Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 165
4. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 4. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights New York 16 December 1966 Entry into force : 23 March 1976 in accordance with article 49 for all provisions except those of article 41 UNIV-4https://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-4&chapter=4&clang=_en
A.F. v. Italy
A.F. v. Italy CEDAW/C/82/D/148/2019 Communication number s : 148/2019 Author: A.F. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 82 Country Italy Submission date 16 Aug 2018 Date of decision 20 Jun 2022 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCEDAW/C/82/D/148/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3205/en-US
A/HRC/46/5: Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review - Belarus
United Nations A/HRC/46/5 General Assembly Distr.: General 4 January 2021 Original: English Human Rights Council Forty sixth session 22 February 19 March 2021 Agenda item 6 Universal periodic review Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic UPRA/HRC/46/5https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/country-reports/ahrc465-report-working-group-universal-periodic-review-belarus
Adamovich v. Belarus
Adamovich v. Belarus CCPR/C/133/D/2619/2015 Communication number s : 2619/2015 Author: Marina Adamovich Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 133 Country Belarus Submission date 15 Nov 2013 Date of decision 26 Oct 2021 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/133/D/2619/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3156/en-US
Aleksandr Tyvanchuk et al. v. Belarus
Aleksandr Tyvanchuk et al. v. Belarus CCPR/C/122/D/2201/2012 Communication number s : 2201/2012 Author: Aleksandr Tyvanchuk et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 122 Country Belarus Submission date 23 Feb 2012 Date of decision 26 Mar 2018 JUTBCCPR/C/122/D/2201/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2439/en-US
Alonzo et al. v. Philippines
Alonzo et al. v. Philippines CEDAW/C/84/D/155/2020 Communication number s : 155/2020 Author: Natalia M. Alonzo Perla B. Balingit Virginia M. Bangit Francia A. Buco Dela Paz B. Culala Belen Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 84 Country JUTBCEDAW/C/84/D/155/2020https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3765/en-US
Alzery v. Sweden
Alzery v. Sweden CCPR/C/88/D/1416/2005 Communication number s : 1416/2005 Author: Mohammed Alzery Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 88 Country Sweden Submission date 29 Jul 2005 Date of decision 25 Oct 2006 Comment: Pursuant to rule 90 of JUTBCCPR/C/88/D/1416/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1300/en-US
Anderson v. Australia
Anderson v. Australia CCPR/C/88/D/1367/2005 Communication number s : 1367/2005 Author: Tim Anderson Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 88 Country Australia Submission date 26 Jul 2004 Date of decision 31 Oct 2006 Comment: Pursuant to JUTBCCPR/C/88/D/1367/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1306/en-US
Arshidin Israil v. China,Kazakhstan
Arshidin Israil v. China Kazakhstan CCPR/C/103/D/2024/2011 Communication number s : 2024/2011 Author: Arshidin Israil Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 103 Country China Kazakhstan Submission date 28 Jan 2011 Date of decision 31 Oct 2011 JUTBCCPR/C/103/D/2024/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1235/en-US
Bakar Japalali and Carmen Baloyo-Japalali v. Philippines
Bakar Japalali and Carmen Baloyo Japalali v. Philippines CCPR/C/125/D/2536/2015 Communication number s : 2536/2015 Author: Hadji Hamid Japalali Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 125 Country Philippines Submission date 01 Sep 2014 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/125/D/2536/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2569/en-US
Bazarov v. Belarus
Bazarov v. Belarus CCPR/C/111/D/1934/2010 Communication number s : 1934/2010 Author: Igor Bazarov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 111 Country Belarus Submission date 12 Oct 2009 Date of decision 24 Jul 2014 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/111/D/1934/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1845/en-US
Burdyko v. Belarus
Burdyko v. Belarus CCPR/C/114/D/2017/2010 Communication number s : 2017/2010 Author: Andrei Burdyko Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 114 Country Belarus Submission date 17 Dec 2010 Date of decision 15 Jul 2015 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/114/D/2017/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1977/en-US
CASE OF J. AND OTHERS v. AUSTRIA
CASE OF J. AND OTHERS v. AUSTRIA 58216/12 Weiss A. AUT 1/17/2017 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible No violation of Article 4 Prohibition of slavery and forced labour Article 4 Positive obligations Article 4 1 Trafficking in human beings No violation of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0117JUD005821612https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-170388
CASE OF JALOUD v. THE NETHERLANDS
CASE OF JALOUD v. THE NETHERLANDS 47708/08 ZEGVELD L. EIKELBOOM A.W. NLD 11/20/2014 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 2 Right to life Article 2 Positive obligations Article 2 1 Effective investigation Procedural aspect Non pecuniary damage award Article 38 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1120JUD004770808https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-148367
CASE OF KONONOV v. LATVIA
CASE OF KONONOV v. LATVIA 36376/04 IOFFE M.L. LVA 5/17/2010 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 7 Article 14 and Chapter IX of the 1926 Criminal Code of Soviet Russia Article 68 3 of the 1961 Criminal Code 288 536 291 434 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0517JUD003637604 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0517JUD003637604https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-98669
CASE OF MAKTOUF AND DAMJANOVIĆ v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA
CASE OF MAKTOUF AND DAMJANOVI v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA 2312/08 34179/08 LOZO A. MEHIC I. BIH 7/18/2013 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 7 No punishment without law Article 7 1 Heavier penalty Retroactivity Pecuniary damage claim ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0718JUD000231208https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-122716
CASE OF MAMATKULOV AND ABDURASULOVIC v. TURKEY
CASE OF MAMATKULOV AND ABDURASULOVIC v. TURKEY 46827/99 46951/99 N/A TUR 2/6/2003 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 3 No violation of Art. 6 as regard the extradition proceedings No separate issue under Art. 6 as regard the other complaints Violation of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0206JUD004682799https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-60924
CASE OF MAMATKULOV AND ASKAROV v. TURKEY
CASE OF MAMATKULOV AND ASKAROV v. TURKEY 46827/99 46951/99 CARSANCAKLI I.S. TUR 2/4/2005 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 3 Not necessary to examine Art. 2 Inadmissible under Art. 6 concerning the exradition proceedings No violation of Art. 6 1 Failure to ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0204JUD004682799https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-68183
CASE OF MIAILHE v. FRANCE (No. 1)
CASE OF MIAILHE v. FRANCE No. 1 12661/87 N/A FRA 2/25/1993 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection rejected non exhaustion Violation of Art. 8 Not necessary to examine Art. 13 Just satisfaction reserved Customs Code Articles 64 453 454 458 Budget Act of 30 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1993:0225JUD001266187https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57811
CASE OF RANTSEV v. CYPRUS AND RUSSIA
CASE OF RANTSEV v. CYPRUS AND RUSSIA 25965/04 CHURKINA L. M. CYP RUS 1/7/2010 12:00:00 AM Request for strike out rejected Preliminary objection dismissed ratione loci Preliminary objection joined to the merits ratione materiae Preliminary objection ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0107JUD002596504https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-96549