Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 5681 - 5700 of 6520
Second report on France
Second report on France FRA 1999 12 10 2000 06 27 CRI 2000 31 Second report on France Adopted on 10 December 1999 For further information about the work of the European Commission against Racism and Intolerance ECRI and about the other activities of the ECRIFRA-CbC-II-2000-031-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=FRA-CbC-II-2000-031-ENG
Second report on Norway
Second report on Norway NOR 1999 12 10 2000 06 27 CRI 2000 33 Second report on Norway Adopted on 10 December 1999 For further information about the work of the European Commission against Racism and Intolerance ECRI and about the other activities of the ECRINOR-CbC-II-2000-033-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=NOR-CbC-II-2000-033-ENG
Second report on Portugal
Second report on Portugal PRT 2002 03 20 2002 11 04 CRI 2002 33 Second report on Portugal Adopted on 20 March 2002 Strasbourg 4 November 2002 For further information about the work of the European Commission against Racism and Intolerance ECRI and about ECRIPRT-CbC-II-2002-033-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=PRT-CbC-II-2002-033-ENG
Second report on Sweden
Second report on Sweden SWE 2002 06 08 2003 04 15 CRI 2003 7 Second report on Sweden Adopted on 28 June 2002 Strasbourg 15 April 2003 For further information about the work of the European Commission against Racism and Intolerance ECRI and about the other ECRISWE-CbC-II-2003-007-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=SWE-CbC-II-2003-007-ENG
Second report on Ukraine
Second report on Ukraine UKR 2001 12 14 2002 07 23 CRI 2002 23 Second report on Ukraine Adopted on 14 December 2001 Strasbourg 23 July 2002 For further information about the work of the European Commission against Racism and Intolerance ECRI and about the ECRIUKR-CbC-II-2002-023-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=UKR-CbC-II-2002-023-ENG
Sekerko v. Belarus
Sekerko v. Belarus CCPR/C/130/D/2572/2015 Communication number s : 2572/2015 Author: Vladimir Sekerko Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 130 Country Belarus Submission date 21 Jul 2014 Date of decision 05 Nov 2020 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/130/D/2572/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3491/en-US
Sendic Antonaccio v. Uruguay
Sendic Antonaccio v. Uruguay CCPR/C/14/D/63/1979 Communication number s : 063/1979 Author: Violeta Setelich alleged victim s wife Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 14 Country Uruguay Submission date 28 Nov 1979 Date of decision 28 Oct 1981 JUTBCCPR/C/14/D/63/1979https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/325/en-US
Senegal’s human rights record to be reviewed by Universal Periodic Review
GENEVA 31 October 2018 Senegal s human rights record will be examined by the UN Human Rights Council s Universal Periodic Review UPR Working Group for the third time on Monday 5 November 2018 in a meeting that will be webcast live. Senegal is one of the UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2018/11/senegals-human-rights-record-be-reviewed-universal-periodic-review
Serbia’s human rights record to be examined by Universal Periodic Review
Non official UN languages: Serbian version PDF GENEVA 5 May 2023 Serbia s human rights record will be examined by the UN Human Rights Council s Universal Periodic Review UPR Working Group for the fourth time on Wednesday 10 May 2023 in a meeting that will UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/media-advisories/2023/05/serbias-human-rights-record-be-examined-universal-periodic-review
Serbia’s human rights record to be reviewed by Universal Periodic Review
GENEVA 19 January 2018 Serbia s human rights record will be examined by the UN Human Rights Council s Universal Periodic Review UPR Working Group for the third time on Wednesday 24 January 2018 in a meeting that will be webcast live. Serbia is one of the UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2018/07/serbias-human-rights-record-be-reviewed-universal-periodic-review
Seychelles’ human rights record to be examined by Universal Periodic Review
GENEVA 5 May 2021 Seychelles human rights record will be examined by the UN Human Rights Council s Universal Periodic Review UPR Working Group for the third time on Monday 10 May 2021 in a meeting that will be webcast live. Seychelles is one of the 14 UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2021/05/seychelles-human-rights-record-be-examined-universal-periodic-review
Sierra Leone’s human rights record to be examined by Universal Periodic Review
GENEVA 7 May 2021 Sierra Leone s human rights record will be examined by the UN Human Rights Council s Universal Periodic Review UPR Working Group for the third time on Wednesday 12 May 2021 in a meeting that will be webcast live. Sierra Leone is one of UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2021/05/sierra-leones-human-rights-record-be-examined-universal-periodic-review
Singapore’s human rights record to be examined by Universal Periodic Review
GENEVA 7 May 2021 Singapore s human rights record will be examined by the UN Human Rights Council s Universal Periodic Review UPR Working Group for the third time on Wednesday 12 May 2021 in a meeting that will be webcast live. Singapore is one of the 14 UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2021/05/singapores-human-rights-record-be-examined-universal-periodic-review
Singarasa v. Sri Lanka
Singarasa v. Sri Lanka CCPR/C/81/D/1033/2001 Communication number s : 1033/2001 Author: Nallaratnam Singarasa Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 81 Country Sri Lanka Submission date 19 Jun 2001 Date of decision 21 Jul 2004 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/81/D/1033/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1125/en-US
Singh v. France
Singh v. France CCPR/C/106/D/1852/2008 Communication number s : 1852/2008 Author: Bikramjit Singh Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 106 Country France Submission date 16 Dec 2008 Date of decision 01 Nov 2012 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/106/D/1852/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1655/en-US
Singh v. New Zealand
Singh v. New Zealand CCPR/C/72/D/791/1997 Communication number s : 791/1997 Author: Moti Singh Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 72 Country New Zealand Submission date 01 Dec 1996 Date of decision 12 Jul 2001 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/72/D/791/1997https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/921/en-US
Siobhán Whelan v. Ireland
Siobh n Whelan v. Ireland CCPR/C/119/D/2425/2014 Communication number s : 2425/2014 Author: Siobh n Whelan Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 119 Country Ireland Submission date 09 Apr 2014 Date of decision 17 Mar 2017 Comment: Individual JUTBCCPR/C/119/D/2425/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2376/en-US
Sister Immaculate Joseph et al. v. Sri Lanka
Sister Immaculate Joseph et al. v. Sri Lanka CCPR/C/85/D/1249/2004 Communication number s : 1249/2004 Author: Sister Immaculate Joseph and 80 Teaching Sisters of the Holy Cross of the Third Order of Saint Francis in Menzingen of Sri Lanka Type of JUTBCCPR/C/85/D/1249/2004https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1204/en-US
Sixth ECRI report on Cyprus
Sixth ECRI report on Cyprus CYP 2022 12 06 2023 03 07 CRI 2023 01 Sixth ECRI report on Cyprus Sixth monitoring cycle Adopted on 6 December 2022 Published on 7 March 2023 ECRI Secretariat Directorate General of Democracy and Human Dignity Council of Europe ECRICYP-CbC-VI-2023-01-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=CYP-CbC-VI-2023-01-ENG
Sixth General Report on GRETA's activities covering the period from 1 January to 31 December 2016
Sixth General Report on GRETA s activities covering the period from 1 January to 31 December 2016 2017 03 30 G R E T A Group of Experts on Action against Trafficking in Human Beings GRETA 2017 7 Sixth General Report on GRETA s activities covering the GRETAGEN--2017-7-ENGhttps://hudoc.greta.coe.int/eng?i=GEN--2017-7-ENG