Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 181 - 200 of 13480
B.S.S. v. Canada
B.S.S. v. Canada CAT/C/32/D/183/2001 Communication number s : 183/2001 Author: B.S.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 32 Country Canada Submission date 07 Mar 2001 Date of decision 12 May 2004 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/32/D/183/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/149/en-US
B.S. and N.K. v. Canada
B.S. and N.K. v. Canada CAT/C/71/D/798/2017 Communication number s : 798/2017 Author: B.S. and N.K. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 71 Country Canada Submission date 13 Jan 2017 Date of decision 23 Jul 2020 Comment: Individual JUTBCAT/C/71/D/798/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3425/en-US
B.S. v. Canada
B.S. v. Canada CAT/C/27/D/166/2000 Communication number s : 166/2000 Author: B.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 27 Country Canada Submission date 22 Apr 1999 Date of decision 14 Nov 2001 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCAT/C/27/D/166/2000https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/178/en-US
B.W.M.Z. v. Netherlands
B.W.M.Z. v. Netherlands CCPR/C/107/D/1788/2008 Communication number s : 1788/2008 Author: B.W.M.Z. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 107 Country Netherlands Submission date 26 Jun 2007 Date of decision 25 Mar 2013 Comment: Pursuant to JUTBCCPR/C/107/D/1788/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1331/en-US
B.Z. et al. v. Albania
B.Z. et al. v. Albania CCPR/C/121/D/2837/2016 Communication number s : 2837/2016 Author: B.Z. et al. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 121 Country Albania Submission date 13 Jan 2016 Date of decision 08 Nov 2017 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/121/D/2837/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2362/en-US
BAARS v. the Netherlands
BAARS v. the Netherlands NLD 28/01/2004 00:00:00 27/10/2016 17:05:40 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Infringement of the presumption of innocence due to the denial of costs and compensation for pre trial detention after EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4499
BACZKOWSKI AND OTHERS v. Poland
BACZKOWSKI AND OTHERS v. Poland POL 24/09/2007 00:00:00 21/11/2016 10:26:58 Case Description: Unlawful interference with freedom of assembly due to the authorities arbitrary refusal of requests to hold demonstrations against minorities discrimination lack EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-39910
BAGARELLA v. Italy
BAGARELLA v. Italy ITA 07/07/2008 00:00:00 28/11/2016 10:46:08 Case Description: Protection of private life and correspondence: Arbitrary monitoring of a prisoner s correspondence up to 2004 deriving from a lack of a clear legal framework. Article 8 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-42469
BAISCHER v. Austria
BAISCHER v. Austria AUT 20/03/2002 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Unfair administrative criminal proceedings due to the lack of a public hearing before an Independent Administrative Panel for EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-845
BAJIC v. Croatia
BAJIC v. Croatia HRV 13/02/2013 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:24:46 Case Description: Right to life: Lack of an adequate prompt and effective investigation into the applicants claims that their relatives death resulted from medical malpractice. Article 2 in its EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10133
BALSAN v. the Czech Republic
BALSAN v. the Czech Republic CZE 18/10/2006 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:27:14 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Lack of a fair trial because of the refusal to grant the applicant the right to question or have questioned the co EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6208
BARALIJA v. Bosnia and Herzegovina
BARALIJA v. Bosnia and Herzegovina BIH 29/01/2020 00:00:00 28/02/2020 16:15:44 Case Description: Electoral rights: Deprivation of the possibility to vote and stand in local elections since 2008 due to the State s failure to adopt the measures required for EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54831
BARATTA v. Italy
BARATTA v. Italy ITA 13/01/2016 00:00:00 08/11/2016 09:13:26 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Arbitrary detention as a result of criminal proceedings in absentia leading to life imprisonment of the accused in which he had been declared EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28272
BARBORSKI v. Bulgaria
BARBORSKI v. Bulgaria BGR 26/06/2013 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Unlawful detention of the applicant due to the lack of clarity in the regulations governing situations in which different types of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3896
BARBULESCU v. Romania
BARBULESCU v. Romania ROU 05/09/2017 00:00:00 20/09/2017 18:11:03 Case Description: Protection of private life and of correspondence: Disproportionate interference due to the monitoring of an employee s use of the Internet at his place of work and use of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47645
BARCZA AND OTHERS v. Hungary
BARCZA AND OTHERS v. Hungary HUN 11/01/2017 00:00:00 26/04/2017 16:15:53 Case Description: This group concerns lengthy expropriation proceedings hindering the use of the property in question. Barcza: Violation of the right to protection of property EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46703
BASU v. Germany
BASU v. Germany DEU 18/01/2023 00:00:00 03/02/2023 17:20:59 Case Description: This case concerns the authorities failure to ascertain through an independent body that an effective investigation is carried out by the State authorities into the applicant s EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-62530
BATI AND OTHERS v. Turkey
BATI AND OTHERS v. Turkey TUR 03/09/2004 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:53:30 Case Description: This group of judgments 1 concerns the ineffectiveness of investigations criminal prosecutions and disciplinary proceedings in relation to killing torture ill EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37206
BAYAV v. Turkey
BAYAV v. Turkey TUR 22/02/2012 00:00:00 10/11/2016 11:35:29 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of a fair trial on account of the absence of a hearing in compensation proceedings for both pecuniary and non pecuniary EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-36752
BAYRAK v. Turkey
BAYRAK v. Turkey TUR 24/09/2007 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:04:14 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings due to lack of independence of military disciplinary courts which ordered a lengthy deprivation of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37266