Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 100
11. b Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the involvement of children in armed conflict
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 11. b Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the involvement of children in armed conflict New York 25 May 2000 Entry into force : 12 February 2002 in accordance UNIV-11-bhttps://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-11-b&chapter=4&clang=_en
4. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 4. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights New York 16 December 1966 Entry into force : 23 March 1976 in accordance with article 49 for all provisions except those of article 41 UNIV-4https://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-4&chapter=4&clang=_en
ADOPTED CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS: JAPAN
ADOPTED CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS: JAPAN CEDAW/C/JPN/CO/7 8 NULL 2016 03 10T00:00:00 CEDAW United Nations CEDAW/C/JPN/CO/7 8 Convention on the Elimination Distr.: General of All Forms of Discrimination 10 March 2016 against Women Original: English Committee UHRICEDAW/C/JPN/CO/7-8https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/d87f0f54-695a-4507-ba62-448fc975f8f2
Alger v. Australia
Alger v. Australia CCPR/C/120/D/2237/2013 Communication number s : 2237/2013 Author: Christopher Alger Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 120 Country Australia Submission date 30 Mar 2012 Date of decision 13 Jul 2017 Comment: Individual JUTBCCPR/C/120/D/2237/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2315/en-US
Alonzo et al. v. Philippines
Alonzo et al. v. Philippines CEDAW/C/84/D/155/2020 Communication number s : 155/2020 Author: Natalia M. Alonzo Perla B. Balingit Virginia M. Bangit Francia A. Buco Dela Paz B. Culala Belen Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 84 Country JUTBCEDAW/C/84/D/155/2020https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3765/en-US
Andrea Vandom v. Republic of Korea
Andrea Vandom v. Republic of Korea CCPR/C/123/D/2273/2013 Communication number s : 2273/2013 Author: Andrea Vandom Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 123 Country Republic of Korea Submission date 07 Jul 2013 Date of decision 12 Jul 2018 JUTBCCPR/C/123/D/2273/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2496/en-US
CASE OF AL NASHIRI v. POLAND
CASE OF AL NASHIRI v. POLAND 28761/11 GOLDSTON J.A. SKILBECK R. SINGH A. HOLLANDER N. POL 7/24/2014 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Remainder ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0724JUD002876111https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-146044
CASE OF AL-SAADOON AND MUFDHI v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF AL SAADOON AND MUFDHI v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 61498/08 SHINER P. GBR 3/2/2010 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 3 substantive aspect No violation of Art. 6 Violation of Art. 13 Violation of Art. 34 Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient 26 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0302JUD006149808https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-97575
CASE OF CĒSNIEKS v. LATVIA
CASE OF C SNIEKS v. LATVIA 9278/06 KVJATKOVSKA J. LVA 2/11/2014 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 6 Right to a fair trial Article 6 Criminal proceedings Article 6 1 Fair hearing 445 76 136 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0211JUD000927806 FOURTH SECTION CASE OF C SNIEKS ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0211JUD000927806https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-140769
CASE OF HUSAYN (ABU ZUBAYDAH) v. POLAND
CASE OF HUSAYN ABU ZUBAYDAH v. POLAND 7511/13 HUGHES P. DUFFY H. VANDOVA V. MARGULIES J. MICKUM G.B. JANKOWSKI B. POL 7/24/2014 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0724JUD000751113https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-146047
CASE OF JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES OF MOSCOW AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
CASE OF JEHOVAH S WITNESSES OF MOSCOW AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA 302/02 DANIEL R. KRYLOVA G. LEONTYEV A. BURNS J. RUS 6/10/2010 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 9 read in the light of Art. 11 Violation of Art. 11 read in the light of Art. 9 Violation of Art. 6 1 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0610JUD000030202https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-99221
CASE OF KHAMTOKHU AND AKSENCHIK v. RUSSIA
CASE OF KHAMTOKHU AND AKSENCHIK v. RUSSIA 60367/08 961/11 YERMOLAYEVA N. MARALYAN A. DAVIDYAN E. MOSKALENKO K. RUS 1/24/2017 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 14 5 Prohibition of discrimination Article 14 Discrimination Article 5 Right to liberty and ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0124JUD006036708https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-170663
CASE OF KONONOV v. LATVIA
CASE OF KONONOV v. LATVIA 36376/04 IOFFE M.L. LVA 5/17/2010 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 7 Article 14 and Chapter IX of the 1926 Criminal Code of Soviet Russia Article 68 3 of the 1961 Criminal Code 288 536 291 434 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0517JUD003637604 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0517JUD003637604https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-98669
CASE OF MANGOURAS v. SPAIN
CASE OF MANGOURAS v. SPAIN 12050/04 RUIZ SOROA J.M. ESP 9/28/2010 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 5 3 Article 531 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 448 171 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0928JUD001205004 GRAND CHAMBER CASE OF MANGOURAS v. SPAIN Application no. ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0928JUD001205004https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-100686
CASE OF MOCANU AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA
CASE OF MOCANU AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA 10865/09 45886/07 32431/08 POPESCU A. SFIRAIALA I. MATEI I. NACEA D. HARTNEANU D.O. ROU 9/17/2014 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objections dismissed Article 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Six month period Article 35 3 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0917JUD001086509https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-146540
CASE OF NATSVLISHVILI AND TOGONIDZE v. GEORGIA
CASE OF NATSVLISHVILI AND TOGONIDZE v. GEORGIA 9043/05 GIOSHVILI M. FILEEVA E. KOROTEEV K. GEO 4/29/2014 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 6 Right to a fair trial Article 6 Criminal proceedings Article 6 1 Fair hearing No violation of Article 2 of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0429JUD000904305https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-142672
CASE OF PERİNÇEK v. SWITZERLAND
CASE OF PER N EK v. SWITZERLAND 27510/08 CENGIZ M. CHE 10/15/2015 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 10 Freedom of expression General Article 10 1 Freedom of expression Pecuniary damage claim dismissed Article 41 Pecuniary damage Just satisfaction Non ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1015JUD002751008https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-158235
CASE OF PERİNÇEK v. SWITZERLAND
CASE OF PER N EK v. SWITZERLAND 27510/08 CENGIZ M. CHE 12/17/2013 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 10 Freedom of expression General Article 10 1 Freedom of expression Pecuniary damage claim dismissed Non pecuniary damage finding of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1217JUD002751008https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-139724
CASE OF SHINDLER v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF SHINDLER v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 19840/09 STUDIO LEGALE PAOLETTI GBR 5/7/2013 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible No violation of Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 Right to free elections general Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 Vote 343 100 183 498 14 128 574 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0507JUD001984009https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-119229
CASE OF SITAROPOULOS AND GIAKOUMOPOULOS v. GREECE
CASE OF SITAROPOULOS AND GIAKOUMOPOULOS v. GREECE 42202/07 KTISTAKIS I. GRC 3/15/2012 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 Right to free elections general Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 Free expression of opinion of people Vote Article 51 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0315JUD004220207https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-109579