Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 741 - 749 of 749
ONER AND TURK v. Turkey
ONER AND TURK v. Turkey TUR 30/06/2015 00:00:00 10/11/2016 11:41:27 Case Description: These groups mainly concern unjustified and disproportionate interferences with the applicants freedom of expression on account of criminal proceedings for having EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-36806
PETRI SALLINEN AND OTHERS v. Finland
PETRI SALLINEN AND OTHERS v. Finland FIN 27/12/2005 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:19:54 Case Description: This group of cases concerns violations of Article 8 due to: 1. the search and seizure in 1999 and in 2009 of privileged material at the applicants law EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5962
SVYATO-MYKHAYLIVSKA PARAFIYA v. Ukraine
SVYATO MYKHAYLIVSKA PARAFIYA v. Ukraine UKR 14/09/2007 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: Freedom of association: Unjustified interference on account of the authorities refusal to register changes and amendments to the applicant religious EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31320
Sonia Yaker v. France
Sonia Yaker v. France CCPR/C/123/D/2747/2016 Communication number s : 2747/2016 Author: Sonia Yaker Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 123 Country France Submission date 22 Feb 2016 Date of decision 17 Jul 2018 Comment: The following are JUTBCCPR/C/123/D/2747/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2547/en-US
Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms while countering terrorism
Report to HRC A/HRC/40/52/Add.5 from 24 May 2018 to 31 May 2018 8 May 2019 Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms while countering terrorism Belgium United Nations A/HRC/40/52/Add.5 General Assembly UNSPA/HRC/40/52/Add.5https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f40%2f52%2fAdd.5&Lang=en
TERNOVSZKY v. Hungary
TERNOVSZKY v. Hungary HUN 14/03/2011 00:00:00 03/11/2016 08:47:27 Case Description: Protection of family life: Lack of regulation of home birth resulted in a situation incompatible with the notion of foreseeability and lawfulness. Therefore the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-11570
Third Opinion on the Slovak Republic
Third Opinion on the Slovak Republic SVK ACFC/OP/III 2010 004 2010 05 28 Strasbourg 18 January 2011 Public ACFC/OP/III 2010 004 ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES Third Opinion on the Slovak Republic FCNMACFC/OP/III(2010)004https://hudoc.fcnm.coe.int/eng?i=3rd_OP_SlovakRepublic_en
V. v. Denmark
V. v. Denmark CEDAW/C/64/D/57/2013 Communication number s : 57/2013 Author: V. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 64 Country Denmark Submission date 06 Aug 2013 Date of decision 11 Jul 2016 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/64/D/57/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3030/en-US
ZAJA v. Croatia
ZAJA v. Croatia HRV 04/01/2017 00:00:00 01/02/2017 17:08:50 Case Description: The cases aja and Lopac concern violations of the applicants right not to be punished without law on account of their conviction of an administrative offence for importing goods EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-45943