Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1101 - 1120 of 1452
Meïssa Wade v. Senegal
Me ssa Wade v. Senegal CCPR/C/124/D/2783/2016 Communication number s : 2783/2016 Author: Karim Me ssa Wade Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 124 Country Senegal Submission date 31 May 2016 Date of decision 23 Oct 2018 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/124/D/2783/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3325/en-US
Mennen v. Netherlands
Mennen v. Netherlands CCPR/C/99/D/1797/2008 Communication number s : 1797/2008 Author: Thomas Wilhelmus Henricus Mennen Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 99 Country Netherlands Submission date 08 May 2008 Date of decision 27 Jul 2010 JUTBCCPR/C/99/D/1797/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1524/en-US
Michael Lockrey v. Australia
Michael Lockrey v. Australia CRPD/C/15/D/13/2013 Communication number s : 013/2013 Author: Michael Lockrey Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 15 Country Australia Submission date 08 Apr 2013 Date of decision 01 Apr 2016 Comment: This document JUTBCRPD/C/15/D/13/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2143/en-US
NAVOLOACA v. the Republic of Moldova
NAVOLOACA v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 16/03/2009 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:38:31 Case Description: Functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings on account of the quashing of the applicant s acquittal and his conviction by the Supreme Court of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6764
NEDESCU v. Romania
NEDESCU v. Romania ROU 16/04/2018 00:00:00 15/03/2019 16:06:37 Case Description: The case concerns the continuing impossibility for the applicants to recover their frozen embryos seized by the prosecuting authorities in 2009 in a criminal investigation EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49399
Natalya Pinchuk v. Belarus
Natalya Pinchuk v. Belarus CCPR/C/112/D/2165/2012 Communication number s : 2165/2012 Author: Natalya Pinchuk represented by counsel Antoine Bernard Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 112 Country Belarus Submission date 12 Apr 2012 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/112/D/2165/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1938/en-US
Obah Hussein Ahmed v. Denmark
Obah Hussein Ahmed v. Denmark CCPR/C/117/D/2379/2014 Communication number s : 2379/2014 Author: Obah Hussein Ahmed Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 117 Country Denmark Submission date 11 Apr 2014 Date of decision 07 Jul 2016 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/117/D/2379/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2147/en-US
Oliveró Capellades v. Spain
Oliver Capellades v. Spain CCPR/C/87/D/1211/2003 Communication number s : 1211/2003 Author: Luis Oliver Capellades Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 87 Country Spain Submission date 18 Apr 2002 Date of decision 11 Jul 2006 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/87/D/1211/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1281/en-US
P. AND S. v. Poland
P. AND S. v. Poland POL 30/01/2013 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: These three cases concern the lack of effective access to lawful abortion in Poland. The Tysi c and R.R. cases concern the lack of effective procedural mechanisms to enable EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20614
PAKETOVA AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria
PAKETOVA AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria BGR 11/01/2023 00:00:00 03/02/2023 17:20:59 Case Description: The case concerned the impossibility for the applicants fifty one Bulgarian nationals of Roma 1 ethnic origin to enjoy their private and family life and their EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-62534
POLITICAL PARTY "PATRIA" AND OTHERS v. the Republic of Moldova
POLITICAL PARTY PATRIA AND OTHERS v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 04/11/2020 00:00:00 03/12/2020 16:50:01 Case Description: Electoral rights: Arbitrary interference with the applicants and the applicant party s electoral rights as a result of the latter s EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56335
POPOV v. the Republic of Moldova (no. 2)
POPOV v. the Republic of Moldova no. 2 MDA 06/03/2006 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:38:31 Case Description: This group of cases concern the violation of the applicants right to a fair hearing on account of the quashing of domestic final judgments between 2004 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6810
Protocol No. 14 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, amending the control system of the Convention (CETS No. 194) (*)
Protocol No. 14 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms amending the control system of the Convention CETS No. 194 194 Strasbourg 2004 05 13T00:00:00 Since its entry into force this Protocol forms an integrant part of COECETS No. 194https://rm.coe.int/1680083711
Protocol No. 7 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (ETS No. 117)
Protocol No. 7 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms ETS No. 117 117 Strasbourg 1984 11 22T00:00:00 Treaty open for signature by the member States signatories to Treaty ETS 5 Strasbourg 1988 11 01T00:00:00 7 COEETS No. 117https://rm.coe.int/168007a082
Protocol to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (ETS No. 009)
Protocol to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms ETS No. 009 009 Paris 1952 03 20T00:00:00 Treaty open for signature by the member States signatories to Treaty ETS 5 Paris 1954 05 18T00:00:00 10 Ratifications. The COEETS No. 009https://rm.coe.int/168006377c
R.A.A. and Z. M. v. Denmark
R.A.A. and Z. M. v. Denmark CCPR/C/118/D/2608/2015 Communication number s : 2608/2015 Author: R.A.A. and Z. M. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 118 Country Denmark Submission date 08 May 2015 Date of decision 28 Oct 2016 Comment: Individual JUTBCCPR/C/118/D/2608/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2181/en-US
R.I.H. et al. v. Denmark
R.I.H. et al. v. Denmark CCPR/C/120/D/2640/2015 Communication number s : 2640/2015 Author: R.I.H. et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 120 Country Denmark Submission date 06 Aug 2015 Date of decision 13 Jul 2017 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/120/D/2640/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2225/en-US
R.R. AND OTHERS v. Hungary
R.R. AND OTHERS v. Hungary HUN 29/04/2013 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:32:51 Case Description: Right to life: Authorities failure to adequately protect the right to life of members of a witness protection scheme on account of their exclusion from it without any EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10535
R.R. AND R.D. v. Slovakia
R.R. AND R.D. v. Slovakia SVK 01/12/2020 00:00:00 15/12/2020 14:13:50 Case Description: This group of cases concerns various violations related to excessive use of force by the police failure to protect physical well being of persons in police custody EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56501
R.R. v. Poland
R.R. v. Poland POL 28/11/2011 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: These three cases concern the lack of effective access to lawful abortion in Poland. The Tysi c and R.R. cases concern the lack of effective procedural mechanisms to enable the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20596