Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 8241 - 8260 of 8277
X. v. Republic of Korea
X. v. Republic of Korea CCPR/C/110/D/1908/2009 Communication number s : 1908/2009 Author: X. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 110 Country Republic of Korea Submission date 19 Oct 2009 Date of decision 25 Mar 2014 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/110/D/1908/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1809/en-US
X v. Slovenia
X v. Slovenia SVN 28/09/2012 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:31:49 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Authorities failure to exercise the required diligence in the proceedings concerning the withdrawal of the applicant s parental rights which EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7220
X. v. Sri Lanka
X. v. Sri Lanka CCPR/C/120/D/2256/2013 Communication number s : 2256/2013 Author: X. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 120 Country Sri Lanka Submission date 11 Feb 2013 Date of decision 27 Jul 2017 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/120/D/2256/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2344/en-US
X v. Switzerland
X v. Switzerland CAT/C/71/D/900/2018 Communication number s : 900/2018 Author: X Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 71 Country Switzerland Submission date 04 Dec 2018 Date of decision 22 Jul 2021 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/71/D/900/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3362/en-US
X v. Switzerland
X v. Switzerland CAT/C/59/D/686/2015 Communication number s : 686/2015 Author: X Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 58 Country Switzerland Submission date 02 Jun 2015 Date of decision 05 Dec 2016 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/59/D/686/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2183/en-US
Y.B. and N.S. v. Belgium
Y.B. and N.S. v. Belgium CRC/C/79/D/12/2017 Communication number s : 012/2017 Author: Y.B. and N.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 79 Country Belgium Submission date 22 Mar 2017 Date of decision 27 Sep 2018 Comment: This document has no JUTBCRC/C/79/D/12/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2421/en-US
Y.H.A. v. Australia
Y.H.A. v. Australia CAT/C/27/D/162/2000 Communication number s : 162/2000 Author: Y.H.A. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 27 Country Australia Submission date 14 Apr 2000 Date of decision 23 Nov 2001 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/27/D/162/2000https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/195/en-US
Y.L. v. Canada
Y.L. v. Canada CCPR/C/27/D/112/1981 Communication number s : 112/1981 Author: Y.L. name deleted Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 27 Country Canada Submission date 07 Dec 1981 Date of decision 08 Apr 1986 Comment: Individual opinion JUTBCCPR/C/27/D/112/1981https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/745/en-US
Y.R. v. Australia
Y.R. v. Australia CAT/C/61/D/713/2015 Communication number s : 713/2015 Author: Y.R. represented by counsel Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 61 Country Australia Submission date 27 Oct 2015 Date of decision 03 Aug 2017 Comment: Decision of JUTBCAT/C/61/D/713/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2277/en-US
Y.S. v. Australia
Y.S. v. Australia CAT/C/59/D/633/2014 Communication number s : 633/2014 Author: Y.S. represented by counsel John Phillip Sweeney Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 59 Country Australia Submission date 10 Oct 2014 Date of decision 15 Nov 2016 JUTBCAT/C/59/D/633/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2195/en-US
Y. Sh. v. Russian Federation
Y. Sh. v. Russian Federation CCPR/C/128/D/2815/2016 Communication number s : 2815/2016 Author: Y. Sh. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 128 Country Russian Federation Submission date 15 Apr 2016 Date of decision 13 Mar 2020 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/128/D/2815/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2868/en-US
Y.W. v. Denmark
Y.W. v. Denmark CEDAW/C/60/D/51/2013 Communication number s : 051/2013 Author: Y.W. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 68 Country Denmark Submission date 02 Jan 2013 Date of decision 02 Mar 2015 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/60/D/51/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2052/en-US
Y v. Denmark
Y v. Denmark CCPR/C/136/D/2774/2016 Communication number s : 2774/2016 Author: Y Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 136 Country Denmark Submission date 28 Aug 2015 Date of decision 04 Nov 2022 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/136/D/2774/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3493/en-US
YUKHYMOVYCH v. Ukraine
YUKHYMOVYCH v. Ukraine UKR 17/03/2021 00:00:00 06/04/2021 20:53:01 Case Description: The case concerns the killing of the applicant s son in 1999 during an attempt to arrest him violation of substantive limb of Article 2 and ineffective investigation of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57099
Young-kwan Kim et al. v. Republic of Korea
Young kwan Kim et al. v. Republic of Korea CCPR/C/112/D/2179/2012 Communication number s : 2179/2012 Author: Young kwan Kim et al. represented by counsel Du Jin Oh Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 112 Country Republic of Korea Submission JUTBCCPR/C/112/D/2179/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1939/en-US
Young v. Australia
Young v. Australia CCPR/C/78/D/941/2000 Communication number s : 941/2000 Author: Edward Young Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 78 Country Australia Submission date 29 Jun 1999 Date of decision 06 Aug 2003 Comment: Committee members Ruth JUTBCCPR/C/78/D/941/2000https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1076/en-US
Yrusta v. Argentina
Yrusta v. Argentina CED/C/10/D/1/2013 Communication number s : 001/2013 Author: Estela Deolinda Yrusta Alejandra del Valle Yrusta Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 10 Country Argentina Submission date 11 Sep 2013 Date of decision 11 Mar 2016 JUTBCED/C/10/D/1/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2141/en-US
Z.A. AND OTHERS v. Russia
Z.A. AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 21/11/2019 00:00:00 28/11/2019 17:12:23 Case Description: Violation of the applicants four asylum seekers right to liberty on account of their staying for the periods between five months and over a year and nine months in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54281
Z.A.H. v. Canada
Z.A.H. v. Canada CAT/C/61/D/687/2015 Communication number s : 687/2015 Author: Z.A.H. represented by counsel Rajwinder S. Bhambi Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 61 Country Canada Submission date 22 Jun 2015 Date of decision 11 Aug JUTBCAT/C/61/D/687/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2284/en-US
Z.S. and A.S. v. Switzerland
Z.S. and A.S. v. Switzerland CRC/C/89/D/74/2019 Communication number s : 74/2019 Author: Z.S. and A.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 89 Country Switzerland Submission date 20 Sep 2018 Date of decision 10 Feb 2022 Comment: This document JUTBCRC/C/89/D/74/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3001/en-US