Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 6901 - 6920 of 7208
Stolyar v. Russian Federation
Stolyar v. Russian Federation CCPR/C/88/D/996/2001 Communication number s : 996/2001 Author: Vadim Stolyar Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 88 Country Russian Federation Submission date 16 Feb 1999 Date of decision 31 Oct 2006 JUTBCCPR/C/88/D/996/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1311/en-US
Stow v. Portugal
Stow v. Portugal CCPR/C/92/D/1496/2006 Communication number s : 1496/2006 Author: Dilwyn Stow Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 92 Country Portugal Submission date 04 May 2006 Date of decision 01 Apr 2008 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/92/D/1496/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1416/en-US
Strakhov and Fayzullaev v. Uzbekistan
Strakhov and Fayzullaev v. Uzbekistan CCPR/C/90/D/1017/2001 1066/2002 Communication number s : 1066/2002 1017/2001 Author: S. Strakhova and Asad Fayzullaev Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 90 Country Uzbekistan Submission date 29 Sep 2002 JUTBCCPR/C/90/D/1017/2001&1066/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1405/en-US
Strakhova and Fayzullaev v. Uzbekistan
Strakhova and Fayzullaev v. Uzbekistan CCPR/C/90/D/1017/2001 1066/2002 Communication number s : 1066/2002 1017/2001 Author: Ms. S. Strakhova mother of Mr. Maxim Strakhov and Mr. Asad Fayzullaev on behalf of his son Nigmat Type of decision: Decision on JUTBCCPR/C/90/D/1017/2001,1066/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3214/en-US
Subero Beisti v. Spain
Subero Beisti v. Spain CCPR/C/92/D/1375/2005 Communication number s : 1375/2005 Author: Jos Luis Subero Beisti Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 92 Country Spain Submission date 07 Jan 2003 Date of decision 01 Apr 2008 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/92/D/1375/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1419/en-US
Szijjarto v. Hungary
Szijjarto v. Hungary CEDAW/C/36/D/4/2004 Communication number s : 004/2004 Author: Andrea Szijjarto Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 36 Country Hungary Submission date 12 Feb 2004 Date of decision 14 Aug 2006 Comment: Under rule 60 1 c of JUTBCEDAW/C/36/D/4/2004https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1716/en-US
T. A. v. Sweden
T. A. v. Sweden CAT/C/34/D/226/2003 Communication number s : 226/2003 Author: T. A. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 34 Country Sweden Submission date 16 Jan 2003 Date of decision 06 May 2005 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/34/D/226/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/138/en-US
T.A. v. Switzerland
T.A. v. Switzerland CAT/C/73/D/914/2019 Communication number s : 914/2019 Author: T.A. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 73 Country Switzerland Submission date 13 Feb 2019 Date of decision 28 Apr 2022 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/73/D/914/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3052/en-US
T.N. v. Denmark
T.N. v. Denmark CEDAW/C/59/D/37/2012 Communication number s : 037/2012 Author: T.N. represented by counsel Tyge Trier Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 59 Country Denmark Submission date 19 Sep 2011 Date of decision 03 Nov 2014 JUTBCEDAW/C/59/D/37/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1880/en-US
T.S. v. Netherlands
T.S. v. Netherlands CAT/C/71/D/896/2018 Communication number s : 896/2018 Author: T.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 71 Country Netherlands Submission date 02 Nov 2018 Date of decision 19 Jul 2021 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/71/D/896/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3374/en-US
T.S. v. Russian Federation
T.S. v. Russian Federation CEDAW/C/66/D/69/2014 Communication number s : 69/2014 Author: T.S. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 66 Country Russian Federation Submission date 07 May 2014 Date of decision 28 Feb 2017 Comment: This JUTBCEDAW/C/66/D/69/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3448/en-US
T v. New Zealand
T v. New Zealand CCPR/C/125/D/2684/2015 Communication number s : 2684/2015 Author: T Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 125 Country New Zealand Submission date 02 Jun 2015 Date of decision 29 Mar 2019 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/125/D/2684/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3316/en-US
TASKIN AND OTHERS v. Turkey
TASKIN AND OTHERS v. Turkey TUR 30/03/2005 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:08:36 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice / Protection of private life: Failure to protect the applicants from private activities producing a dangerous effects EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37302
TEKIN YILDIZ v. Turkey
TEKIN YILDIZ v. Turkey TUR 10/02/2006 00:00:00 09/11/2016 14:32:01 Case Description: The present group of cases concerns possible or continued detention of prisoners suffering from the physical and mental effects of malnutrition which in certain instances EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-34700
TICU v. Romania
TICU v. Romania ROU 01/01/2014 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: These cases concern the ill treatment suffered by the applicants in various prisons due to the inadequate management of their severe psychiatric conditions from 2003 to 2019. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13270
TIM HENRIK BRUUN HANSEN v. Denmark
TIM HENRIK BRUUN HANSEN v. Denmark DNK 09/10/2019 00:00:00 23/10/2019 11:45:51 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Authorities failure to obtain fresh evidence by an external expert opinion when reviewing the necessity of continuing safe EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54073
TRANSKOP AD BITOLA v. North Macedonia
TRANSKOP AD BITOLA v. North Macedonia MKD 01/04/2021 00:00:00 06/04/2021 20:53:01 Case Description: Functioning of justice: Unfair confiscation proceedings on account of the failure of criminal courts to hold an oral hearing and non respect of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57109
TRUFIN v. Romania
TRUFIN v. Romania ROU 20/01/2010 00:00:00 06/11/2016 16:19:47 Case Description: Right to life: Ineffectiveness of criminal investigations into the deaths of the applicants relatives on account in particular of their length and/or failure to elucidate the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17532
TUNIKOVA AND OTHERS v. Russia
TUNIKOVA AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 14/03/2022 00:00:00 31/03/2022 18:11:41 Case Description: The applicant women in this group of cases were victims of different forms of domestic violence from their male partners/ex partners including repeated assaults EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-60049
TUNISIA : VISIT REPORT OF THE SUBCOMMITTEE
TUNISIA : VISIT REPORT OF THE SUBCOMMITTEE CAT/OP/TUN/2 NULL 2017 08 11T00:00:00 SPT United Nations CAT/OP/TUN/2 Optional Protocol to the Distr.: General Convention against Torture 11 August 2017 English and Other Cruel Inhuman Original: French Arabic UHRICAT/OP/TUN/2https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/ae24fba5-17d3-445a-a437-845ea3f9d2f2