 22/02/2012 Chkotua and Arkania 60909/08 decision final on 20/05/2014 Dzebniauri EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5840
MANOLE AND OTHERS v. the Republic of Moldova
MANOLE AND OTHERS v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 17/12/2009 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:38:31 Case Description: This case concerns undue interferences with the right of freedom of expression of journalists editors and producers working at the state television EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6752
MARESTI v. Croatia
MARESTI v. Croatia HRV 25/09/2009 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:24:46 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice/ Ne bis in idem: The applicant had been prosecuted and tried twice for the same offence before the Minor Offences Court and the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10101
MEXICO: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
MEXICO: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CAT/C/MEX/CO/7 NULL 2019 07 24T00:00:00 CAT United Nations CAT/C/MEX/CO/7 Convention against Torture Distr.: General 24 July 2019 and Other Cruel Inhuman English or Degrading Treatment Original: Spanish or Punishment UHRICAT/C/MEX/CO/7https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/420ac17c-9028-49c5-b43a-bb3378e785c0
MILLER v. the United Kingdom
MILLER v. the United Kingdom GBR 26/01/2005 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair proceedings due to the lack of independence and impartiality of the Army court martial which judged the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2636
MORRIS* v. the United Kingdom
MORRIS v. the United Kingdom GBR 26/05/2002 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair proceedings due to the lack of independence and impartiality of the Army court martial which judged the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2592
MURADYAN v. Armenia
MURADYAN v. Armenia ARM 24/02/2017 00:00:00 24/03/2017 11:39:16 Case Description: These cases concern the authorities failure to comply with their positive obligation to protect the applicants sons right to life during their military service as well as EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46287
Madafferi v. Australia
Madafferi v. Australia CCPR/C/81/D/1011/2001 Communication number s : 1011/2001 Author: Francesco Madafferi and Anna Maria Immacolata Madafferi Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 81 Country Australia Submission date 16 Jul 2001 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/81/D/1011/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1123/en-US
Mahabir v. Austria
Mahabir v. Austria CCPR/C/82/D/944/2000 Communication number s : 944/2000 Author: Chanderballi Mahabir Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 82 Country Austria Submission date 18 May 1999 Date of decision 26 Oct 2004 Comment: The text of JUTBCCPR/C/82/D/944/2000https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1142/en-US
Medina Vela v. Mexico
Medina Vela v. Mexico CRPD/C/22/D/32/2015 Communication number s : 32/2015 Author: Arturo Medina Vela Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 22 Country Mexico Submission date 19 Aug 2015 Date of decision 06 Sep 2019 Comment: This document has no JUTBCRPD/C/22/D/32/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3133/en-US
Mennen v. Netherlands
Mennen v. Netherlands CCPR/C/99/D/1797/2008 Communication number s : 1797/2008 Author: Thomas Wilhelmus Henricus Mennen Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 99 Country Netherlands Submission date 08 May 2008 Date of decision 27 Jul 2010 JUTBCCPR/C/99/D/1797/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1524/en-US
Mikhail Krasnov v. Kyrgyzstan
Mikhail Krasnov v. Kyrgyzstan CCPR/C/101/D/1402/2005 Communication number s : 1402/2005 Author: Tatyana Krasnova represented by counsel Independent Human Rights Group Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 101 Country Kyrgyzstan Submission date JUTBCCPR/C/101/D/1402/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2110/en-US
N.B.F. v. Spain
N.B.F. v. Spain CRC/C/79/D/11/2017 Communication number s : 011/2017 Author: N.B.F. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 79 Country Spain Submission date 15 Feb 2017 Date of decision 27 Sep 2018 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCRC/C/79/D/11/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2506/en-US
NAMAZOV v. Azerbaijan
NAMAZOV v. Azerbaijan AZE 30/05/2020 00:00:00 12/06/2020 15:42:45 Case Description: The case of Namazov concerns a violation of the applicant s right to respect for his private life on account of his disbarment in 2011 2012 in the absence of adequate EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55353