Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 2561 - 2580 of 3131
MILLER v. the United Kingdom
MILLER v. the United Kingdom GBR 26/01/2005 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair proceedings due to the lack of independence and impartiality of the Army court martial which judged the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2636
MITRINOVSKI v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia
MITRINOVSKI v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia MKD 30/07/2015 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:31:05 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair trial due to lacking objective and subjective impartiality in misconduct EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6578
MORRIS* v. the United Kingdom
MORRIS v. the United Kingdom GBR 26/05/2002 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair proceedings due to the lack of independence and impartiality of the Army court martial which judged the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2592
MURADYAN v. Armenia
MURADYAN v. Armenia ARM 24/02/2017 00:00:00 24/03/2017 11:39:16 Case Description: These cases concern the authorities failure to comply with their positive obligation to protect the applicants sons right to life during their military service as well as EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46287
MUSUC v. the Republic of Moldova
MUSUC v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 06/02/2008 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:38:31 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Unlawful arrest and detention on remand in criminal and administrative proceedings not based on a reasonable suspicion that EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6966
Madafferi v. Australia
Madafferi v. Australia CCPR/C/81/D/1011/2001 Communication number s : 1011/2001 Author: Francesco Madafferi and Anna Maria Immacolata Madafferi Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 81 Country Australia Submission date 16 Jul 2001 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/81/D/1011/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1123/en-US
Mahabir v. Austria
Mahabir v. Austria CCPR/C/82/D/944/2000 Communication number s : 944/2000 Author: Chanderballi Mahabir Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 82 Country Austria Submission date 18 May 1999 Date of decision 26 Oct 2004 Comment: The text of JUTBCCPR/C/82/D/944/2000https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1142/en-US
Mahuika et al. v. New Zealand
Mahuika et al. v. New Zealand CCPR/C/70/D/547/1993 Communication number s : 547/1993 Author: Apirana Mahuika et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 70 Country New Zealand Submission date 10 Dec 1992 Date of decision 27 Oct 2000 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/70/D/547/1993https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/897/en-US
Mansour Leghaei et al v. Australia
Mansour Leghaei et al v. Australia CCPR/C/113/D/1937/2010 Communication number s : 1937/2010 Author: Mansour Leghaei et al Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 113 Country Australia Submission date 16 Apr 2010 Date of decision 26 Mar 2015 JUTBCCPR/C/113/D/1937/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1951/en-US
Medina Vela v. Mexico
Medina Vela v. Mexico CRPD/C/22/D/32/2015 Communication number s : 32/2015 Author: Arturo Medina Vela Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 22 Country Mexico Submission date 19 Aug 2015 Date of decision 06 Sep 2019 Comment: This document has no JUTBCRPD/C/22/D/32/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3133/en-US
Medvedeva v. Russian Federation
Medvedeva v. Russian Federation CEDAW/C/63/D/60/2013 Communication number s : 60/2013 Author: Svetlana Medvedeva Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 63 Country Russian Federation Submission date 05 May 2013 Date of decision 25 Feb 2016 JUTBCEDAW/C/63/D/60/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3028/en-US
Mennen v. Netherlands
Mennen v. Netherlands CCPR/C/99/D/1797/2008 Communication number s : 1797/2008 Author: Thomas Wilhelmus Henricus Mennen Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 99 Country Netherlands Submission date 08 May 2008 Date of decision 27 Jul 2010 JUTBCCPR/C/99/D/1797/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1524/en-US
Michael Lockrey v. Australia
Michael Lockrey v. Australia CRPD/C/15/D/13/2013 Communication number s : 013/2013 Author: Michael Lockrey Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 15 Country Australia Submission date 08 Apr 2013 Date of decision 01 Apr 2016 Comment: This document JUTBCRPD/C/15/D/13/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2143/en-US
Mikhail Krasnov v. Kyrgyzstan
Mikhail Krasnov v. Kyrgyzstan CCPR/C/101/D/1402/2005 Communication number s : 1402/2005 Author: Tatyana Krasnova represented by counsel Independent Human Rights Group Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 101 Country Kyrgyzstan Submission date JUTBCCPR/C/101/D/1402/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2110/en-US
Mwamba v. Zambia
Mwamba v. Zambia CCPR/C/98/D/1520/2006 Communication number s : 1520/2006 Author: Munguwambuto Kabwe Peter Mwamba Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 98 Country Zambia Submission date 29 Jun 2005 Date of decision 10 Mar 2010 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/98/D/1520/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1559/en-US
N.B.F. v. Spain
N.B.F. v. Spain CRC/C/79/D/11/2017 Communication number s : 011/2017 Author: N.B.F. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 79 Country Spain Submission date 15 Feb 2017 Date of decision 27 Sep 2018 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCRC/C/79/D/11/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2506/en-US
N.T.W. v. Switzerland
N.T.W. v. Switzerland CAT/C/48/D/414/2010 Communication number s : 414/2010 Author: N.T.W. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 48 Country Switzerland Submission date 18 Mar 2010 Date of decision 16 May 2012 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/48/D/414/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/34/en-US
NAMAZOV v. Azerbaijan
NAMAZOV v. Azerbaijan AZE 30/05/2020 00:00:00 12/06/2020 15:42:45 Case Description: The case of Namazov concerns a violation of the applicant s right to respect for his private life on account of his disbarment in 2011 2012 in the absence of adequate EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55353
NAMIBIA: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
NAMIBIA: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CAT/C/NAM/CO/2 NULL 2017 02 01T00:00:00 CAT United Nations CAT/C/NAM/CO/2 Distr.: General Convention against Tortureand Other Cruel Inhumanor 1 February 2017 Degrading Treatmentor Punishment Original: English Committee UHRICAT/C/NAM/CO/2https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/8bdde1bd-0edd-418b-a888-b67fd70a77a1
NAVALNYY AND GUNKO v. Russia
NAVALNYY AND GUNKO v. Russia RUS 10/02/2021 00:00:00 03/03/2021 17:11:43 Case Description: The Navalnyy and Ofitserov case concerns the criminal conviction in 2013 of Mr Aleksey Navalnyy a political activist opposition leader anti corruption campaigner EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56743