Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 805
11. c Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the sale of children, child prostitution and child pornography
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 11. c Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the sale of children child prostitution and child pornography New York 25 May 2000 Entry into force : 18 January 2002 in UNIV-11-chttps://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-11-c&chapter=4&clang=_en
A/HRC/37/15/Add.1: Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review - Japan - Addendum - Views on conclusions and/or recommendations, voluntary commitments and replies presented by the State under review
United Nations A/HRC/37/15/Add.1 General Assembly Distr.: General 1 March 2018 Original: English Human Rights Council Thirty seventh session Agenda item 6 Universal Periodic Review Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review Japan UPRA/HRC/37/15/Add.1https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/reports/ahrc3715add1-report-working-group-universal-periodic-review-japan-addendum-views
AFANASYEV v. Ukraine
AFANASYEV v. Ukraine UKR 05/07/2005 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: These cases concern physical or psychological torture and/or ill treatment by the police mostly in order to obtain confessions substantive violations of Article 3 lack of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31348
ANNONI DI GUSSOLA AND OTHERS v. France
ANNONI DI GUSSOLA AND OTHERS v. France FRA 14/02/2001 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:14:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Lack of access to a court due to the Court of Cassation President s decision under a specific provision of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33009
ASSOCIATION FOR SOLIDARITY WITH JEHOVAH WITNESSES AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
ASSOCIATION FOR SOLIDARITY WITH JEHOVAH WITNESSES AND OTHERS v. TURKEY TUR 17/10/2016 00:00:00 17/11/2016 15:23:26 Case Description: The case concerns a violation of the right to freedom of religion on account of the application of urban planning EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-39509
AZIZOGLU AND AZIZOGLU A.S. v. Turkey
AZIZOGLU AND AZIZOGLU A.S. v. Turkey TUR 08/12/2020 00:00:00 10/12/2020 21:35:28 Case Description: Functioning of justice and protection of property rights: Authorities failure to take the necessary steps to execute two judgments in the applicants favour EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56395
Additional Protocol to the European Convention on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters (ETS No. 099)
Additional Protocol to the European Convention on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters ETS No. 099 099 Strasbourg 1978 03 17T00:00:00 Treaty open for signature by the member States signatories to Treaty ETS 30 and for accession by the non member States COEETS No. 099https://rm.coe.int/1680077975
Allakulov v. Uzbekistan
Allakulov v. Uzbekistan CCPR/C/120/D/2430/2014 Communication number s : 2430/2014 Author: Khidirnazar Allakulov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 120 Country Uzbekistan Submission date 09 Sep 2011 Date of decision 19 Jul 2017 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/120/D/2430/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2318/en-US
Alzery v. Sweden
Alzery v. Sweden CCPR/C/88/D/1416/2005 Communication number s : 1416/2005 Author: Mohammed Alzery Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 88 Country Sweden Submission date 29 Jul 2005 Date of decision 25 Oct 2006 Comment: Pursuant to rule 90 of JUTBCCPR/C/88/D/1416/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1300/en-US
Ashby v. Trinidad and Tobago
Ashby v. Trinidad and Tobago CCPR/C/74/D/580/1994 Communication number s : 580/1994 Author: Glenn Ashby Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 74 Country Trinidad and Tobago Submission date 06 Jul 1994 Date of decision 21 Mar 2002 Comment: Under JUTBCCPR/C/74/D/580/1994https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/951/en-US
B. v. Belgium
B. v. Belgium BEL 19/11/2012 00:00:00 25/10/2016 12:18:05 Case Description: Protection of family life: Unnecessary interference due to an appeal court s decision on a forced return to an allegedly abusive father of a child well integrated in the host EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1253
BAKANOVA v. Lithuania
BAKANOVA v. Lithuania LTU 31/08/2016 00:00:00 27/10/2016 16:57:59 Case Description: Right to life: Lack of effective investigations into the death of the applicant s husband in 2007 on board of a ship off the coast of Brazil. Article 2 procedural limb EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4367
BALSAN v. Romania
BALSAN v. Romania ROU 23/08/2017 00:00:00 15/09/2017 15:07:24 Case Description: This case concerns the failure of the investigating prosecuting and judicial authorities to comply with their positive obligation under Article 3 to protect the applicant from EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47601
BOLJEVIC v. Serbia
BOLJEVIC v. Serbia SRB 16/09/2020 00:00:00 29/09/2020 17:20:46 Case Description: This case concerns a violation of the applicant s right to respect for his private life on account of the domestic courts refusal to reopen the time barred paternity EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55953
BORDEIANU v. the Republic of Moldova
BORDEIANU v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 11/04/2011 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:38:31 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the violation of the applicants rights to respect for their family life on account of the failure by the authorities to execute EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7144
BRADARIC v. Bosnia and Herzegovina
BRADARIC v. Bosnia and Herzegovina BIH 03/12/2019 00:00:00 09/12/2019 17:24:35 Case Description: Functioning of justice and protection of property rights: Excessive length of enforcement proceedings to execute final domestic court s judgments. Articles 6 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54323
BRAGADIREANU v. Romania
BRAGADIREANU v. Romania ROU 06/03/2008 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: This group currently consisting of 121 judgments 1 mainly concerns the inhuman and/or degrading treatment suffered by the applicants due to overcrowding and poor EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12985
BRAHIMAJ v. Albania
BRAHIMAJ v. Albania ALB 06/10/2016 00:00:00 24/10/2016 16:48:47 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice protection of property and lack of an effective remedy: Domestic authorities failure to execute final judicial decisions EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-277
BRODA AND BOJARA v. Poland
BRODA AND BOJARA v. Poland POL 29/09/2021 00:00:00 22/10/2021 14:42:32 Case Description: The Reczkowicz group concerns infringements of the right to a tribunal established by law due to the fact that the judges of the various chambers in the Supreme Court EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58717
BUCUR AND TOMA v. Romania
BUCUR AND TOMA v. Romania ROU 08/04/2013 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: This case concerns the disclosure by the first applicant a military official in the Romanian Intelligence Service SRI of information on wide scale illegal telephone EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12840