Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 20
CASE OF AZER AHMADOV v. AZERBAIJAN
CASE OF AZER AHMADOV v. AZERBAIJAN 3409/10 HAJILI R. NAMAZLI F. SADIGOV E. AZE 7/22/2021 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 1 Respect for correspondence Respect for private life Non pecuniary damage ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0722JUD000340910https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-211101
CASE OF BĂRBULESCU v. ROMANIA
CASE OF B RBULESCU v. ROMANIA 61496/08 COSTINESCU D. JUVERDEANU O. ROU 1/12/2016 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible No violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 Positive obligations Article 8 1 Respect for ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0112JUD006149608https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-159906
CASE OF BERNH LARSEN HOLDING AS AND OTHERS v. NORWAY
CASE OF BERNH LARSEN HOLDING AS AND OTHERS v. NORWAY 24117/08 HATLAND T. NOR 3/14/2013 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 1 Respect for correspondence Respect for home Section 3 5 1 3 6 1 and sub ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0314JUD002411708https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-117133
CASE OF BYKOV v. RUSSIA
CASE OF BYKOV v. RUSSIA 4378/02 KRAUSS D. PASTILLE J. C. PADVA G. RUS 3/10/2009 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 5 3 Violation of Art. 8 No violation of Art. 6 Pecuniary damage claim dismissed Non pecuniary damage award Section 8 of the Operational Search ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0310JUD000437802https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-91704
CASE OF CAMPBELL AND FELL v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF CAMPBELL AND FELL v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 7819/77 7878/77 N/A GBR 6/28/1984 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection partially allowed non exhaustion of domestic remedies Violation of Art. 6 1 Violation of Art. 6 3 b Violation of Art. 6 3 c Violation of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1984:0628JUD000781977https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57456
CASE OF CENTRUM FÖR RÄTTVISA v. SWEDEN
CASE OF CENTRUM F R R TTVISA v. SWEDEN 35252/08 BERGMAN F. SWE 6/19/2018 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed Art. 34 Individual applications Art. 34 Victim No violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0619JUD003525208https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-183863
CASE OF CYPRUS v. TURKEY
CASE OF CYPRUS v. TURKEY 25781/94 N/A TUR 5/10/2001 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 2 Right to life Article 2 1 Life Substantive aspect Violation of Article 2 Right to life Article 2 1 Effective investigation Procedural aspect No violation of Article ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0510JUD002578194https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-59454
CASE OF DE WILDE, OOMS AND VERSYP v. BELGIUM
CASE OF DE WILDE OOMS AND VERSYP v. BELGIUM 2832/66 2835/66 2899/66 N/A BEL 6/18/1971 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection partially allowed non exhaustion of domestic remedies Violation of Art. 5 4 No violation of Art. 5 1 No violation of Art. 4 No ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1971:0618JUD000283266https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57606
CASE OF EKIMDZHIEV AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA
CASE OF EKIMDZHIEV AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA 70078/12 STEFANOVA S. CHERNICHERSKA G. EKIMDZHIEVA T. DOKOVA KOSTADINOVA M. KASHAMOV A.A KASHAMOV A.E. BGR 1/11/2022 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed Art. 34 Individual applications ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0111JUD007007812https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-214673
CASE OF ENEA v. ITALY
CASE OF ENEA v. ITALY 74912/01 ESPOSITO M. ITA 9/17/2009 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible No violation of Art. 3 substantive aspect Violation of Art. 6 1 No violation of Art. 6 1 Violation of Art. 8 Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0917JUD007491201https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-94072
CASE OF HORYCH v. POLAND
CASE OF HORYCH v. POLAND 13621/08 ZNAMIEC J. POL 4/17/2012 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Degrading treatment Inhuman punishment Substantive aspect Violation of Article 8 Right to respect for ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0417JUD001362108https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-110440
CASE OF KLAUS MÜLLER v. GERMANY
CASE OF KLAUS M LLER v. GERMANY 24173/18 DEU 11/19/2020 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 1 Respect for correspondence Respect for private life Articles 53 1 no. 3 and 2 and 70 1 of the Code of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1119JUD002417318https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-206165
CASE OF KOPP v. SWITZERLAND
CASE OF KOPP v. SWITZERLAND 23224/94 N/A CHE 3/25/1998 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection rejected non exhaustion of domestic remedies Violation of Art. 8 Not necessary to examine Art. 13 Pecuniary damage claim dismissed Non pecuniary damage finding of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0325JUD002322494https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58144
CASE OF LABITA v. ITALY
CASE OF LABITA v. ITALY 26772/95 N/A ITA 4/6/2000 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 3 with regard to alleged ill treatment Violation of Art. 3 with regard to lack of effective investigation No violation of Art. 3 with regard to conditions of transfer ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0406JUD002677295https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58559
CASE OF MARGARETA AND ROGER ANDERSSON v. SWEDEN
CASE OF MARGARETA AND ROGER ANDERSSON v. SWEDEN 12963/87 N/A SWE 2/25/1992 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 1 Respect for correspondence Respect for family life No violation of Article 13 Right to ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1992:0225JUD001296387https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57748
CASE OF MICHALAK v. SLOVAKIA
CASE OF MICHALAK v. SLOVAKIA 30157/03 TOMAN R. SVK 2/8/2011 12:00:00 AM Violations of Art. 5 4 Violation of Art. 5 5 Violation of Art. 13 8 Remainder inadmissible Pecuniary damage claim dismissed Non pecuniary damage award State Liability Act 1969 Section ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0208JUD003015703https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-103251
CASE OF PETRI SALLINEN AND OTHERS v. FINLAND
CASE OF PETRI SALLINEN AND OTHERS v. FINLAND 50882/99 FREDMAN MARKKU FIN 9/27/2005 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 8 Not necessary to examine under Art. 6 Not necessary to examine under Art. 13 Non pecuniary damage financial award one applicant Finding of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0927JUD005088299https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-70283
CASE OF PIECHOWICZ v. POLAND
CASE OF PIECHOWICZ v. POLAND 20071/07 WIECLAW W. POL 4/17/2012 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Degrading treatment Inhuman treatment Substantive aspect Violation of Article 5 Right to liberty and ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0417JUD002007107https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-110499
CASE OF SÄRGAVA v. ESTONIA
CASE OF S RGAVA v. ESTONIA 698/19 LINDMA T. EST 11/16/2021 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 1 Respect for correspondence Non pecuniary damage claim dismissed Article 41 Non pecuniary damage Just ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1116JUD000069819https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-213208
CASE OF SZABÓ AND VISSY v. HUNGARY
CASE OF SZAB AND VISSY v. HUNGARY 37138/14 MAJTENYI L. HUN 1/12/2016 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 1 Respect for correspondence Respect for home Respect for private life No violation of Article ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0112JUD003713814https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-160020