Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 5401 - 5420 of 5597
W.E.O. v. Sweden
W.E.O. v. Sweden CCPR/C/129/D/2741/2016 Communication number s : 2741/2016 Author: W.E.O. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 129 Country Sweden Submission date 26 Feb 2016 Date of decision 23 Jul 2020 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/129/D/2741/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2844/en-US
W. G. D. v. Canada
W. G. D. v. Canada CAT/C/53/D/520/2012 Communication number s : 520/2012 Author: W. G. D. not represented by counsel Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 53 Country Canada Submission date 17 Aug 2012 Date of decision 26 Nov 2014 Comment: JUTBCAT/C/53/D/520/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2060/en-US
W.J.H. v. Netherlands
W.J.H. v. Netherlands CCPR/C/45/D/408/1990 Communication number s : 408/1990 Author: W.J.H. name deleted Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 45 Country Netherlands Submission date 15 Nov 1989 Date of decision 22 Jul 1992 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/45/D/408/1990https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/356/en-US
W.K. v. Canada
W.K. v. Canada CCPR/C/122/D/2292/2013 Communication number s : 2292/2013 Author: W.K. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 122 Country Canada Submission date 23 Oct 2013 Date of decision 27 Mar 2018 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/122/D/2292/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2442/en-US
W.M.C v. Denmark
W.M.C v. Denmark CRC/C/85/D/31/2017 Communication number s : 031/2017 Author: W.M.C Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 85 Online limited session Country Denmark Submission date 08 Aug 2017 Date of decision 28 Sep 2020 Comment: This document JUTBCRC/C/85/D/31/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2748/en-US
W.M.G. v. Canada
W.M.G. v. Canada CCPR/C/116/D/2060/2011 Communication number s : 2060/2011 Author: W.M.G. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 116 Country Canada Submission date 10 May 2011 Date of decision 11 Mar 2016 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/116/D/2060/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3538/en-US
WOS v. Poland
WOS v. Poland POL 08/09/2006 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:13:46 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Lack of judicial review of decisions taken by the Polish German Reconciliation Foundation on the claims to compensate victims of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-18441
Wackenheim v. France
Wackenheim v. France CCPR/C/75/D/854/1999 Communication number s : 854/1999 Author: Manuel Wackenheim Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 75 Country France Submission date 13 Nov 1996 Date of decision 15 Jul 2002 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/75/D/854/1999https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1010/en-US
Warda Osman Jasin v. Denmark
Warda Osman Jasin v. Denmark CCPR/C/114/D/2360/2014 Communication number s : 2360/2014 Author: Warda Osman Jasin Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 115 Country Denmark Submission date 17 Mar 2014 Date of decision 22 Jul 2015 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/114/D/2360/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2022/en-US
Warsame v. Canada
Warsame v. Canada CCPR/C/102/D/1959/2010 Communication number s : 1959/2010 Author: Jama Warsame Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 102 Country Canada Submission date 26 Jul 2010 Date of decision 21 Jul 2011 Comment: On 27 July 2010 the JUTBCCPR/C/102/D/1959/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1639/en-US
Wdowiak v. Poland
Wdowiak v. Poland CCPR/C/88/D/1446/2006 Communication number s : 1446/2006 Author: Barbara Wdowiak Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 88 Country Poland Submission date 08 Dec 2005 Date of decision 31 Oct 2006 Comment: Pursuant to rule JUTBCCPR/C/88/D/1446/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/998/en-US
Weismann Lanza and Lanza Perdomo v. Uruguay
Weismann Lanza and Lanza Perdomo v. Uruguay CCPR/C/9/D/8/1977 Communication number s : 008/1977 Author: Ana Maria Garcia Lanza de Netto on behalf of her aunt and uncle who later joined as submitting parties Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No JUTBCCPR/C/9/D/8/1977https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/385/en-US
Weiss v. Austria
Weiss v. Austria CCPR/C/77/D/1086/2002 Communication number s : 1086/2002 Author: Sholam Weiss Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 77 Country Austria Submission date 24 May 2002 Date of decision 03 Apr 2003 Comment: Under rule 86 of its rules JUTBCCPR/C/77/D/1086/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1048/en-US
Weiss v. Austria
Weiss v. Austria CCPR/C/106/D/1821/2008 Communication number s : 1821/2008 Author: Sholam Weiss Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 106 Country Austria Submission date 12 May 2008 Date of decision 24 Oct 2012 Comment: Pursuant to rule 91 of JUTBCCPR/C/106/D/1821/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1428/en-US
Westerman v. Netherlands
Westerman v. Netherlands CCPR/C/67/D/682/1996 Communication number s : 682/1996 Author: Paul Westerman Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 67 Country Netherlands Submission date 22 Nov 1995 Date of decision 03 Nov 1999 Comment: Individual JUTBCCPR/C/67/D/682/1996https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/838/en-US
Wight v. Madagascar
Wight v. Madagascar CCPR/C/24/D/115/1982 Communication number s : 115/1982 Author: John Wight Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 24 Country Madagascar Submission date 05 Jan 1982 Date of decision 01 Apr 1985 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/24/D/115/1982https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/343/en-US
Wilson v. Philippines
Wilson v. Philippines CCPR/C/79/D/868/1999 Communication number s : 868/1999 Author: Albert Wilson Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 79 Country Philippines Submission date 15 Jun 1999 Date of decision 30 Oct 2003 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/79/D/868/1999https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1088/en-US
Winata and Li v. Australia
Winata and Li v. Australia CCPR/C/72/D/930/2000 Communication number s : 930/2000 Author: Hendrick Winata and So Lan Li Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 72 Country Australia Submission date 11 May 2000 Date of decision 26 Jul 2001 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/72/D/930/2000https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/929/en-US
Wooden v. Mexico
Wooden v. Mexico CAT/C/71/D/759/2016 Communication number s : 759/2016 Author: Ronald James Wooden Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 71 Country Mexico Submission date 07 Jul 2016 Date of decision 23 Jul 2021 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/71/D/759/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3357/en-US
Working Group on Arbitrary Detention
Report to HRC A/HRC/13/30/Add.2 from 19 January 2009 to 23 January 2009 18 January 2010 Working Group on Arbitrary Detention Malta United Nations A/HRC/13/30/Add.2 Distr.: General General Assembly 18 January 2010 Original: English Human Rights Council UNSPA/HRC/13/30/Add.2https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f13%2f30%2fAdd.2&Lang=en