Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 401 - 420 of 3642
CANEA CATHOLIC CHURCH v. Greece
CANEA CATHOLIC CHURCH v. Greece GRC 16/12/1997 00:00:00 07/11/2016 09:36:22 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Denial of access to a court due to the applicant church s inability to take legal action as a result of civil EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-22146
CANKOCAK v. Turkey
CANKOCAK v. Turkey TUR 20/05/2001 00:00:00 07/11/2016 17:30:19 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of criminal proceedings before Martial Law Courts jurisdiction abolished by law in 1993 and also partly EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-26806
CANSAD AND OTHERS v. Turkey
CANSAD AND OTHERS v. Turkey TUR 13/06/2018 00:00:00 29/06/2018 15:03:37 Case Description: Functioning of justice and lack of a remedy: Unfair criminal proceedings due to their excessive length and lack of access to a lawyer during the initial stage of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49703
CANTAFIO v. Italy
CANTAFIO v. Italy ITA 26/09/1995 00:00:00 28/11/2016 11:43:17 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Denial of access to a court in order to resolve a dispute dating from 1986 with the Municipality of Decollatura since the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-45090
CANZANO v. Italy
CANZANO v. Italy ITA 21/02/2001 00:00:00 28/11/2016 10:46:44 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Excessive length of civil proceeding before the Court of Audits. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-43641
CAPCIKOVA v. Slovakia
CAPCIKOVA v. Slovakia SVK 19/04/2001 00:00:00 02/11/2016 13:55:44 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Excessive length of civil proceedings. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: Individual EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7835
CAPDEVILLE v. Portugal
CAPDEVILLE v. Portugal PRT 09/11/2000 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:02:55 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Excessive length of civil proceedings. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: Individual EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-9443
CAPEAU v. Belgium
CAPEAU v. Belgium BEL 06/06/2005 00:00:00 25/10/2016 14:46:28 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Breach of the presumption of innocence on account of the Ministry of Justice s refusal upheld by the Appeals Board to grant a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1399
CAPITANI AND CAMPANELLA v. Italy
CAPITANI AND CAMPANELLA v. Italy ITA 17/08/2011 00:00:00 28/11/2016 10:48:54 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Impossibility to request a public hearing in proceedings with regard to preventive measures aimed at the seizure EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-44725
CARAIAN v. Romania
CARAIAN v. Romania ROU 19/10/2015 00:00:00 06/11/2016 16:19:47 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Breach of the presumption of innocence in criminal proceedings terminated by a prosecutor s decision on grounds that they were EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17595
CARAMAN v. the Republic of Moldova
CARAMAN v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 15/09/2020 00:00:00 21/09/2020 17:50:21 Case Description: Functioning of justice / protection of property rights / lack of a remedy: State s failure to enforce final domestic judgments awarding the applicants social EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55893
CARDILLO v. Italy
CARDILLO v. Italy ITA 29/06/2000 00:00:00 28/11/2016 10:46:44 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Excessive length of civil proceedings before Court of Audit. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-43057
CARIC v. Croatia
CARIC v. Croatia HRV 24/04/2014 00:00:00 03/11/2016 15:28:29 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of civil proceedings due to the comparatively low level of compensation awarded by the Constitutional Court. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12069
CARMEL SALIBA v. Malta
CARMEL SALIBA v. Malta MLT 24/04/2017 00:00:00 24/05/2017 17:23:22 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair civil proceedings concerning civil liability for a robbery due to the combination of procedural shortcomings EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46865
CARNASCIALI v. Italy
CARNASCIALI v. Italy ITA 29/01/2004 00:00:00 28/11/2016 10:46:44 Case Description: Protection of property / access to and effective functioning of justice: Interference due to the applicant s prolonged inability to recover possession of her apartment lack EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-44322
CARROZZA v. Italy
CARROZZA v. Italy ITA 19/10/1999 00:00:00 28/11/2016 10:46:44 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Excessive length of criminal proceedings. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: Individual EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-43778
CARUSO v. Italy
CARUSO v. Italy ITA 05/10/2000 00:00:00 28/11/2016 10:46:44 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Excessive length of civil proceedings before labour courts. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-43139
CASE OF A AND B v. NORWAY
CASE OF A AND B v. NORWAY 24130/11 29758/11 KJELDAHL R. NOR 11/15/2016 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 Right not to be tried or punished twice general Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 Right not to be tried or punished twice Criminal ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1115JUD002413011https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-168972
CASE OF A. AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF A. AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 3455/05 BIRNBERG PIERCE AND PARTNERS GBR 2/19/2009 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 3 No violation of Art. 13 3 Preliminary objection rejected Government not precluded from raising defence under Art. 5 1 f or ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0219JUD000345505https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-91403
CASE OF A.B. v. THE NETHERLANDS
CASE OF A.B. v. THE NETHERLANDS 37328/97 N/A NLD 1/29/2002 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed non exhaustion Violation of Art. 8 in respect of control of correspondence with the Commission and with lawyer No violation of Art. 8 in respect of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0129JUD003732897https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-60019