Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 161 - 180 of 10654
B.D.K. et al. v. Canada
B.D.K. et al. v. Canada CCPR/C/125/D/3041/2017 Communication number s : 3041/2017 Author: B.D.K. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 125 Country Canada Submission date 07 Nov 2017 Date of decision 19 Mar 2019 Comment: Individual opinion of Jos JUTBCCPR/C/125/D/3041/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2916/en-US
B.H. v. Austria
B.H. v. Austria CCPR/C/119/D/2088/2011 Communication number s : 2088/2011 Author: B.H. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 119 Country Austria Submission date 14 Feb 2005 Date of decision 28 Mar 2017 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/119/D/2088/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2257/en-US
B.K. v. Norway
B.K. v. Norway CAT/C/62/D/722/2015 Communication number s : 722/2015 Author: B.K. not represented by counsel Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 62 Country Norway Submission date 21 Dec 2015 Date of decision 04 Dec 2017 Comment: JUTBCAT/C/62/D/722/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2414/en-US
B.K. v. Switzerland
B.K. v. Switzerland CAT/C/67/D/828/2017 Communication number s : 828/2017 Author: B.K. represented by counsel Ange Sankieme Lusanga Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 67 Country Switzerland Submission date 05 Jun 2017 Date of decision JUTBCAT/C/67/D/828/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2679/en-US
B.L. (represented by Balmain for Refugees) v. Australia
B.L. represented by Balmain for Refugees v. Australia CCPR/C/112/D/2053/2011 Communication number s : 2053/2011 Author: B.L. represented by Balmain for Refugees Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 112 Country Australia Submission date 15 Apr JUTBCCPR/C/112/D/2053/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1905/en-US
B.M.I. and N.A.K. v. Denmark
B.M.I. and N.A.K. v. Denmark CCPR/C/118/D/2569/2015 Communication number s : 2569/2015 Author: B.M.I. and N.A.K. represented by counsel Hannah Krog Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 118 Country Denmark Submission date 06 Feb 2015 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/118/D/2569/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2229/en-US
B.M.S. v. Sweden
B.M.S. v. Sweden CAT/C/56/D/594/2014 Communication number s : 594/2014 Author: B.M.S. not represented by counsel Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 56 Country Sweden Submission date 09 Feb 2014 Date of decision 25 Nov 2015 Comment: Non JUTBCAT/C/56/D/594/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2079/en-US
B.N.T.K. v. Sweden
B.N.T.K. v. Sweden CAT/C/64/D/641/2014 Communication number s : 641/2014 Author: B.N.T.K. represented by counsel Mai Greitz Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 64 Country Sweden Submission date 01 Dec 2014 Date of decision 09 Aug 2018 Comment: JUTBCAT/C/64/D/641/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2456/en-US
B.S.S. v. Canada
B.S.S. v. Canada CAT/C/32/D/183/2001 Communication number s : 183/2001 Author: B.S.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 32 Country Canada Submission date 07 Mar 2001 Date of decision 12 May 2004 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/32/D/183/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/149/en-US
B.S. and N.K. v. Canada
B.S. and N.K. v. Canada CAT/C/71/D/798/2017 Communication number s : 798/2017 Author: B.S. and N.K. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 71 Country Canada Submission date 13 Jan 2017 Date of decision 23 Jul 2020 Comment: Individual JUTBCAT/C/71/D/798/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3425/en-US
B.S. v. Canada
B.S. v. Canada CAT/C/27/D/166/2000 Communication number s : 166/2000 Author: B.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 27 Country Canada Submission date 22 Apr 1999 Date of decision 14 Nov 2001 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCAT/C/27/D/166/2000https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/178/en-US
B. v. Romania (no. 2)
B. v. Romania no. 2 ROU 19/05/2013 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: Lack of adequate legal protection of the applicant on the occasion of her psychiatric confinements as from 2000 and during proceedings which led to maintaining the measure EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13089
BAJIC v. North Macedonia
BAJIC v. North Macedonia MKD 10/09/2021 00:00:00 23/09/2021 15:54:44 Case Description: This case concerns a violation of the applicant s right to a fair trial due to the failure of the Supreme Court to communicate to the applicant the public prosecutor s EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58423
BAKA v. Hungary
BAKA v. Hungary HUN 23/06/2016 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:32:51 Case Description: The European Court found violations of the Convention on account of the undue and premature termination of the applicants mandates as President Baka case and Vice President Erm EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10859
BALJAK AND OTHERS v. Croatia
BALJAK AND OTHERS v. Croatia HRV 04/04/2022 00:00:00 28/04/2022 15:31:34 Case Description: This case concerns violation of the applicants right to a fair hearing on account of the domestic courts dismissal of their claim for damages against the State in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-60191
BALSAN v. Romania
BALSAN v. Romania ROU 23/08/2017 00:00:00 15/09/2017 15:07:24 Case Description: This case concerns the failure of the investigating prosecuting and judicial authorities to comply with their positive obligation under Article 3 to protect the applicant from EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47601
BARCZA AND OTHERS v. Hungary
BARCZA AND OTHERS v. Hungary HUN 11/01/2017 00:00:00 26/04/2017 16:15:53 Case Description: This group concerns lengthy expropriation proceedings hindering the use of the property in question. Barcza: Violation of the right to protection of property EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46703
BARSOVA v. Russia
BARSOVA v. Russia RUS 22/10/2019 00:00:00 25/10/2019 16:33:48 Case Description: The applicant women in this group of cases were victims of different forms of domestic violence from their male partners/ex partners including repeated assaults abusive and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54105
BAYTAR v. Turkey
BAYTAR v. Turkey TUR 14/01/2015 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:08:36 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings resulting in the applicant s conviction partly based on statements obtained without the assistance EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37330
BEIZARAS AND LEVICKAS v. Lithuania
BEIZARAS AND LEVICKAS v. Lithuania LTU 14/05/2020 00:00:00 12/06/2020 16:56:20 Case Description: This case concerns the refusal of the law enforcement agencies due to their discriminatory attitudes to launch an investigation into the applicants EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55375