Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 967
A. B. v. Sweden
A. B. v. Sweden CAT/C/54/D/539/2013 Communication number s : 539/2013 Author: A. B. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 54 Country Sweden Submission date 08 Mar 2013 Date of decision 11 May 2015 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/54/D/539/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2043/en-US
A.M. v. Italy
A.M. v. Italy CCPR/C/35/D/266/1987 Communication number s : 266/1987 Author: A.M. alleged victim s brother name deleted Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 35 Country Italy Submission date 05 Nov 1987 Date of decision 23 Mar 1989 JUTBCCPR/C/35/D/266/1987https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/386/en-US
AFANASYEV v. Ukraine
AFANASYEV v. Ukraine UKR 05/07/2005 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: These cases concern physical or psychological torture and/or ill treatment by the police mostly in order to obtain confessions substantive violations of Article 3 lack of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31348
ASSOCIATION FOR SOLIDARITY WITH JEHOVAH WITNESSES AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
ASSOCIATION FOR SOLIDARITY WITH JEHOVAH WITNESSES AND OTHERS v. TURKEY TUR 17/10/2016 00:00:00 17/11/2016 15:23:26 Case Description: The case concerns a violation of the right to freedom of religion on account of the application of urban planning EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-39509
Aalbersberg et al. v. Netherlands
Aalbersberg et al. v. Netherlands CCPR/C/87/D/1440/2005 Communication number s : 1440/2005 Author: Aalbersberg and 2 084 other Dutch citizens Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 87 Country Netherlands Submission date 02 Aug 2005 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/87/D/1440/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1291/en-US
Achille Benoit Zogo Andela v. Cameroon
Achille Benoit Zogo Andela v. Cameroon CCPR/C/121/D/2764/2016 Communication number s : 2764/2016 Author: Cyrille Gervais Moutono Zogo Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 121 Country Cameroon Submission date 28 Oct 2014 Date of decision 08 Nov JUTBCCPR/C/121/D/2764/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2360/en-US
Al Adam v. Saudi Arabia
Al Adam v. Saudi Arabia CRPD/C/20/D/38/2016 Communication number s : 038/2016 Author: Al Adam Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 20 Country Saudi Arabia Submission date 05 May 2016 Date of decision 20 Sep 2018 Comment: This document has no JUTBCRPD/C/20/D/38/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2513/en-US
Al-Rabassi v. Libya
Al Rabassi v. Libya CCPR/C/111/D/1860/2009 Communication number s : 1860/2009 Author: Mufteh Younis Muftah Al Rabassi represented by human rights organization Alkarama Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 111 Country Libya Submission date 16 JUTBCCPR/C/111/D/1860/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1840/en-US
Allakulov v. Uzbekistan
Allakulov v. Uzbekistan CCPR/C/120/D/2430/2014 Communication number s : 2430/2014 Author: Khidirnazar Allakulov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 120 Country Uzbekistan Submission date 09 Sep 2011 Date of decision 19 Jul 2017 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/120/D/2430/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2318/en-US
Alzery v. Sweden
Alzery v. Sweden CCPR/C/88/D/1416/2005 Communication number s : 1416/2005 Author: Mohammed Alzery Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 88 Country Sweden Submission date 29 Jul 2005 Date of decision 25 Oct 2006 Comment: Pursuant to rule 90 of JUTBCCPR/C/88/D/1416/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1300/en-US
Anton v. Algeria
Anton v. Algeria CCPR/C/88/D/1424/2005 Communication number s : 1424/2005 Author: Armand Anton Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 88 Country Algeria Submission date 24 Nov 2004 Date of decision 01 Nov 2006 Comment: In accordance with JUTBCCPR/C/88/D/1424/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1324/en-US
Asensi Martínez v. Paraguay
Asensi Mart nez v. Paraguay CCPR/C/95/D/1407/2005 Communication number s : 1407/2005 Author: Juan Asensi Mart nez Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 95 Country Paraguay Submission date 26 Apr 2005 Date of decision 27 Mar 2009 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/95/D/1407/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1492/en-US
Ashby v. Trinidad and Tobago
Ashby v. Trinidad and Tobago CCPR/C/74/D/580/1994 Communication number s : 580/1994 Author: Glenn Ashby Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 74 Country Trinidad and Tobago Submission date 06 Jul 1994 Date of decision 21 Mar 2002 Comment: Under JUTBCCPR/C/74/D/580/1994https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/951/en-US
BALSAN v. Romania
BALSAN v. Romania ROU 23/08/2017 00:00:00 15/09/2017 15:07:24 Case Description: This case concerns the failure of the investigating prosecuting and judicial authorities to comply with their positive obligation under Article 3 to protect the applicant from EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47601
BELGIUM : CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
BELGIUM : CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CERD/C/BEL/CO/16 19 NULL 2014 03 13T00:00:00 CERD United Nations CERD/C/BEL/CO/16 19 International Convention on Distr.: General 14 March 2014 the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination Original: English UHRICERD/C/BEL/CO/16-19https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/3947c82d-0d20-4975-93ea-d0a8eacd948b
BORDEIANU v. the Republic of Moldova
BORDEIANU v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 11/04/2011 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:38:31 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the violation of the applicants rights to respect for their family life on account of the failure by the authorities to execute EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7144
BRADARIC v. Bosnia and Herzegovina
BRADARIC v. Bosnia and Herzegovina BIH 03/12/2019 00:00:00 09/12/2019 17:24:35 Case Description: Functioning of justice and protection of property rights: Excessive length of enforcement proceedings to execute final domestic court s judgments. Articles 6 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54323
BRAGADIREANU v. Romania
BRAGADIREANU v. Romania ROU 06/03/2008 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: This group currently consisting of 121 judgments 1 mainly concerns the inhuman and/or degrading treatment suffered by the applicants due to overcrowding and poor EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12985
BRODA AND BOJARA v. Poland
BRODA AND BOJARA v. Poland POL 29/09/2021 00:00:00 22/10/2021 14:42:32 Case Description: The Reczkowicz group concerns infringements of the right to a tribunal established by law due to the fact that the judges of the various chambers in the Supreme Court EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58717
BUCUR AND TOMA v. Romania
BUCUR AND TOMA v. Romania ROU 08/04/2013 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: This case concerns the disclosure by the first applicant a military official in the Romanian Intelligence Service SRI of information on wide scale illegal telephone EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12840