Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1361 - 1366 of 1366
Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self-determination
Report to HRC A/HRC/15/25/Add.3 from 20 July 2009 to 24 July 2009 15 June 2010 Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self determination United States of America UNSPA/HRC/15/25/Add.3https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f15%2f25%2fAdd.3&Lang=en
Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self-determination
Report to HRC A/HRC/30/34/Add.1 from 7 October 2014 to 10 October 2014 17 August 2015 Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self determination C te d Ivoire United UNSPA/HRC/30/34/Add.1https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f30%2f34%2fAdd.1&Lang=en
Wuyts v. Netherlands
Wuyts v. Netherlands CCPR/C/69/D/785/1997 Communication number s : 785/1997 Author: Alexandre Wuyts Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 69 Country Netherlands Submission date 24 Jun 1996 Date of decision 17 Jul 2000 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/69/D/785/1997https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/884/en-US
Z.U.B.S. v. Australia
Z.U.B.S. v. Australia CERD/C/55/D/6/1995 Communication number s : 6/1995 Author: Z.U.B.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 55 Country Australia Submission date 17 Jan 1995 Date of decision 26 Dec 1999 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCERD/C/55/D/6/1995https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3024/en-US
Z. v. Australia
Z. v. Australia CCPR/C/111/D/2049/2011 Communication number s : 2049/2011 Author: Z. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 111 Country Australia Submission date 15 Apr 2011 Date of decision 18 Jul 2014 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/111/D/2049/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1866/en-US
fourth EVALUATION round Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament, judges and prosecutors SECOND COMPLIANCE REPORT LUXEMBOURG
fourth EVALUATION round Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament judges and prosecutors SECOND COMPLIANCE REPORT LUXEMBOURG LUX 2017 10 18 2017 10 20 I. INTRODUCTION The Second Compliance Report assesses the measures taken by the GRECOGrecoRC4-2017-17-Final-eng-Luxembourg-2ndRC-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=GrecoRC4-2017-17-Final-eng-Luxembourg-2ndRC-PUBLIC