Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 112
4. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 4. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights New York 16 December 1966 Entry into force : 23 March 1976 in accordance with article 49 for all provisions except those of article 41 UNIV-4https://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-4&chapter=4&clang=_en
9. Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 9. Convention against Torture and Other Cruel Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment New York 10 December 1984 Entry into force : 26 June 1987 in accordance with article 27 1 . 1 UNIV-9https://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-9&chapter=4&clang=_en
Achille Benoit Zogo Andela v. Cameroon
Achille Benoit Zogo Andela v. Cameroon CCPR/C/121/D/2764/2016 Communication number s : 2764/2016 Author: Cyrille Gervais Moutono Zogo Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 121 Country Cameroon Submission date 28 Oct 2014 Date of decision 08 Nov JUTBCCPR/C/121/D/2764/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2360/en-US
B.L. (represented by Balmain for Refugees) v. Australia
B.L. represented by Balmain for Refugees v. Australia CCPR/C/112/D/2053/2011 Communication number s : 2053/2011 Author: B.L. represented by Balmain for Refugees Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 112 Country Australia Submission date 15 Apr JUTBCCPR/C/112/D/2053/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1905/en-US
CASE OF B AND C v. SWITZERLAND
CASE OF B AND C v. SWITZERLAND 889/19 43987/16 SURBER B. CHE 11/17/2020 12:00:00 AM Struck out of the list Art. 37 Striking out applications general Art. 37 1 Striking out applications Art. 37 1 c Continued examination not justified Violation of Article 3 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1117JUD000088919https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-206153
CASE OF DIALLO v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC
CASE OF DIALLO v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC 20493/07 VETROVSKY J. CZE 6/23/2011 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 13 3 Remainder inadmissible Non pecuniary damage award Just satisfaction reserved 2nd applicant Aliens Act 350 620 444 110 23 183 177 14 128 400 609 3 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0623JUD002049307https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-105281
CASE OF GEORGIA v. RUSSIA (II)
CASE OF GEORGIA v. RUSSIA II 38263/08 RUS 1/21/2021 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objections dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Ratione loci ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0121JUD003826308https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-207757
CASE OF HRVATSKI LIJEČNIČKI SINDIKAT v. CROATIA
CASE OF HRVATSKI LIJE NI KI SINDIKAT v. CROATIA 36701/09 POSAVEC S. HRV 11/27/2014 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed Article 34 Locus standi Violation of Article 11 Freedom of assembly and association Article 11 1 Freedom of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1127JUD003670109https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-148181
CASE OF LASHMANKIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
CASE OF LASHMANKIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA 57818/09 51169/10 4618/11 19700/11 31040/11 47609/11 55306/11 59410/11 7189/12 16128/12 16134/12 20273/12 51540/12 64243/12 37038/13 SHUKHARDIN V. BARTENEV D. ISSAEVA M. TEREKHOV K. RUS 2/7/2017 12:00:00 AM ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0207JUD005781809https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-170857
CASE OF M.E. v. SWEDEN
CASE OF M.E. v. SWEDEN 71398/12 PETERSSON S. A. SWE 6/26/2014 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Expulsion Conditional Libya Articles 407 and 408 of the Libyan Penal Code 350 620 14 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0626JUD007139812https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-145018
CASE OF NAÏT-LIMAN v. SWITZERLAND
CASE OF NA T LIMAN v. SWITZERLAND 51357/07 TRIAL INTERNATIONAL CHE 3/15/2018 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 6 Right to a fair trial Article 6 Civil proceedings Article 6 1 Access to court Article 41 of the Swiss Code of Obligations Section 3 of the ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0315JUD005135707https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-181789
CASE OF VASSIS AND OTHERS v. FRANCE [Extracts]
CASE OF VASSIS AND OTHERS v. FRANCE Extracts 62736/09 SPINOSI P. FRA 6/27/2013 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 5 Right to liberty and security Article 5 3 Brought promptly before judge or other officer Non pecuniary damage award ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0627JUD006273609https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-122306
CASE OF ĆWIK v. POLAND
CASE OF WIK v. POLAND 31454/10 ILASZ L. POL 11/5/2020 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 6 Right to a fair trial Article 6 Criminal proceedings Article 6 1 Fair hearing Pecuniary damage claim dismissed Article 41 Pecuniary damage Just satisfaction Non ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1105JUD003145410https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-205536
Doukoure et al. v. France
Doukoure et al. v. France CCPR/C/68/D/756/1997 Communication number s : 756/1997 Author: Mathia Doukoure Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 68 Country France Submission date 17 May 1996 Date of decision 29 Mar 2000 Comment: Pursuant to JUTBCCPR/C/68/D/756/1997https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/890/en-US
GREVIO’s (Baseline) Evaluation Report on legislative and other measures giving effect to the provisions of the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence (Istanbul Convention) ITALY
GREVIO s Baseline Evaluation Report on legislative and other measures giving effect to the provisions of the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence Istanbul Convention ITALY ITA exe 2019 11 15 GREVIOGREVIO-Inf(2019)18_Italy_Baseline_Evaluation_Report_enghttps://hudoc.grevio.coe.int/eng?i=GREVIO-Inf(2019)18_Italy_Baseline_Evaluation_Report_eng
Government comments on the third report on Malta
Government comments on the third report on Malta MLT 2007 12 14 2008 04 29 APPENDIX The following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in Malta ECRI wishes to point out that the analysis contained in its ECRIMLT-COM-III-2008-022-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=MLT-COM-III-2008-022-ENG
Guengueng et al. v. Senegal
Guengueng et al. v. Senegal CAT/C/36/D/181/2001 Communication number s : 181/2001 Author: Suleymane Guengueng et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 36 Country Senegal Submission date 18 Apr 2001 Date of decision 17 May 2006 Comment: In JUTBCAT/C/36/D/181/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/116/en-US
H.B.A. et al. v. Canada
H.B.A. et al. v. Canada CAT/C/56/D/536/2013 Communication number s : 536/2013 Author: H.B.A. et al. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 56 Country Canada Submission date 14 Nov 2012 Date of decision 02 Dec 2015 Comment: This document has JUTBCAT/C/56/D/536/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2070/en-US
H. S. T. v. Norway
H. S. T. v. Norway CAT/C/37/D/288/2006 Communication number s : 288/2006 Author: H. S. T. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 37 Country Norway Submission date 09 Jan 2006 Date of decision 16 Nov 2006 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/37/D/288/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/104/en-US
Human Rights Council Adopts Universal Periodic Review Outcomes of Oman, Austria, and Rwanda
8 July 2021 The Human Rights Council this afternoon adopted the Universal Periodic Review outcomes of Oman Austria and Rwanda. Speaking on the Universal Periodic Review outcome of Oman were Nepal Pakistan Philippines Qatar Russian Federation Saudi Arabia UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2021/07/human-rights-council-adopts-universal-periodic-review-outcomes-oman-austria