Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 181 - 200 of 272
Convention on Cybercrime (ETS No. 185)
Convention on Cybercrime ETS No. 185 185 Budapest 2001 11 23T00:00:00 Treaty open for signature by the member States and the non member States which have participated in its elaboration and for accession by other non member States Budapest 2004 07 COEETS No. 185https://rm.coe.int/1680081561
D.G. et al. v. Philippines
D.G. et al. v. Philippines CCPR/C/128/D/2568/2015 Communication number s : 2568/2015 Author: D.G. et al. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 128 Country Philippines Submission date 25 Mar 2013 Date of decision 13 Mar 2020 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/128/D/2568/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2841/en-US
D.Z. v. Netherlands
D.Z. v. Netherlands CCPR/C/130/D/2918/2016 Communication number s : 2918/2016 Author: D.Z. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 130 Country Netherlands Submission date 23 Nov 2016 Date of decision 19 Oct 2020 Comment: Individual opinion of JUTBCCPR/C/130/D/2918/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3295/en-US
D.Č. v. Lithuania
D. . v. Lithuania CCPR/C/134/D/3327/2019 Communication number s : 3327/2019 Author: D. . Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 134 Country Lithuania Submission date 12 Sep 2018 Date of decision 24 Mar 2022 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/134/D/3327/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3147/en-US
Engo v. Cameroon
Engo v. Cameroon CCPR/C/96/D/1397/2005 Communication number s : 1397/2005 Author: Pierre D sir Engo Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 96 Country Cameroon Submission date 30 Mar 2005 Date of decision 22 Jul 2009 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/96/D/1397/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1527/en-US
Faurisson v. France
Faurisson v. France CCPR/C/58/D/550/1993 Communication number s : 550/1993 Author: Robert Faurisson Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 58 Country France Submission date 02 Jan 1993 Date of decision 08 Nov 1996 Comment: Pursuant to rule 85 of JUTBCCPR/C/58/D/550/1993https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/654/en-US
Fifth Opinion on Denmark
Fifth Opinion on Denmark DNK ACFC/OP/V 2019 003 2019 11 07 2020 01 29 ACFC/OP/V 2019 003 Published on 29/01/2020 Secretariat of the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities Council of Europe F 67075 Strasbourg Cedex FCNMACFC/OP/V(2019)003https://hudoc.fcnm.coe.int/eng?i=5th_OP_Denmark_en
Fifth Opinion on the United Kingdom
Fifth Opinion on the United Kingdom GBR ACFC/OP/V 2022 003 2022 12 08 2023 05 25 ACFC/OP/V 2022 003 Published on 23 May 2023 Secretariat of the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities Council of Europe F 67075 Strasbourg Cedex FCNMACFC/OP/V(2022)003https://hudoc.fcnm.coe.int/eng?i=5th_OP_UK_en
Follow-up report v. Algeria,Australia,Canada,Mexico,Morocco
Follow up report v. Algeria Australia Canada Mexico Morocco CAT/C/64/2 Communication number s : 327/2007 606/2014 500/2012 681/2015 477/2011 531/2012 682/2015 Author: Type of decision: Follow up report Session No 64 Country Algeria Australia Canada Mexico JUTBCAT/C/64/2https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3593/en-US
Follow-up report v. Argentina,Canada,Denmark,Mexico,Morocco,Switzerland
Follow up report v. Argentina Canada Denmark Mexico Morocco Switzerland CAT/C/66/3 Communication number s : 327/2007 606/2014 778/2016 500/2012 580/2014 742/2016 758/2016 811/2017 653/2015 477/2011 464/2011 Author: Type of decision: Follow up report JUTBCAT/C/66/3https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3591/en-US
Follow-up report v. Australia,Canada,Denmark,Mexico,Morocco,Sweden,Switzerland
Follow up report v. Australia Canada Denmark Mexico Morocco Sweden Switzerland CAT/C/65/3 Communication number s : 327/2007 606/2014 500/2012 742/2016 477/2011 750/2016 701/2015 634/2014 Author: Type of decision: Follow up report Session No 65 Country JUTBCAT/C/65/3https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3592/en-US
Follow-up report v. Burundi,Canada,Denmark,Finland,Kazakhstan,Morocco
Follow up report v. Burundi Canada Denmark Finland Kazakhstan Morocco CAT/C/60/4 Communication number s : 606/2014 580/2014 477/2011 634/2014 682/2015 490/2012 562/2013 441/2010 15/1994 503/2012 523/2012 497/2012 628/2014 327/2007 Author: Type of JUTBCAT/C/60/4https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3596/en-US
G.T. v. Canada
G.T. v. Canada CCPR/C/46/D/420/1990 Communication number s : 420/1990 Author: G.T. name deleted Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 46 Country Canada Submission date 22 Mar 1990 Date of decision 23 Oct 1992 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/46/D/420/1990https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/557/en-US
GREVIO’s (Baseline) Evaluation Report on legislative and other measures giving effect to the provisions of the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence (Istanbul Convention) NETHERLANDS
GREVIO s Baseline Evaluation Report on legislative and other measures giving effect to the provisions of the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence Istanbul Convention NETHERLANDS NLD a15 a23 GREVIOGREVIO-Inf(2019)19_Netherlands_Baseline_Evaluation_Report_enghttps://hudoc.grevio.coe.int/eng?i=GREVIO-Inf(2019)19_Netherlands_Baseline_Evaluation_Report_eng
GREVIO’s (Baseline) Evaluation Report on legislative and other measures giving effect to the provisions of the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence (Istanbul Convention) - ROMANIA
GREVIO s Baseline Evaluation Report on legislative and other measures giving effect to the provisions of the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence Istanbul Convention ROMANIA ROU a13 a20 a22 GREVIOGREVIO_Inf_2022_6_Romania_Baseline_Evaluation_Report_enghttps://hudoc.grevio.coe.int/eng?i=GREVIO_Inf_2022_6_Romania_Baseline_Evaluation_Report_eng
Gerritsen v. Netherlands
Gerritsen v. Netherlands CCPR/C/65/D/714/1996 Communication number s : 714/1996 Author: A. Gerritsen Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 65 Country Netherlands Submission date 01 Jan 1996 Date of decision 25 Mar 1999 Comment: Exact date JUTBCCPR/C/65/D/714/1996https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/770/en-US
Government comments on the third report on Denmark
Government comments on the third report on Denmark DNK 2005 12 16 2006 05 16 APPENDIX The following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in Denmark ECRI wishes to point out that the analysis contained in ECRIDNK-COM-III-2006-018-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=DNK-COM-III-2006-018-ENG
Independent Expert on the effect of economic reform policies and foreign debt on the full enjoyment of all human rights
Report to HRC E/CN.4/2003/10 from 15 May 2001 to 18 May 2001 23 October 2002 Independent Expert on the effect of economic reform policies and foreign debt on the full enjoyment of all human rights Bolivia E UNITED NATIONS Economic and Social Distr. UNSPE/CN.4/2003/10https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=E%2fCN.4%2f2003%2f10&Lang=en
Independent Expert on the situation of human rights in Somalia
Report to HRC E/CN.4/2000/110 from 14 November 1999 to 24 November 1999 26 January 2000 Independent Expert on the situation of human rights in Somalia Somalia UNITED NATIONS E Economic and Social Distr. Council GENERAL E/CN.4/2000/110 26 January 2000 UNSPE/CN.4/2000/110https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=E%2fCN.4%2f2000%2f110&Lang=en
Independent Expert on the situation of human rights in Somalia
Report to HRC E/CN.4/1999/103 from 31 October 1998 to 13 November 1998 18 February 1999 Independent Expert on the situation of human rights in Somalia Somalia UNITED NATIONS E Distr. Economic and Social GENERAL Council E/CN.4/1999/103 18 February 1999 UNSPE/CN.4/1999/103https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=E%2fCN.4%2f1999%2f103&Lang=en