Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 61 - 80 of 4004
Aliboeva v. Tajikistan
Aliboeva v. Tajikistan CCPR/C/85/D/985/2001 Communication number s : 985/2001 Author: Kholinisso Aliboeva Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 85 Country Tajikistan Submission date 10 Jul 2001 Date of decision 18 Oct 2005 Comment: Under rule 92 JUTBCCPR/C/85/D/985/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1195/en-US
Allakulov v. Uzbekistan
Allakulov v. Uzbekistan CCPR/C/120/D/2430/2014 Communication number s : 2430/2014 Author: Khidirnazar Allakulov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 120 Country Uzbekistan Submission date 09 Sep 2011 Date of decision 19 Jul 2017 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/120/D/2430/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2318/en-US
Almas Kusherbaev v. Kazakhstan
Almas Kusherbaev v. Kazakhstan CCPR/C/107/D/2027/2011 Communication number s : 2027/2011 Author: Almas Kusherbaev Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 107 Country Kazakhstan Submission date 06 Sep 2010 Date of decision 25 Mar 2013 JUTBCCPR/C/107/D/2027/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1278/en-US
Alzery v. Sweden
Alzery v. Sweden CCPR/C/88/D/1416/2005 Communication number s : 1416/2005 Author: Mohammed Alzery Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 88 Country Sweden Submission date 29 Jul 2005 Date of decision 25 Oct 2006 Comment: Pursuant to rule 90 of JUTBCCPR/C/88/D/1416/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1300/en-US
Arkauz Arana v. France
Arkauz Arana v. France CAT/C/23/D/63/1997 Communication number s : 063/1997 Author: Josu Arkauz Arana Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 23 Country France Submission date 16 Dec 1996 Date of decision 09 Nov 1999 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/23/D/63/1997https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/211/en-US
Arutyunyan v. Uzbekistan
Arutyunyan v. Uzbekistan CCPR/C/80/D/917/2000 Communication number s : 917/2000 Author: Karina Arutyunyan Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 80 Country Uzbekistan Submission date 07 Mar 2000 Date of decision 29 Mar 2004 Comment: Under rule 86 JUTBCCPR/C/80/D/917/2000https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1099/en-US
Askarov v. Kyrgyzstan
Askarov v. Kyrgyzstan CCPR/C/116/D/2231/2012 Communication number s : 2231/2012 Author: Azimjan Askarov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 116 Country Kyrgyzstan Submission date 12 Nov 2012 Date of decision 31 Mar 2016 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/116/D/2231/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2112/en-US
B.A.C. v. Greece
B.A.C. v. Greece GRC 13/01/2017 00:00:00 04/04/2017 15:59:50 Case Description: The case concerned the failure by the Greek authorities to decide on an asylum application lodged by the applicant for more than twelve years. The Court held that the above EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46537
B.A. et al. v. Austria
B.A. et al. v. Austria CCPR/C/127/D/2956/2017 Communication number s : 2956/2017 Author: B.A. et al. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 127 Country Austria Submission date 08 Feb 2017 Date of decision 08 Nov 2019 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/127/D/2956/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2805/en-US
B.B. v. Sweden
B.B. v. Sweden CCPR/C/131/D/3069/2017 Communication number s : 3069/2017 Author: B.B. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 131 Country Sweden Submission date 11 Dec 2017 Date of decision 16 Mar 2021 Comment: Joint opinion of Committee members JUTBCCPR/C/131/D/3069/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3248/en-US
B.D.K. et al. v. Canada
B.D.K. et al. v. Canada CCPR/C/125/D/3041/2017 Communication number s : 3041/2017 Author: B.D.K. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 125 Country Canada Submission date 07 Nov 2017 Date of decision 19 Mar 2019 Comment: Individual opinion of Jos JUTBCCPR/C/125/D/3041/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2916/en-US
B.K. v. Norway
B.K. v. Norway CAT/C/62/D/722/2015 Communication number s : 722/2015 Author: B.K. not represented by counsel Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 62 Country Norway Submission date 21 Dec 2015 Date of decision 04 Dec 2017 Comment: JUTBCAT/C/62/D/722/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2414/en-US
B.S. and N.K. v. Canada
B.S. and N.K. v. Canada CAT/C/71/D/798/2017 Communication number s : 798/2017 Author: B.S. and N.K. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 71 Country Canada Submission date 13 Jan 2017 Date of decision 23 Jul 2020 Comment: Individual JUTBCAT/C/71/D/798/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3425/en-US
B.S. v. Canada
B.S. v. Canada CAT/C/27/D/166/2000 Communication number s : 166/2000 Author: B.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 27 Country Canada Submission date 22 Apr 1999 Date of decision 14 Nov 2001 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCAT/C/27/D/166/2000https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/178/en-US
B.Z. et al. v. Albania
B.Z. et al. v. Albania CCPR/C/121/D/2837/2016 Communication number s : 2837/2016 Author: B.Z. et al. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 121 Country Albania Submission date 13 Jan 2016 Date of decision 08 Nov 2017 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/121/D/2837/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2362/en-US
BACKOVIC v. Serbia
BACKOVIC v. Serbia SRB 07/05/2012 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:00:18 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Lack of access to court due to impossibility to seek judicial review of the administrative authorities refusal to register an EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-8925
BAHRAIN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
BAHRAIN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CAT/C/BHR/CO/2 3 NULL 2017 05 29T00:00:00 CAT United Nations CAT/C/BHR/CO/2 3 Convention against Torture Distr.: General 29 May 2017 and Other Cruel Inhuman or Degrading Treatment Original: English or Punishment Committee UHRICAT/C/BHR/CO/2-3https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/2b4b69f2-8805-4d8f-900f-73aa61bc578e
BAJIC v. North Macedonia
BAJIC v. North Macedonia MKD 10/09/2021 00:00:00 23/09/2021 15:54:44 Case Description: This case concerns a violation of the applicant s right to a fair trial due to the failure of the Supreme Court to communicate to the applicant the public prosecutor s EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58423
BAK v. Poland
BAK v. Poland POL 16/04/2007 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: The cases of Bak and Majewski concern the excessive length of criminal and civil proceedings respectively violations of Article 6 1 . They also concern certain problems in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20594
BALITSKIY v. Ukraine
BALITSKIY v. Ukraine UKR 03/02/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the convictions of the applicants between 2002 and 2011 on the basis of self incriminating statements made in the absence of a lawyer and in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31116