Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 721 - 739 of 739
K.J. v. Lithuania
K.J. v. Lithuania CCPR/C/130/D/2674/2015 Communication number s : 2674/2015 Author: K.J. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 130 Country Lithuania Submission date 05 Feb 2015 Date of decision 19 Oct 2020 Comment: Individual opinion of JUTBCCPR/C/130/D/2674/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3296/en-US
M. E. N. v. Denmark
M. E. N. v. Denmark CEDAW/C/55/D/35/2011 Communication number s : 035/2011 Author: M. E. N. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 55 Country Denmark Submission date 06 Oct 2011 Date of decision 26 Jul 2013 Comment: The text of an JUTBCEDAW/C/55/D/35/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1696/en-US
M. N. N. v. Denmark
M. N. N. v. Denmark CEDAW/C/55/D/33/2011 Communication number s : 033/2011 Author: M. N. N. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 55 Country Denmark Submission date 08 May 2010 Date of decision 15 Jul 2013 Comment: This document has no JUTBCEDAW/C/55/D/33/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1695/en-US
MARKUS v. Latvia
MARKUS v. Latvia LVA 11/09/2020 00:00:00 23/09/2020 10:56:42 Case Description: The present case concerns the imposition of a criminal penalty of confiscation of property on the applicant in 2006 2009. The Court concluded that the relevant domestic EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55895
NAMAZOV v. Azerbaijan
NAMAZOV v. Azerbaijan AZE 30/05/2020 00:00:00 12/06/2020 15:42:45 Case Description: The case of Namazov concerns a violation of the applicant s right to respect for his private life on account of his disbarment in 2011 2012 in the absence of adequate EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55353
NEDESCU v. Romania
NEDESCU v. Romania ROU 16/04/2018 00:00:00 15/03/2019 16:06:37 Case Description: The case concerns the continuing impossibility for the applicants to recover their frozen embryos seized by the prosecuting authorities in 2009 in a criminal investigation EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49399
NEDIM SENER v. Turkey
NEDIM SENER v. Turkey TUR 08/10/2014 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:04:14 Case Description: These groups mainly concern unjustified and disproportionate interferences with the applicants freedom of expression on account of criminal proceedings for having EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37296
Nuorgam et al. v. Finland
Nuorgam et al. v. Finland CERD/C/95/D/59/2016 Communication number s : 59/2016 Author: Anne Nuorgam et al. Type of decision: Admissibility decision Session No 95 Country Finland Submission date 14 Mar 2016 Date of decision 07 May 2018 Comment: This JUTBCERD/C/95/D/59/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3444/en-US
OLEKSANDR VOLKOV v. Ukraine
OLEKSANDR VOLKOV v. Ukraine UKR 27/05/2013 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: This group of cases concerns a number of issues related to the independence and impartiality of the judiciary. The Oleksandr Volkov case concerns four violations of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31281
ONER AND TURK v. Turkey
ONER AND TURK v. Turkey TUR 30/06/2015 00:00:00 10/11/2016 11:41:27 Case Description: These groups mainly concern unjustified and disproportionate interferences with the applicants freedom of expression on account of criminal proceedings for having EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-36806
PETRI SALLINEN AND OTHERS v. Finland
PETRI SALLINEN AND OTHERS v. Finland FIN 27/12/2005 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:19:54 Case Description: This group of cases concerns violations of Article 8 due to: 1. the search and seizure in 1999 and in 2009 of privileged material at the applicants law EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5962
Paksas v. Lithuania
Paksas v. Lithuania CCPR/C/110/D/2155/2012 Communication number s : 2155/2012 Author: Rolandas Paksas Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 110 Country Lithuania Submission date 24 Jun 2011 Date of decision 25 Mar 2014 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/110/D/2155/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1819/en-US
Pillai et al. v. Canada
Pillai et al. v. Canada CCPR/C/101/D/1763/2008 Communication number s : 1763/2008 Author: Ernest Sigman Pillai and Laeticia Swenthi Joachimpillai Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 101 Country Canada Submission date 29 Feb 2008 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/101/D/1763/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1631/en-US
Sonia Yaker v. France
Sonia Yaker v. France CCPR/C/123/D/2747/2016 Communication number s : 2747/2016 Author: Sonia Yaker Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 123 Country France Submission date 22 Feb 2016 Date of decision 17 Jul 2018 Comment: The following are JUTBCCPR/C/123/D/2747/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2547/en-US
Third Opinion on the Slovak Republic
Third Opinion on the Slovak Republic SVK ACFC/OP/III 2010 004 2010 05 28 Strasbourg 18 January 2011 Public ACFC/OP/III 2010 004 ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES Third Opinion on the Slovak Republic FCNMACFC/OP/III(2010)004https://hudoc.fcnm.coe.int/eng?i=3rd_OP_SlovakRepublic_en
V. v. Denmark
V. v. Denmark CEDAW/C/64/D/57/2013 Communication number s : 57/2013 Author: V. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 64 Country Denmark Submission date 06 Aug 2013 Date of decision 11 Jul 2016 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/64/D/57/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3030/en-US
Y.W. v. Denmark
Y.W. v. Denmark CEDAW/C/60/D/51/2013 Communication number s : 051/2013 Author: Y.W. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 68 Country Denmark Submission date 02 Jan 2013 Date of decision 02 Mar 2015 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/60/D/51/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2052/en-US
ZAJA v. Croatia
ZAJA v. Croatia HRV 04/01/2017 00:00:00 01/02/2017 17:08:50 Case Description: The cases aja and Lopac concern violations of the applicants right not to be punished without law on account of their conviction of an administrative offence for importing goods EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-45943
ZAYIDOV v. Azerbaijan (no. 2)
ZAYIDOV v. Azerbaijan no. 2 AZE 24/06/2022 00:00:00 03/07/2022 22:00:17 Case Description: The present case concerns destruction of the applicant s book manuscript by the detention facility administration. The Court found that the interference with the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-60703