Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 701 - 720 of 722
Fifth Evaluation Round Compliance Report Belgium
Fifth Evaluation Round Compliance Report Belgium BEL 2021 12 03 2022 01 21 Adoption : 3 December 2021 Publication : 21 January 2022 Public GrecoRC5 2021 11 FIFTH EVALUATION ROUND Preventing corruption and promoting integrity in central governments top GRECOGrecoRC5(2021)11-Final-eng-Compliancereport-Belgium-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=GrecoRC5(2021)11-Final-eng-Compliancereport-Belgium-PUBLIC
First Opinion on Croatia
First Opinion on Croatia HRV ACFC/INF/OP/I 2002 003 2001 04 06 2002 02 06 Strasbourg 6 February 2002 ACFC/INF/OP/I 2002 003 Advisory Committee on the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities Opinion on Croatia adopted on 6 April 2001 FCNMACFC/INF/OP/I(2002)003https://hudoc.fcnm.coe.int/eng?i=1st_OP_Croatia_en
Fourth Evaluation Round Corruption prevention in respect of members ofparliament, judges and prosecutors COMPLIANCE REPORT BELGIUM
Fourth Evaluation Round Corruption prevention in respect of members ofparliament judges and prosecutors COMPLIANCE REPORT BELGIUM BEL 2016 10 21 2017 01 11 I. INTRODUCTION The Compliance Report assesses the measures taken by the Belgian authorities to GRECOGrecoRC4-2016-9-en-Final-Belgium-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=GrecoRC4-2016-9-en-Final-Belgium-PUBLIC
Fourth Opinion on Ukraine
Fourth Opinion on Ukraine UKR ACFC/OP/IV 2017 002 2017 03 10 ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES ACFC/OP/IV 2017 002 Fourth Opinion on Ukraine adopted on 10 March 2017 Published on 5 March 2018 Summary FCNMACFC/OP/IV(2017)002https://hudoc.fcnm.coe.int/eng?i=4th_OP_Ukraine_public_en
Fourth report on Ireland
Fourth report on Ireland IRL 2012 12 05 2013 02 19 CRI 2013 1 ECRI REPORT ON IRELAND fourth monitoring cycle Adopted on 5 December 2012 Published on 19 February 2013 ECRI Secretariat Directorate General II Democracy Council of Europe F 67075 STRASBOURG ECRIIRL-CbC-IV-2013-001-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=IRL-CbC-IV-2013-001-ENG
Interim follow-up Conclusions on Ireland - 4th monitoring cycle
Interim follow up Conclusions on Ireland 4th monitoring cycle IRL 2015 12 11 2016 03 01 CRI 2016 4 ECRI CONCLUSIONS ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE RECOMMENDATIONS IN RESPECT OF IRELAND SUBJECT TO INTERIM FOLLOW UP Adopted on 11 December 2015 1 Published on ECRIIRL-IFU-IV-2016-004-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=IRL-IFU-IV-2016-004-ENG
K.J. v. Lithuania
K.J. v. Lithuania CCPR/C/130/D/2674/2015 Communication number s : 2674/2015 Author: K.J. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 130 Country Lithuania Submission date 05 Feb 2015 Date of decision 19 Oct 2020 Comment: Individual opinion of JUTBCCPR/C/130/D/2674/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3296/en-US
M. E. N. v. Denmark
M. E. N. v. Denmark CEDAW/C/55/D/35/2011 Communication number s : 035/2011 Author: M. E. N. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 55 Country Denmark Submission date 06 Oct 2011 Date of decision 26 Jul 2013 Comment: The text of an JUTBCEDAW/C/55/D/35/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1696/en-US
M. N. N. v. Denmark
M. N. N. v. Denmark CEDAW/C/55/D/33/2011 Communication number s : 033/2011 Author: M. N. N. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 55 Country Denmark Submission date 08 May 2010 Date of decision 15 Jul 2013 Comment: This document has no JUTBCEDAW/C/55/D/33/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1695/en-US
NAMAZOV v. Azerbaijan
NAMAZOV v. Azerbaijan AZE 30/05/2020 00:00:00 12/06/2020 15:42:45 Case Description: The case of Namazov concerns a violation of the applicant s right to respect for his private life on account of his disbarment in 2011 2012 in the absence of adequate EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55353
NEDESCU v. Romania
NEDESCU v. Romania ROU 16/04/2018 00:00:00 15/03/2019 16:06:37 Case Description: The case concerns the continuing impossibility for the applicants to recover their frozen embryos seized by the prosecuting authorities in 2009 in a criminal investigation EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49399
Nuorgam et al. v. Finland
Nuorgam et al. v. Finland CERD/C/95/D/59/2016 Communication number s : 59/2016 Author: Anne Nuorgam et al. Type of decision: Admissibility decision Session No 95 Country Finland Submission date 14 Mar 2016 Date of decision 07 May 2018 Comment: This JUTBCERD/C/95/D/59/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3444/en-US
OLEKSANDR VOLKOV v. Ukraine
OLEKSANDR VOLKOV v. Ukraine UKR 27/05/2013 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: This group of cases concerns a number of issues related to the independence and impartiality of the judiciary. The Oleksandr Volkov case concerns four violations of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31281
PETRI SALLINEN AND OTHERS v. Finland
PETRI SALLINEN AND OTHERS v. Finland FIN 27/12/2005 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:19:54 Case Description: This group of cases concerns violations of Article 8 due to: 1. the search and seizure in 1999 and in 2009 of privileged material at the applicants law EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5962
Paksas v. Lithuania
Paksas v. Lithuania CCPR/C/110/D/2155/2012 Communication number s : 2155/2012 Author: Rolandas Paksas Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 110 Country Lithuania Submission date 24 Jun 2011 Date of decision 25 Mar 2014 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/110/D/2155/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1819/en-US
Pillai et al. v. Canada
Pillai et al. v. Canada CCPR/C/101/D/1763/2008 Communication number s : 1763/2008 Author: Ernest Sigman Pillai and Laeticia Swenthi Joachimpillai Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 101 Country Canada Submission date 29 Feb 2008 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/101/D/1763/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1631/en-US
Sonia Yaker v. France
Sonia Yaker v. France CCPR/C/123/D/2747/2016 Communication number s : 2747/2016 Author: Sonia Yaker Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 123 Country France Submission date 22 Feb 2016 Date of decision 17 Jul 2018 Comment: The following are JUTBCCPR/C/123/D/2747/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2547/en-US
Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms while countering terrorism
Report to HRC A/HRC/40/52/Add.5 from 24 May 2018 to 31 May 2018 8 May 2019 Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms while countering terrorism Belgium United Nations A/HRC/40/52/Add.5 General Assembly UNSPA/HRC/40/52/Add.5https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f40%2f52%2fAdd.5&Lang=en
Third Opinion on the Slovak Republic
Third Opinion on the Slovak Republic SVK ACFC/OP/III 2010 004 2010 05 28 Strasbourg 18 January 2011 Public ACFC/OP/III 2010 004 ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES Third Opinion on the Slovak Republic FCNMACFC/OP/III(2010)004https://hudoc.fcnm.coe.int/eng?i=3rd_OP_SlovakRepublic_en
V. v. Denmark
V. v. Denmark CEDAW/C/64/D/57/2013 Communication number s : 57/2013 Author: V. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 64 Country Denmark Submission date 06 Aug 2013 Date of decision 11 Jul 2016 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/64/D/57/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3030/en-US