Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 101 - 120 of 4622
Arutyunyan v. Uzbekistan
Arutyunyan v. Uzbekistan CCPR/C/80/D/917/2000 Communication number s : 917/2000 Author: Karina Arutyunyan Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 80 Country Uzbekistan Submission date 07 Mar 2000 Date of decision 29 Mar 2004 Comment: Under rule 86 JUTBCCPR/C/80/D/917/2000https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1099/en-US
Ashby v. Trinidad and Tobago
Ashby v. Trinidad and Tobago CCPR/C/74/D/580/1994 Communication number s : 580/1994 Author: Glenn Ashby Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 74 Country Trinidad and Tobago Submission date 06 Jul 1994 Date of decision 21 Mar 2002 Comment: Under JUTBCCPR/C/74/D/580/1994https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/951/en-US
Askarov v. Kyrgyzstan
Askarov v. Kyrgyzstan CCPR/C/116/D/2231/2012 Communication number s : 2231/2012 Author: Azimjan Askarov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 116 Country Kyrgyzstan Submission date 12 Nov 2012 Date of decision 31 Mar 2016 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/116/D/2231/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2112/en-US
Assenova Naidenova et al. v. Bulgaria
Assenova Naidenova et al. v. Bulgaria CCPR/C/106/D/2073/2011 Communication number s : 2073/2011 Author: Liliana Assenova Naidenova et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 106 Country Bulgaria Submission date 25 Jun 2011 Date of decision 30 JUTBCCPR/C/106/D/2073/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1464/en-US
Aung v. Canada
Aung v. Canada CAT/C/36/D/273/2005 Communication number s : 273/2005 Author: Thu Aung Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 36 Country Canada Submission date 13 Jul 2005 Date of decision 15 May 2006 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/36/D/273/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/117/en-US
B.A. et al. v. Austria
B.A. et al. v. Austria CCPR/C/127/D/2956/2017 Communication number s : 2956/2017 Author: B.A. et al. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 127 Country Austria Submission date 08 Feb 2017 Date of decision 08 Nov 2019 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/127/D/2956/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2805/en-US
B.B. v. Sweden
B.B. v. Sweden CCPR/C/131/D/3069/2017 Communication number s : 3069/2017 Author: B.B. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 131 Country Sweden Submission date 11 Dec 2017 Date of decision 16 Mar 2021 Comment: Joint opinion of Committee members JUTBCCPR/C/131/D/3069/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3248/en-US
B.D.K. et al. v. Canada
B.D.K. et al. v. Canada CCPR/C/125/D/3041/2017 Communication number s : 3041/2017 Author: B.D.K. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 125 Country Canada Submission date 07 Nov 2017 Date of decision 19 Mar 2019 Comment: Individual opinion of Jos JUTBCCPR/C/125/D/3041/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2916/en-US
B.K. v. Norway
B.K. v. Norway CAT/C/62/D/722/2015 Communication number s : 722/2015 Author: B.K. not represented by counsel Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 62 Country Norway Submission date 21 Dec 2015 Date of decision 04 Dec 2017 Comment: JUTBCAT/C/62/D/722/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2414/en-US
B.S.S. v. Canada
B.S.S. v. Canada CAT/C/32/D/183/2001 Communication number s : 183/2001 Author: B.S.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 32 Country Canada Submission date 07 Mar 2001 Date of decision 12 May 2004 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/32/D/183/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/149/en-US
B.S. and N.K. v. Canada
B.S. and N.K. v. Canada CAT/C/71/D/798/2017 Communication number s : 798/2017 Author: B.S. and N.K. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 71 Country Canada Submission date 13 Jan 2017 Date of decision 23 Jul 2020 Comment: Individual JUTBCAT/C/71/D/798/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3425/en-US
B.S. v. Canada
B.S. v. Canada CAT/C/27/D/166/2000 Communication number s : 166/2000 Author: B.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 27 Country Canada Submission date 22 Apr 1999 Date of decision 14 Nov 2001 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCAT/C/27/D/166/2000https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/178/en-US
B.Z. et al. v. Albania
B.Z. et al. v. Albania CCPR/C/121/D/2837/2016 Communication number s : 2837/2016 Author: B.Z. et al. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 121 Country Albania Submission date 13 Jan 2016 Date of decision 08 Nov 2017 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/121/D/2837/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2362/en-US
BAHRAIN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
BAHRAIN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CAT/C/BHR/CO/2 3 NULL 2017 05 29T00:00:00 CAT United Nations CAT/C/BHR/CO/2 3 Convention against Torture Distr.: General 29 May 2017 and Other Cruel Inhuman or Degrading Treatment Original: English or Punishment Committee UHRICAT/C/BHR/CO/2-3https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/2b4b69f2-8805-4d8f-900f-73aa61bc578e
BALAJEVS v. Latvia
BALAJEVS v. Latvia LVA 28/07/2016 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:30:55 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment: Ill treatment of prisoners by escort officers in the premises of the Riga Regional Court in and lack of effective investigations. Article 3 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12668
BALAN v. the Republic of Moldova
BALAN v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 29/04/2008 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:38:31 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference as a result of the unlawful use as a background for the identity cards issued by the Ministry of Internal EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6790
BALITSKIY v. Ukraine
BALITSKIY v. Ukraine UKR 03/02/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the convictions of the applicants between 2002 and 2011 on the basis of self incriminating statements made in the absence of a lawyer and in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31116
BALOGH v. Hungary
BALOGH v. Hungary HUN 20/10/2004 00:00:00 03/11/2016 08:47:27 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment: Alleged ill treatment by police officers during interrogation and failure to provide a plausible explanation for the injuries despite an EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-11286
BALSAN v. Romania
BALSAN v. Romania ROU 23/08/2017 00:00:00 15/09/2017 15:07:24 Case Description: This case concerns the failure of the investigating prosecuting and judicial authorities to comply with their positive obligation under Article 3 to protect the applicant from EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47601
BARCZA AND OTHERS v. Hungary
BARCZA AND OTHERS v. Hungary HUN 11/01/2017 00:00:00 26/04/2017 16:15:53 Case Description: This group concerns lengthy expropriation proceedings hindering the use of the property in question. Barcza: Violation of the right to protection of property EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46703