Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 5141 - 5160 of 5180
Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self-determination
Report to HRC A/HRC/42/42/Add.2 from 21 June 2018 to 29 June 2018 26 July 2019 Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self determination Austria United Nations UNSPA/HRC/42/42/Add.2https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f42%2f42%2fAdd.2&Lang=en
Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self-determination
Report to HRC A/HRC/4/42/Add.1 from 21 August 2006 to 25 August 2006 20 February 2007 Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self determination Honduras UNITED UNSPA/HRC/4/42/Add.1https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f4%2f42%2fAdd.1&Lang=en
X. J. v. Netherlands
X. J. v. Netherlands CCPR/C/105/D/1840/2008 Communication number s : 1840/2008 Author: X. J. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 105 Country Netherlands Submission date 08 Sep 2008 Date of decision 23 Jul 2012 Comment: Pursuant to rule JUTBCCPR/C/105/D/1840/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1249/en-US
X.Q.H. v. New Zealand
X.Q.H. v. New Zealand CCPR/C/110/D/2197/2012 Communication number s : 2197/2012 Author: X.Q.H. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 110 Country New Zealand Submission date 22 Mar 2012 Date of decision 25 Mar 2014 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/110/D/2197/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1821/en-US
X.Q.L. v. Australia
X.Q.L. v. Australia CAT/C/52/D/455/2011 Communication number s : 455/2011 Author: X.Q.L. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 52 Country Australia Submission date 03 Mar 2011 Date of decision 02 May 2014 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/52/D/455/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1828/en-US
X. v. Afghanistan,Sweden
X. v. Afghanistan Sweden CCPR/C/103/D/1833/2008 Communication number s : 1833/2008 Author: X. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 103 Country Afghanistan Sweden Submission date 26 Nov 2008 Date of decision 01 Nov 2011 Comment: Pursuant to rule JUTBCCPR/C/103/D/1833/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1390/en-US
X v. Australia
X v. Australia CAT/C/71/D/789/2016 Communication number s : 789/2016 Author: X Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 71 Country Australia Submission date 21 Oct 2016 Date of decision 27 Jul 2021 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCAT/C/71/D/789/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3356/en-US
X. v. Czech Republic v. Czech Republic
X. v. Czech Republic v. Czech Republic CCPR/C/113/D/1961/2010 Communication number s : 1961/2010 Author: X Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 113 Country Czech Republic Submission date 04 Jan 2010 Date of decision 02 Apr 2015 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/113/D/1961/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1952/en-US
X v. Norway
X v. Norway CCPR/C/115/D/2474/2014 Communication number s : 2474/2014 Author: X Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 115 Country Norway Submission date 28 Oct 2014 Date of decision 05 Nov 2015 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCCPR/C/115/D/2474/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2018/en-US
X v. Switzerland
X v. Switzerland CAT/C/67/D/775/2016 Communication number s : 775/2016 Author: X represented by counsel Roman Schuler Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 67 Country Switzerland Submission date 24 Oct 2016 Date of decision 05 Aug 2019 Comment: JUTBCAT/C/67/D/775/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2625/en-US
X. v. Timor-Leste
X. v. Timor Leste CEDAW/C/69/D/88/2015 Communication number s : 088/2015 Author: X. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 69 Country Timor Leste Submission date 16 Feb 2015 Date of decision 26 Feb 2018 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/69/D/88/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2638/en-US
X. v. Timor-Leste
X. v. Timor Leste CEDAW/C/69/D/88/2015 Communication number s : 088/2015 Author: X. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 69 Country Timor Leste Submission date Date of decision 26 Feb 2018 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCEDAW/C/69/D/88/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2428/en-US
Y.A.A. and F.H.M. v. Denmark
Y.A.A. and F.H.M. v. Denmark CCPR/C/119/D/2681/2015 Communication number s : 2681/2015 Author: Y.A.A. and F.H.M. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 119 Country Denmark Submission date 11 Nov 2015 Date of decision 10 Mar 2017 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/119/D/2681/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2293/en-US
Y.H.A. v. Australia
Y.H.A. v. Australia CAT/C/27/D/162/2000 Communication number s : 162/2000 Author: Y.H.A. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 27 Country Australia Submission date 14 Apr 2000 Date of decision 23 Nov 2001 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/27/D/162/2000https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/195/en-US
Y v. Canada
Y v. Canada CCPR/C/116/D/2314/2013 Communication number s : 2314/2013 Author: Y Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 116 Country Canada Submission date 06 Dec 2013 Date of decision 22 Mar 2016 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCCPR/C/116/D/2314/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2177/en-US
Y v. Canada
Y v. Canada CCPR/C/116/D/2314/2013 Communication number s : 2314/2013 Author: Y Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 116 Country Canada Submission date Date of decision Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive issues: arbitrary JUTBCCPR/C/116/D/2314/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2133/en-US
Y. v. Switzerland
Y. v. Switzerland CAT/C/50/D/431/2010 Communication number s : 431/2010 Author: Y. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 50 Country Switzerland Submission date 31 Aug 2010 Date of decision 21 May 2013 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/50/D/431/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/10/en-US
Yakupova v. Uzbekistan
Yakupova v. Uzbekistan CCPR/C/92/D/1205/2003 Communication number s : 1205/2003 Author: Zinaida Yakupova Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 92 Country Uzbekistan Submission date 08 Oct 2003 Date of decision 04 Apr 2008 Comment: Under rule 92 JUTBCCPR/C/92/D/1205/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1411/en-US
Yasinovich and Shevchenko v. Belarus
Yasinovich and Shevchenko v. Belarus CCPR/C/107/D/1835 1837/2008 Communication number s : 1837/2008 1835/2018 Author: Anton Yasinovich and Valery Shevchenko Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 107 Country Belarus Submission date 07 May 2008 JUTBCCPR/C/107/D/1835,1837/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3212/en-US
Yasinovich and Shevchenko v. Belarus
Yasinovich and Shevchenko v. Belarus CCPR/C/107/D/1835 1837/2008 Communication number s : 1837/2008 1835/2008 Author: Anton Yasinovich and Valery Shevchenko Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 107 Country Belarus Submission date 07 May 2008 JUTBCCPR/C/107/D/1835&1837/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1273/en-US