Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 2741 - 2760 of 3851
GREVIO’s (Baseline) Evaluation Report on legislative and other measures giving effect to the provisions of the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence (Istanbul Convention) TURKEY
GREVIO s Baseline Evaluation Report on legislative and other measures giving effect to the provisions of the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence Istanbul Convention TURKEY TUR a15 a22 a25 GREVIOGREVIO-Inf(2018)6_Turkey_Baseline_Evaluation_Report_enghttps://hudoc.grevio.coe.int/eng?i=GREVIO-Inf(2018)6_Turkey_Baseline_Evaluation_Report_eng
GREVIO’s Report on legislative and other measures giving effect to the provisions of the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence - MONACO
GREVIO s Report on legislative and other measures giving effect to the provisions of the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence MONACO MCO a1 a2 ges ste 2017 06 29 Published on .. Secretariat GREVIOGREVIO-Inf(2017)3_Monaco_Baseline_Evaluation_Report_enghttps://hudoc.grevio.coe.int/eng?i=GREVIO-Inf(2017)3_Monaco_Baseline_Evaluation_Report_eng
GRZEDA v. Poland
GRZEDA v. Poland POL 15/03/2022 00:00:00 17/03/2022 16:35:22 Case Description: The Reczkowicz group concerns infringements of the right to a tribunal established by law due to the fact that the judges of the various chambers in the Supreme Court SC EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-59933
Gabriel Osío Zamora v. Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of)
Gabriel Os o Zamora v. Venezuela Bolivarian Republic of CCPR/C/121/D/2203/2012 Communication number s : 2203/2012 Author: Gabriel Os o Zamora Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 121 Country Venezuela Bolivarian Republic of Submission date 25 JUTBCCPR/C/121/D/2203/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2349/en-US
Gallimore v. Jamaica
Gallimore v. Jamaica CCPR/C/66/D/680/1996 Communication number s : 680/1996 Author: Lancy Gallimore Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 66 Country Jamaica Submission date 29 Apr 1995 Date of decision 23 Jul 1999 Comment: Individual opinion JUTBCCPR/C/66/D/680/1996https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/790/en-US
Gauthier v. Canada
Gauthier v. Canada CCPR/C/65/D/633/1995 Communication number s : 633/1995 Author: Robert Gauthier Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 65 Country Canada Submission date 01 Jan 1995 Date of decision 07 Apr 1999 Comment: Exact date of submission JUTBCCPR/C/65/D/633/1995https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/768/en-US
Gedumbe v. Democratic Republic of the Congo
Gedumbe v. Democratic Republic of the Congo CCPR/C/75/D/641/1995 Communication number s : 641/1995 Author: Nyekuma Kopita Toro Gedumbe Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 75 Country Democratic Republic of the Congo Submission date 01 Jan 1995 JUTBCCPR/C/75/D/641/1995https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/975/en-US
Gemma Beasley v. Australia
Gemma Beasley v. Australia CRPD/C/15/D/11/2013 Communication number s : 011/2013 Author: Gemma Beasley Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 15 Country Australia Submission date 29 Apr 2013 Date of decision 01 Apr 2016 Comment: This document has JUTBCRPD/C/15/D/11/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2142/en-US
General Agreement on Privileges and Immunities of the Council of Europe (ETS No. 002)
General Agreement on Privileges and Immunities of the Council of Europe ETS No. 002 002 Paris 1949 09 02T00:00:00 Paris 1952 09 10T00:00:00 7 Ratifications. The Agreement concluded in accordance with the provisions of the Statute of the Council of Europe COEETS No. 002https://rm.coe.int/1680063729
Gordon v. Jamaica
Gordon v. Jamaica CCPR/C/46/D/237/1987 Communication number s : 237/1987 Author: Denroy Gordon Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 46 Country Jamaica Submission date 29 May 1987 Date of decision 05 Nov 1992 Comment: on 2 November 1987 and on JUTBCCPR/C/46/D/237/1987https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/444/en-US
Gorji-Dinka v. Cameroon
Gorji Dinka v. Cameroon CCPR/C/83/D/1134/2002 Communication number s : 1134/2002 Author: Fongum Gorji Dinka Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 83 Country Cameroon Submission date 14 Mar 2002 Date of decision 17 Mar 2005 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/83/D/1134/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1174/en-US
Government comments on the first report on Armenia
Government comments on the first report on Armenia ARM 2002 12 13 2003 07 08 APPENDIX ECRI wishes to point out that the analysis contained in its report on Armenia is dated 13 December 2002 and that any subsequent development is not taken into account. In ECRIARM-COM-II-2003-036-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=ARM-COM-II-2003-036-ENG
Government comments on the second report on the United Kingdom
Government comments on the second report on the United Kingdom GBR 2000 06 16 2001 04 03 The following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in United Kingdom. APPENDIX ECRI wishes to point out that the ECRIGBR-COM-II-2001-006-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=GBR-COM-II-2001-006-ENG
Government comments on the third report on Cyprus
Government comments on the third report on Cyprus CYP 2005 12 16 2006 05 16 APPENDIX The following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in Cyprus ECRI wishes to point out that the analysis contained in its ECRICYP-COM-III-2006-017-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=CYP-COM-III-2006-017-ENG
Government comments on the third report on Hungary
Government comments on the third report on Hungary HUN 2003 12 05 2004 06 08 APPENDIX The following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in Hungary 5 December 2003 In accordance with ECRI s country by ECRIHUN-COM-III-2004-025-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=HUN-COM-III-2004-025-ENG
Government comments on the third report on Italy
Government comments on the third report on Italy ITA 2005 12 16 2006 05 16 APPENDIX The following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in Italy ECRI wishes to point out that the analysis contained in its ECRIITA-COM-III-2006-019-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=ITA-COM-III-2006-019-ENG
Government comments on the third report on Portugal
Government comments on the third report on Portugal PRT 2006 06 30 2007 02 13 APPENDIX The following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in Portugal ECRI wishes to point out that the analysis contained in ECRIPRT-COM-III-2007-004-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=PRT-COM-III-2007-004-ENG
Gryb v. Belarus
Gryb v. Belarus CCPR/C/103/D/1316/2004 Communication number s : 1316/2004 Author: Mecheslav Gryb Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 103 Country Belarus Submission date 09 Jul 2004 Date of decision 26 Oct 2011 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/103/D/1316/2004https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1225/en-US
Guezout and Rakik v. Algeria
Guezout and Rakik v. Algeria CCPR/C/105/D/1753/2008 Communication number s : 1753/2008 Author: Yamina Guezout and her two sons Abderrahim and Bachir Rakik Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 105 Country Algeria Submission date 22 Nov 2007 Date JUTBCCPR/C/105/D/1753/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1653/en-US
Gurbanova and Muradhasilova v. Azerbaijan
Gurbanova and Muradhasilova v. Azerbaijan CCPR/C/131/D/2952/2017 Communication number s : 2952/2017 Author: Matanat Baliyar Gizi Gurbanova and Saadat Baliyar Gizi Muradhasilova Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 131 Country Azerbaijan JUTBCCPR/C/131/D/2952/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3249/en-US